IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v32y2023i11p3469-3483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the ending‐9 pricing strategy along the online shopping funnel

Author

Listed:
  • Jialie Chen

Abstract

Ending‐9 prices are extremely popular among retailers, leveraging consumers’ perception biases. However, despite the popularity of this pricing strategy, understanding of its impact on online retailers is still limited. This is particularly true given the complexity of online retail where consumers need to traverse a shopping funnel, consisting of decisions with shopping cart and purchases. This study aims to answer the following three questions: First, do consumers hold a perception bias toward prices with online retailers? Second, whether and how effective is this bias in shifting consumer decisions? Third, what is an alternative pricing strategy for online retailers, to better leverage consumers’ perception bias? The results of a structural model reveal the impact of a perception bias on consumer decisions, toward both the shopping cart and purchases, at the online retailer. However, while ending‐9 prices exert a sizable impact on shopping cart additions (by nearly 20%), the impact on final purchases is marginal (by less than 4%). A possible reason could be that even if each individual product adopts its ending‐9 price, the cost of the shopping cart (which can involve multiple items) might still not preserve such a pricing structure. Consequently, a firm's ending‐9 pricing strategy for each individual product cannot effectively induce consumers’ perception bias toward the cost of the shopping cart, leading to very limited carryover in lifts from shopping cart additions to purchases. Motivated by these observations, we consider an alternative strategy in which the online retailer adjusts the cost of the shopping cart to end in 9, in addition to its current ending‐9 pricing strategy for individual products. By doing so, the retailer can induce perception bias for both the shopping cart and purchases. Our simulation results suggest that such a strategy not only promotes purchases (by 16%) but also helps reduce shopping cart abandonment (by 3%), the latter of which has become a critical concern for many online retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialie Chen, 2023. "Evaluating the ending‐9 pricing strategy along the online shopping funnel," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3469-3483, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:32:y:2023:i:11:p:3469-3483
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.14045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.14045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rust, John, 1987. "Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(5), pages 999-1033, September.
    2. Manoj Thomas & Daniel H. Simon & Vrinda Kadiyali, 2010. "The Price Precision Effect: Evidence from Laboratory and Market Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 175-190, 01-02.
    3. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3180-3197, August.
    4. Jonathan Z. Zhang & Oded Netzer & Asim Ansari, 2014. "Dynamic Targeted Pricing in B2B Relationships," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 317-337, May.
    5. Young Kwark & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2014. "Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 93-110, March.
    6. Yining Wang & Xi Chen & Xiangyu Chang & Dongdong Ge, 2021. "Uncertainty Quantification for Demand Prediction in Contextual Dynamic Pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1703-1717, June.
    7. Stephen M. Gilbert & Ramandeep S. Randhawa & Haoying Sun, 2014. "Optimal Per-Use Rentals and Sales of Durable Products and Their Distinct Roles in Price Discrimination," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(3), pages 393-404, March.
    8. Stiving, Mark & Winer, Russell S, 1997. "An Empirical Analysis of Price Endings with Scanner Data," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(1), pages 57-67, June.
    9. Yili (Kevin) Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2014. "Product Fit Uncertainty in Online Markets: Nature, Effects, and Antecedents," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 328-344, June.
    10. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    11. Vidyanand Choudhary & Anindya Ghose & Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Uday Rajan, 2005. "Personalized Pricing and Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1120-1130, July.
    12. Xuanming Su, 2007. "Intertemporal Pricing with Strategic Customer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 726-741, May.
    13. Peter M. Guadagni & John D. C. Little, 2008. "A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 29-48, 01-02.
    14. Gah-Yi Ban & N. Bora Keskin, 2021. "Personalized Dynamic Pricing with Machine Learning: High-Dimensional Features and Heterogeneous Elasticity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5549-5568, September.
    15. Cui Zhao & Xiaojun Wang & Yongbo Xiao & Jie Sheng, 2022. "Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3840-3858, October.
    16. Boqian Song & Michael Z. F. Li, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing with Service Unbundling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(7), pages 1334-1354, July.
    17. Maxime C. Cohen & Ruben Lobel & Georgia Perakis, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing through Data Sampling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1074-1088, June.
