IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v71y2025i2ne70003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Niccolò Gentile
  • Michela Bia
  • Andrew E. Clark
  • Conchita D'Ambrosio
  • Alexandre Tkatchenko

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) methods are increasingly being used across a variety of fields, and have led to the discovery of intricate relationships between variables. We here apply ML methods to predict and interpret life satisfaction using data from the UK British Cohort Study. We discuss the application of first Penalized Linear Models and then one non‐linear method, Random Forests. We present two key model‐agnostic interpretative tools for the latter method: Permutation Importance and Shapley Values. With a parsimonious set of explanatory variables, neither Penalized Linear Models nor Random Forests produce major improvements over the standard Non‐penalized Linear Model. However, once we consider a richer set of controls these methods do produce a non‐negligible improvement in predictive accuracy. Although marital status, and emotional health continue to be the most‐important predictors of life satisfaction, as in the existing literature, gender becomes insignificant in the non‐linear analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Niccolò Gentile & Michela Bia & Andrew E. Clark & Conchita D'Ambrosio & Alexandre Tkatchenko, 2025. "What Makes a Satisfying Life? Prediction and Interpretation with Machine‐Learning Algorithms," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 71(2), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:71:y:2025:i:2:n:e70003
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.70003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.70003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:71:y:2025:i:2:n:e70003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.