IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v38y2021i1p31-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System of Diagnostic Systems framework and its application to the disharmony in Indonesian national security

Author

Listed:
  • Ade Muhammad
  • Utomo S. Putro
  • Manahan Siallagan
  • Kyoichi Kijima
  • Meditya Wasesa

Abstract

Although many strategic problems are highly complex and dynamic, available strategic frameworks fail to provide satisfactory solution recommendation. To provide a strategic solution to this highly complex and dynamic problem contexts, we propose a new strategic framework called the System of Diagnostic Systems (SODS). As an empirical case, we apply the SODS framework to analyse the highly complex disharmony issue in the national security of the Republic of Indonesia. Using SODS, we can analyse the problem contexts of three phases of Indonesian security development in a precise manner. Based on the problem's parameterization (i.e., participants, complexity level, comprehensibility, and rationality), the SODS framework can provide the appropriate strategy and tools to mitigate the complex issue. The SODS recommendations were validated by a number of problem domain experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ade Muhammad & Utomo S. Putro & Manahan Siallagan & Kyoichi Kijima & Meditya Wasesa, 2021. "System of Diagnostic Systems framework and its application to the disharmony in Indonesian national security," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 31-49, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:31-49
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2656
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ade Muhammad & Utomo Sarjono Putro & Manahan Siallagan, 2019. "System advantage strategy framework: a literature review," International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 218-237.
    2. Allison, Graham T., 1969. "Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 689-718, November.
    3. Cole, Arthur H., 1946. "An Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurship: A Tribute to Edwin F. Gay," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(S1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. H. Igor Ansoff, 2007. "Strategic Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-0-230-59060-1, May.
    5. Peter-J Jost & Utz Weitzel, 2007. "Strategic Conflict Management," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2548, March.
    6. Allison, Graham T., 1969. "Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 689-718, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick James & John R. Oneal, 1991. "The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(2), pages 307-332, June.
    2. Miriam Hartlapp & Julia Metz & Christian Rauh, 2010. "The agenda set by the EU Commission: the result of balanced or biased aggregation of positions?," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 21, European Institute, LSE.
    3. Paul A. Raschky & Liang Choon Wang, 2017. "Reproductive behaviour at the end of the world: the effect of the Cuban Missile Crisis on U.S. fertility," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(56), pages 5722-5727, December.
    4. David C. Wilson & Layla Branicki & Bridgette Sullivan‐Taylor & Alexander D. Wilson, 2010. "Extreme events, organizations and the politics of strategic decision making," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 699-721, June.
    5. Bozeman, Barry, 2011. "The 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Implications for theory of organizational disaster," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 244-252.
    6. Basnyat, Bijendra & Treue, Thorsten & Pokharel, Ridish Kumar & Lamsal, Lok Nath & Rayamajhi, Santosh, 2018. "Legal-sounding bureaucratic re-centralisation of community forestry in Nepal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 5-18.
    7. Gaurav Sinha, 2015. "Responding to Complexity: Microfinance MIS Service Providers as Complex Adaptive Systems," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 1(2), pages 163-180, July.
    8. Christian Göpfert & Christine Wamsler & Werner Lang, 2019. "A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Edward H. Kaplan, 2012. "OR Forum---Intelligence Operations Research: The 2010 Philip McCord Morse Lecture," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1297-1309, December.
    10. Jie Yu, 2018. "The belt and road initiative: domestic interests, bureaucratic politics and the EU-China relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 223-236, September.
    11. Paul Cairney & Federico Toth, 2023. "The politics of COVID-19 experts: comparing winners and losers in Italy and the UK," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(3), pages 392-405.
    12. Nutt, Paul C, 1998. "Evaluating Alternatives to Make Strategic Choices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 333-354, June.
    13. Eben J. Christensen & Steven B. Redd, 2004. "Bureaucrats Versus the Ballot Box in Foreign Policy Decision Making," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(1), pages 69-90, February.
    14. Hayes, Dermot J. & Kerr, William A., 1997. "Progress Toward A Single Market: The New Institutional Economics Of The Nafta Livestock Sectors," Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1997: Harmonization\Convergence\Compatibility in Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy: Canada, United States and Mexico 16888, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    15. Michael Brecher & Patrick James, 1988. "Patterns of Crisis Management," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(3), pages 426-456, September.
    16. David Zetland, 2013. "Water managers are selfish like us," Chapters, in: John A. List & Michael K. Price (ed.), Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment, chapter 14, pages 407-433, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Gunton, Cameron & Markey, Sean, 2021. "The role of community benefit agreements in natural resource governance and community development: Issues and prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Staudenmayer, Nancy A. (Nancy Ann), 1997. "Interdependency : conceptual, empirical, & practical issues," Working papers 162-97. Working paper (Sl, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. Michal Parízek, 2017. "Control, soft information, and the politics of international organizations staffing," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 559-583, December.
    20. Ole R. Holsti, 1980. "Historians, Social Scientists, and Crisis Management," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(4), pages 665-682, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:38:y:2021:i:1:p:31-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.