IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v30y2013i1p56-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pragmatic System of Decision Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Metcalfe

Abstract

Making decisions requires a set of criteria be drafted to assist in the evaluation process. Pragmatism offers an alternative philosophy to underpin designing this system. In Western philosophy, there are two main explanations of how to think about any complex situation. One is to use Plato's ideal forms, which involve comparing the actual situation to some ideal. The other is Aristotle's dialectic, which involves setting up a balanced competitive process and awaiting its ever‐changing insights. Mathematics, theory, Abraham religions, landscape gardening and liberal democracy provide examples of the former. Evolution, Schumpeter's capitalism, Marx's socialism and Rorty's pragmatism provide examples of the latter. Whereas Aristotle refers to people, evolution to species, Schumpeter to products, and Marx to class, Rorty's pragmatism refers to the linguistic concepts we have patterned from our past experiences. This paper develops this stream of pragmatism and explains how it can be used to design the system of selection of the criteria used to make and evaluate decisions. Two rapid decision‐making situations are reviewed as a demonstration. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Metcalfe, 2013. "A Pragmatic System of Decision Criteria," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 56-64, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:56-64
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2122
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S Wheeler, 2006. "An analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence force," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(11), pages 1279-1288, November.
    2. Richard O. Mason, 1969. "A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(8), pages 403-414, April.
    3. L Dodd & J Moffat & J Smith, 2006. "Discontinuity in decision-making when objectives conflict: a military command decision case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(6), pages 643-654, June.
    4. Gary Klein, 1999. "Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262611465, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Rakow & Charles Vincent & Kate Bull & Nigel Harvey, 2005. "Assessing the Likelihood of an Important Clinical Outcome: New Insights from a Comparison of Clinical and Actuarial Judgment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(3), pages 262-282, May.
    2. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2018. "Environnement big data et décision : l'étape de contre la montre du tour de France 2017," Post-Print halshs-02188793, HAL.
    3. David Williams, 2014. "Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(1), pages 79-107.
    4. Kim, Jong Hyun & Seong, Poong Hyun, 2007. "The effect of information types on diagnostic strategies in the information aid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 171-186.
    5. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    6. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    7. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    8. Jim Q. Smith & Lorraine Dodd, 2012. "Regulating Autonomous Agents Facing Conflicting Objectives: A Command and Control Example," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 165-171, June.
    9. Betsch, Tilmann & Haberstroh, Susanne & Molter, Beate & Glockner, Andreas, 2004. "Oops, I did it again--relapse errors in routinized decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 62-74, January.
    10. Lorko, Matej & Servátka, Maroš & Zhang, Le, 2019. "How to Improve the Accuracy of Project Schedules? The Effect of Project Specification and Historical Information on Duration Estimates," MPRA Paper 95585, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2017. "Les enjeux des environnements big data pour la Police Nationale," Post-Print halshs-02188803, HAL.
    12. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    13. Mingers, John, 2011. "Soft OR comes of age--but not everywhere!," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 729-741, December.
    14. Marleen Kerkhof, 2006. "Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 279-299, September.
    15. Kalloniatis, Alexander C. & McLennan-Smith, Timothy A. & Roberts, Dale O., 2020. "Modelling distributed decision-making in Command and Control using stochastic network synchronisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 588-603.
    16. Jan Hayes & Sarah Maslen, 2015. "Knowing stories that matter: learning for effective safety decision-making," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 714-726, June.
    17. Henderson, John C. & Rockart, John F. & Sifonis, John G., 1984. "A planning methodology for integrating management support systems," Working papers no. 116. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Jordan Vazquez & Cécile Godé & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2019. "Environnement big data et prise de décision intuitive : le cas de la Police Nationale des Bouches du Rhône," Post-Print halshs-02188451, HAL.
    19. Peecher, Mark E. & Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2013. "An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 596-620.
    20. Andersson, Patric & Engelberg, Elisabeth, 2006. "Affective and rational consumer choice modes: The role of intuition, analytical decision-making, and attitudes to money," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2006:13, Stockholm School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:56-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.