IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v14y2022i5p1113-1132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From impact assessments towards proactive citizen engagement in EU cohesion policy

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Moodie
  • Viktor Salenius
  • Michael Kull

Abstract

European Union (EU) policymakers and academics regard impact assessments as the primary mechanism for communicating the added value of EU Cohesion Policy to citizens. There is a need to look beyond impact evaluations and towards active citizen engagement in policymaking to increase support for EU cohesion policies. This article examines the benefits and different types of legitimacy that citizen involvement confers upon policymaking, before outlining recommendations for proactively engaging citizens within existing EU cohesion policymaking structures. It is argued that citizen engagement fosters greater input and throughput legitimacy into the process, which supplements the output legitimacy bestowed by impact assessments. Los formuladores de políticas y académicos de la Unión Europea (UE) consideran que las evaluaciones de impacto son el principal mecanismo para comunicar a los ciudadanos el valor añadido de la Política de Cohesión de la UE. Es necesario mirar más allá de las evaluaciones de impacto y hacia la participación activa de los ciudadanos en la elaboración de políticas para aumentar el apoyo a las políticas de cohesión de la UE. Este artículo estudia los beneficios y los diferentes tipos de legitimidad que la participación de la ciudadanía confiere a la formulación de políticas, antes de ofrecer recomendaciones para involucrar proactivamente a los ciudadanos en las estructuras existentes de formulación de políticas de cohesión de la UE. Se sostiene que la participación de la ciudadanía fomenta una mayor legitimidad de los insumos y el rendimiento del proceso, lo que complementa la legitimidad de los resultados conferida por las evaluaciones de impacto. 欧州連合 (EU)の政策立案者や学者は、影響の評価を、EU統合政策の付加価値を市民に伝えるための主要なメカニズムとみなしている。EUの結束政策へのより多くの支持を集めるには、影響の評価だけでなく、市民の政策立案への積極的な関与に目を向ける必要がある。本稿では、市民の参加が政策決定にもたらす利益と様々な正当性を検証し、EUの政策決定の既存の構造の範囲で市民を積極的に参加させるための提言を概説する。市民の参加は、プロセスへのインプットとスループットの正当性の向上を促進し、影響の評価によって得られるアウトプットの正当性を補完するものである。

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Moodie & Viktor Salenius & Michael Kull, 2022. "From impact assessments towards proactive citizen engagement in EU cohesion policy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 1113-1132, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:1113-1132
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello & Giovanni Perucca, 2018. "Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: the role of the local context," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 1451-1463, November.
    2. Thomas Risse, 2014. "No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1207-1215, November.
    3. John Bachtler & Carlos Mendez & Hildegard Oraže, 2014. "From Conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative Performance and Capacity in Cohesion Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 735-757, April.
    4. Eduardo Medeiros, 2014. "Assessing Territorial Impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese Case," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9), pages 1960-1988, September.
    5. Roberta Capello & Henning Kroll, 2016. "From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1393-1406, August.
    6. Eduardo Medeiros, 2020. "Introduction: A Handbook on Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA)," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Eduardo Medeiros (ed.), Territorial Impact Assessment, chapter 1, pages 1-6, Springer.
    7. Street, Jackie & Duszynski, Katherine & Krawczyk, Stephanie & Braunack-Mayer, Annette, 2014. "The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Roberta Capello, 2018. "Cohesion Policies and the Creation of a European Identity: The Role of Territorial Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 489-503, April.
    9. Vivien A. Schmidt, 2013. "Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(1), pages 2-22, March.
    10. Cathrine Holst & John R. Moodie, 2015. "Cynical or Deliberative? An Analysis of the European Commission’s Public Communication on Its Use of Expertise in Policy-Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 37-48.
    11. Roberta Capello & Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Cohesion Policy and European identity building: Trust as a mediating element," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 637-653, October.
    12. Roberta Capello & Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Citizens’ perception of Cohesion Policy: from theory to empirical evidence," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 1520-1530, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Femke van Esch & Sebastiaan Steenman, 2025. "Fonder From Afar: Distance, Leadership, and the Legitimacy of the EU," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    2. Cunico, Giovanni & Aivazidou, Eirini & Mollona, Edoardo, 2021. "Building a dynamic theory of citizens’ awareness of European Cohesion Policy interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 758-773.
    3. Ignatov Augustin, 2019. "Institutional Efficiency, Entrepreneurship, and the Premises of Economic Development in the Eastern European Countries," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 64(2), pages 12-32, August.
    4. Enrique López‐Bazo, 2022. "The Impact of Cohesion Policy on Regional Differences in Support for the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1219-1236, September.
    5. Christoph Engel & Luigi Mittone & Azzurra Morreale, 2024. "Outcomes or participation? Experimentally testing competing sources of legitimacy for taxation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(2), pages 563-583, April.
    6. Isuru Koswatte & Chandrika Fernando, 2022. "Policy Development for Crisis Management in the Context of Sri Lanka," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 20(3 (Fall)), pages 295-327.
    7. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature rev," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    8. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Helmer Fernando Llanez Anaya & Claudia Patricia Sacristán Rodríguez, 2021. "Desarrollo territorial y economía solidaria: análisis desde el concepto de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y la incorporación de las comunidades en una estrategia de desarrollo territorial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 22(1), pages 254-278.
    10. Onna Malou van den Broek, 2024. "How Political Actors Co‐Construct CSR and its Effect on Firms' Political Access: A Discursive Institutionalist View," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 595-626, March.
    11. Kroll Henning & Neuhäusler Peter, 2020. "Recent Trends of Regional Development in China – Technological Portfolios and Economic Growth," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 14-27, March.
    12. Christoph Klika, 2015. "The Implementation of the REACH Authorisation Procedure on Chemical Substances of Concern: What Kind of Legitimacy?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 128-138.
    13. Roberta Capello & Silvia Cerisola, 2023. "Industrial transformations and regional inequalities in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 15-28, February.
    14. Vincent Caby & Lise Frehen, 2021. "How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.
    15. Dolls, Mathias, 2024. "An unemployment re-insurance scheme for the eurozone? Stabilizing and redistributive effects," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Lechler, Marie, 2019. "Employment shocks and anti-EU sentiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 266-295.
    17. Giovanni Mandras & Simone Salotti, 2020. "An Input–Output Analysis of Sectoral Specialization and Trade Integration of the Western Balkans Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Degeling, Chris & Rychetnik, Lucie & Street, Jackie & Thomas, Rae & Carter, Stacy M., 2017. "Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 166-171.
    19. Sébastien Chailleux, 2020. "Making the subsurface political: How enhanced oil recovery techniques reshaped the energy transition," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 733-750, June.
    20. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:1113-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.