    18. Tülin Erdem & Michael Keane & T. Öncü & Judi Strebel, 2005. "Learning About Computers: An Analysis of Information Search and Technology Choice," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 207-247, September.
    19. Manoj Thomas & Vicki Morwitz, 2005. "Penny Wise and Pound Foolish: The Left-Digit Effect in Price Cognition," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 54-64, June.
    20. Omar Besbes & Ilan Lobel, 2015. "Intertemporal Price Discrimination: Structure and Computation of Optimal Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 92-110, January.
    21. Liangfei Qiu & Andrew B. Whinston, 2017. "Pricing Strategies under Behavioral Observational Learning in Social Networks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(7), pages 1249-1267, July.
    22. Bita Hajihashemi & Amin Sayedi & Jeffrey D. Shulman, 2022. "The Perils of Personalized Pricing with Network Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 477-500, May.
    23. Kris Johnson Ferreira & Bin Hong Alex Lee & David Simchi-Levi, 2016. "Analytics for an Online Retailer: Demand Forecasting and Price Optimization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 69-88, February.
    24. Juan Feng & Xin Li & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2019. "Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1107-1123, December.
    25. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Vishal Gupta & Michael L. Hamilton, 2021. "The Value of Personalized Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6055-6070, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonca P. Soysal & Lakshman Krishnamurthi, 2012. "Demand Dynamics in the Seasonal Goods Industry: An Empirical Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 293-316, March.
    2. Cui Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng & Zhendong Li, 2023. "The influence of online customer reviews on two-stage product strategy in a competitive market," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 411-503, July.
    3. Liangfei Qiu & Arunima Chhikara & Asoo Vakharia, 2021. "Multidimensional Observational Learning in Social Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 876-894, September.
    4. Zhenling Jiang, 2022. "An Empirical Bargaining Model with Left-Digit Bias: A Study on Auto Loan Monthly Payments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 442-465, January.
    5. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Marc Rysman, 2012. "Dynamics of Consumer Demand for New Durable Goods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 120(6), pages 1173-1219.
    6. Peng, Shuxia & Li, Bo & Zheng, Wei, 2024. "Impact of consumer valuation updating in a competitive software market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Cardella, Eric & Seiler, Michael J., 2016. "The effect of listing price strategy on real estate negotiations: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-90.
    8. Brett R. Gordon, 2009. "A Dynamic Model of Consumer Replacement Cycles in the PC Processor Industry," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 846-867, 09-10.
    9. Jürgen Neumann, 2021. "When Biased Ratings Benefit the Consumer - An Economic Analysis of Online Ratings in Markets with Variety-Seeking Consumers," Working Papers Dissertations 77, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    10. Nicole Koschate-Fischer & Katharina Wüllner, 2017. "New developments in behavioral pricing research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(6), pages 809-875, August.
    11. Young Kwark & Gene Moo Lee & Paul A. Pavlou & Liangfei Qiu, 2021. "On the Spillover Effects of Online Product Reviews on Purchases: Evidence from Clickstream Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 895-913, September.
    12. Cui Zhao & Xiaojun Wang & Yongbo Xiao & Jie Sheng, 2022. "Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3840-3858, October.
    13. Harikesh Nair, 2007. "Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 239-292, September.
    14. Adam N. Elmachtoub & Vishal Gupta & Michael L. Hamilton, 2021. "The Value of Personalized Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6055-6070, October.
    15. Wesley Hartmann, 2006. "Intertemporal effects of consumption and their implications for demand elasticity estimates," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 325-349, December.
    16. Jeremy T. Fox, 2010. "Estimating the Employer Switching Costs and Wage Responses of Forward-Looking Engineers," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(2), pages 357-412, April.
    17. Castilho, Rafael, 2018. "Can Switching Costs Reduce Prices?," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 38(1), May.
    18. Aamir Rafique Hashmi & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2016. "The Relationship between Market Structure and Innovation in Industry Equilibrium: A Case Study of the Global Automobile Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 192-208, March.
    19. Paul Ellickson & Sanjog Misra, 2012. "Enriching interactions: Incorporating outcome data into static discrete games," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Eli Beracha & Michael J. Seiler, 2015. "The Effect of Pricing Strategy on Home Selection and Transaction Prices: An Investigation of the Left-Most Digit Effect," Journal of Housing Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 147-161, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:32:y:2023:i:11:p:3469-3483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.