IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i4p1042-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisanship is why people vote in person in a pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Seo‐Young Silvia Kim
  • Akhil Bandreddi
  • R. Michael Alvarez

Abstract

Objective The choice of voting methods has increasingly become a politicized, partisan issue. We ask: Can a nationalized partisan rhetoric cast doubt on vote‐by‐mail (VBM) despite years of experience and a raging pandemic? Method Using 2020 general election records in Colorado, an established all‐mail voting state, we analyze first the general choice of voting methods using supervised machine learning and then the choice to switch to in‐person voting despite having used VBM in previous cycles. Results The choice of voting modes is mainly habitual; local variations of COVID‐19 hardly mattered. Republican partisanship played an important role in predicting “switchers” to in‐person voting; the probability was 5.2 percent conditional on being a Republican as opposed to 1.9 percent for a Democrat. Conclusions The results suggest that voting in person can be heavily polarized by partisan communication, despite being a health behavior in a pandemic and voters having experience with mail voting.

Suggested Citation

  • Seo‐Young Silvia Kim & Akhil Bandreddi & R. Michael Alvarez, 2024. "Partisanship is why people vote in person in a pandemic," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1042-1060, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1042-1060
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13380
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. King, Gary & Zeng, Langche, 2001. "Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 137-163, January.
    3. Wang, Yu, 2019. "Comparing Random Forest with Logistic Regression for Predicting Class-Imbalanced Civil War Onset Data: A Comment," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 107-110, January.
    4. Allcott, Hunt & Boxell, Levi & Conway, Jacob & Gentzkow, Matthew & Thaler, Michael & Yang, David, 2020. "Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Sean Richey, 2008. "Voting by Mail: Turnout and Institutional Reform in Oregon," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(4), pages 902-915, December.
    6. Kousser, Thad & Mullin, Megan, 2007. "Does Voting by Mail Increase Participation? Using Matching to Analyze a Natural Experiment," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 428-445.
    7. Mark Owens, 2021. "Changes in attitudes, nothing remains quite the same: Absentee voting and public health," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1349-1360, July.
    8. Walsh, Katherine Cramer, 2012. "Putting Inequality in Its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(3), pages 517-532, August.
    9. Seo‐young Silvia Kim & R. Michael Alvarez & Christina M. Ramirez, 2020. "Who Voted in 2016? Using Fuzzy Forests to Understand Voter Turnout," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 978-988, March.
    10. Robert M. Stein & Greg Vonnahme, 2012. "When, Where, and How We Vote: Does it Matter?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 93(3), pages 692-712, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Smith & Francisco Alvarez, 2022. "Predicting Firm-Level Bankruptcy in the Spanish Economy Using Extreme Gradient Boosting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 263-295, January.
    2. Fazio, Andrea & Reggiani, Tommaso & Sabatini, Fabio, 2022. "The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 872-878.
    3. Romer, Daniel & Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, 2020. "Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Xi Yang, 2016. "Predicting bank failures: The leverage versus the risk-weighted capital ratio," Working Papers hal-04141595, HAL.
    5. Jacek Rothert, 2020. "Optimal federal redistribution during the uncoordinated response to a pandemic," Departmental Working Papers 64, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    6. Xi Yang, 2016. "Predicting bank failures: The leverage versus the risk-weighted capital ratio," EconomiX Working Papers 2016-15, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    7. Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Michael Weber, 2020. "Political Polarization and Expected Economic Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-158, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    8. J.J. Prescott & Kathryn E. Spier & Albert Yoon, 2014. "Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements," NBER Working Papers 19873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Christian Hopp & Christian Lukas, 2014. "A Signaling Perspective on Partner Selection in Venture Capital Syndicates," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 635-670, May.
    10. Gavoille, Nicolas & Zasova, Anna, 2023. "What we pay in the shadows: Labor tax evasion, minimum wage hike and employment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Angel M. Morales & Patrick Tarwater & Indika Mallawaarachchi & Alok Kumar Dwivedi & Juan B. Figueroa-Casas, 2015. "Multinomial logistic regression approach for the evaluation of binary diagnostic test in medical research," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 16(2), pages 203-222, June.
    12. F. Gauthier & D. Germain & B. Hétu, 2017. "Logistic models as a forecasting tool for snow avalanches in a cold maritime climate: northern Gaspésie, Québec, Canada," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(1), pages 201-232, October.
    13. Douglas Cumming & Lars Hornuf & Moein Karami & Denis Schweizer, 2023. "Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1103-1128, February.
    14. Wang, Xize & Liu, Tao, 2022. "Home-made blues: Residential crowding and mental health in Beijing, China," SocArXiv cy8hz, Center for Open Science.
    15. Kabo, Felichism W. & Cotton-Nessler, Natalie & Hwang, Yongha & Levenstein, Margaret C. & Owen-Smith, Jason, 2014. "Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1469-1485.
    16. Fryges, Helmut, 2005. "The Change of Sales Modes in International Markets: Empirical Results for German and British High-Tech Firms," ZEW Discussion Papers 05-82, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. James Bailey, 2017. "Health insurance and the supply of entrepreneurs: new evidence from the affordable care act," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 627-646, October.
    18. Abel Brodeur & David Gray & Anik Islam & Suraiya Bhuiyan, 2021. "A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1007-1044, September.
    19. Cristian David Correa-Álvarez & Juan Carlos Salazar-Uribe & Luis Raúl Pericchi-Guerra, 2023. "Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models: a case study applied to the results of two questionnaires administered to university students," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1791-1810, December.
    20. Christopher Blattman, 2009. "Civil War: A Review of Fifty Years of Research," Working Papers id:2231, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1042-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.