IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v104y2023i4p619-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personality traits, democratic support, and authoritarian nostalgia

Author

Listed:
  • Sanghoon Kim‐Leffingwell

Abstract

Objective Why do democratic voters feel nostalgia for an authoritarian past? This article introduces a dispositional framework for authoritarian nostalgia, showing that in addition to situational factors, an enduring source of sentimental longing for the authoritarian past may very well be rooted in a person's core psychological structure. Methods I use mixed‐methods approach with data collection from South Korea and Taiwan. Using linear regression models with interaction terms, I analyze the contingent effects of personality traits on authoritarian nostalgia. Results I find that people high in emotional stability are likely to be nostalgic and that the trait's effects are greater than those from other traits traditionally associated with authoritarian ideology. Results from the interaction model show that these impacts are more pronounced with weak and moderate democrats but not with strong democrats. Conclusion People high in emotional stability are nostalgic due to their longing for the proven socioeconomic performance of the past. In addition, the democratic values of individual citizens can constrict how personality shapes voters’ view of former dictatorships.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanghoon Kim‐Leffingwell, 2023. "Personality traits, democratic support, and authoritarian nostalgia," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(4), pages 619-635, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:619-635
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13286
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myungji Yang, 2021. "The Specter of the Past: Reconstructing Conservative Historical Memory in South Korea," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(3), pages 337-362, September.
    2. Aaron C. Weinschenk, 2017. "Big Five Personality Traits, Political Participation, and Civic Engagement: Evidence From 24 Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1406-1421, November.
    3. Iván M. Durán & Francesc Trillas, 2020. "Missing the Dictator? The Effect of the Image of Authoritarian Past on Support for Democracy in Latin America," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 604-622, March.
    4. Gerber, Alan S. & Huber, Gregory A. & Doherty, David & Dowling, Conor M. & Ha, Shang E., 2010. "Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(1), pages 111-133, February.
    5. Haggard,Stephan, 2018. "Developmental States," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108449496, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwight R. Lee & Ryan H. Murphy, 2017. "An expressive voting model of anger, hatred, harm and shame," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 307-323, December.
    2. Marco R Steenbergen & Tomasz Siczek, 2017. "Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 119-136, March.
    3. Rafael Di Tella & Juan Dubra, 2016. "Meet the Oligarchs: Business Legitimacy, State Capacity and Taxation," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1607, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    4. Martín Leites & Gonzalo Salas, 2025. "Intergenerational Transmission of Preferences for Redistribution: The Case of Uruguay," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 252(1), pages 73-112, March.
    5. Seungwoo Han, 2024. "Analyzing “Jayu” in South Korean presidential rhetoric: a comprehensive study from 1948–2023 with a focus on the Yoon Suk Yeol administration," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Bucciol, Alessandro & Zarri, Luca, 2021. "The Non-Cognitive Roots of Civic Honesty: Evidence from the US," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Julie Hassing Nielsen, 2016. "Personality and Euroscepticism: The Impact of Personality on Attitudes Towards the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    8. Katherine Campbell & Cullen F. Goenner & Matthew Notbohm & Adam Smedema, 2022. "Political ideology and CEO performance under crisis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 329-359, January.
    9. Dimick, Matthew & Stegmueller, Daniel, 2015. "The Political Economy of Risk and Ideology," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 237, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    10. Ricks, Jacob I. & Doner, Richard F., 2021. "Getting institutions right: Matching institutional capacities to developmental tasks," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Brigitte Huber & Manuel Goyanes & Homero Gil de Zúñiga, 2021. "Linking Extraversion to Collective and Individual Forms of Political Participation: The Mediating Role of Political Discussion," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1289-1310, July.
    12. Sabrina J Mayer & Luana Russo, 2024. "What one is not: a new scale to measure Negative Party Identity in multiparty systems," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2887-2906, June.
    13. Keun Lee & Djun Kil Kim, 2024. "Compressed development, decompression, and diverging convergence in South Korea: which varieties of capitalism in contemporary Korea?," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 173-200, June.
    14. Ivo Bischoff & Nataliya Kusa, 2016. "Should wealth transfers be taxed? Citizens’ view on a fundamental question," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201636, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    15. Kauder, Björn & Potrafke, Niklas & Ursprung, Heinrich, 2018. "Behavioral determinants of proclaimed support for environment protection policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 26-41.
    16. Micaela Pinho & Mara Madaleno, 2024. "Willingness to pay more health taxes? The relevance of personality traits and situational effects," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 23(1), pages 1-31, December.
    17. André Blais & Jean-François Laslier & François Poinas & Karine Straeten, 2015. "Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 423-442, September.
    18. Markus Jokela & Jaakko Meriläinen & Janne Tukiainen & Åsa von Schoultz, 2022. "Personality Traits and Cognitive Ability in Political Selection," Discussion Papers 152, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    19. Bereket Kebede & Nicole Gross-Camp & Adrian Martin & Shawn McGuire & Joseph Munyarukaza, 2018. "Inequality, envy and personality in public goods: An experimental study," CSAE Working Paper Series 2018-10, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    20. Paul G. Lewis, 2019. "Moral Foundations in the 2015-16 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates: The Positive and Negative Moral Vocabulary of Partisan Elites," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:619-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.