IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v58y2010i1p1-25.html

Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ford
  • Matthew J. Goodwin

Abstract

The British National party (BNP) is the most successful extreme right party in Britain's electoral history and is the fastest growing political party in twenty‐first century Britain. This article presents the first ever individual‐level analysis of BNP supporters, utilising a survey data set uniquely compiled for this purpose. We find that support for the BNP is concentrated among older, less educated working‐class men living in the declining industrial towns of the North and Midlands regions. This pattern of support is quite distinct from that which underpinned the last electorally relevant extreme right party in Britain – the National Front (NF) – whose base was young working‐class men in Greater London and the West Midlands. Extreme right voters in contemporary Britain express exceptionally high levels of anxiety about immigration and disaffection with the mainstream political parties. Multi‐level analysis of BNP support shows that the party prospers in areas with low education levels and large Muslim minority populations of Pakistani or African origin. The BNP has succeeded in mobilising a clearly defined support base: middle‐aged working‐class white men anxious about immigration, threatened by local Muslim communities and hostile to the existing political establishment. We conclude by noting that all the factors underpinning the BNP's emergence – high immigration levels, rising perceptions of identity conflict and the declining strength of the cultural and institutional ties binding voters to the main parties – are likely to persist in the coming years. The BNP therefore looks likely to consolidate itself as a persistent feature of the British political landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ford & Matthew J. Goodwin, 2010. "Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:58:y:2010:i:1:p:1-25
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00829.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauren McLaren & Mark Johnson, 2007. "Resources, Group Conflict and Symbols: Explaining Anti-Immigration Hostility in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 709-732, December.
    2. Whiteley, Paul, 1979. "The National Front Vote in the 1977 GLC Elections: An Aggregate Data Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 370-380, July.
    3. Lauren McLaren & Mark Johnson, 2007. "Resources, Group Conflict and Symbols: Explaining Anti‐Immigration Hostility in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 709-732, December.
    4. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 135-135.
    5. Budge, Ian, 1994. "A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 443-467, October.
    6. Kai Arzheimer, 2009. "Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 259-275, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melcher, Reinhold, 2018. "I’m still here. Elektorale Erfolgsbedingungen der NPD in Gemeinden Sachsens [I’m still here. Conditions of electoral success of the National Democratic Party of Germany in Saxon municipalities]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 365-397.
    2. Jonna Rickardsson, 2021. "The urban–rural divide in radical right populist support: the role of resident’s characteristics, urbanization trends and public service supply," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(1), pages 211-242, August.
    3. Stephen Drinkwater & Colin Jennings, 2017. "Expressive voting and two-dimensional political competition: an application to law and order policy by New Labour in the UK," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 79-96, March.
    4. Jonna Rickardsson, 2025. "Exposure to refugee camps and voting behavior: a spatial analysis," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 1-38, June.
    5. Sabrina Jasmin Mayer & Christoph Giang Nguyen, 2021. "Angry Reactionary Narcissists? Anger Activates the Link Between Narcissism and Right-Populist Party Support," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 248-259.
    6. Jennings, Colin & Drinkwater, Stephen, 2012. "An Analysis of the Electoral Use of Policy on Law and Order by New Labour," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-77, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    7. Brian Burgoon & Sam van Noort & Matthijs Rooduijn & Geoffrey Underhill, 2018. "Radical Right Populism and the Role of Positional Deprivation and Inequality," LIS Working papers 733, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    8. Gill Valentine & Joanna Sadgrove, 2014. "Biographical Narratives of Encounter: The Significance of Mobility and Emplacement in Shaping Attitudes towards Difference," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(9), pages 1979-1994, July.
    9. Craig Johnson & Sunil Rodger, 2015. "Did Perception of the Economy Affect Attitudes to Immigration at the 2010 British General Election?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1214-1225, November.
    10. Chris Erl, 2021. "The People and The Nation: The “Thick” and the “Thin” of Right‐Wing Populism in Canada," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 107-124, January.
    11. Sabrina Jasmin Mayer & Christoph Giang Nguyen, 2021. "Angry Reactionary Narcissists? Anger Activates the Link Between Narcissism and Right-Populist Party Support," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 248-259.
    12. Daniel Stockemer, 2016. "Structural Data on Immigration or Immigration Perceptions? What Accounts for the Electoral Success of the Radical Right in Europe?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 999-1016, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Michallet & Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta & François Facchini, 2015. "Greening Up or Not? The Determinants Political Parties’ Environmental Concern: An Empirical Analysis Based on European Data (1970-2008)," Working Papers 2015.25, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Heizler, Odelia & Israeli, Osnat, 2021. "The identifiable victim effect and public opinion toward immigration; a natural experiment study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Andrea Junqueira & Ali Kagalwala & Christine S. Lipsmeyer, 2023. "What's your problem? How issue ownership and partisan discourse influence personal concerns," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(1), pages 25-37, January.
    4. repec:pra:mprapa:47899 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bayerlein, Michael, 2021. "Chasing the Other 'Populist Zeitgeist'? Mainstream Parties and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 240403, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    6. Facchini, Giovanni & Margalit, Yotam & Nakata, Hiroyuki, 2022. "Countering public opposition to immigration: The impact of information campaigns," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. James Adams, 1998. "Partisan Voting and Multiparty Spatial Competition," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(1), pages 5-31, January.
    8. Heizler (Cohen), Odelia & Israeli, Osnat, 2024. "Does a Tragic Event Affect Different Aspects of Attitudes toward Immigration?," IZA Discussion Papers 16802, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0191649 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Scott Blinder & Yvonni Markaki, 2019. "Acceptable in the EU? Why some immigration restrictionists support European Union mobility," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 468-491, September.
    11. Petrarca, Constanza Sanhueza & Giebler, Heiko & Weßels, Bernhard, 2022. "Support for insider parties: The role of political trust in a longitudinal-comparative perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 329-341.
    12. Mathew J. Creighton & Daniel Capistrano & Monika Silva Pedroso, 2023. "Educational Mobility and Attitudes Towards Migration from an International Comparative Perspective," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 817-841, June.
    13. Tim Bale & Christoffer Green‐Pedersen & André Krouwel & Kurt Richard Luther & Nick Sitter, 2010. "If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(3), pages 410-426, June.
    14. Stefaan Walgrave & Michiel Nuytemans, 2009. "Friction and Party Manifesto Change in 25 Countries, 1945–98," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 190-206, January.
    15. Robert Rohrschneider & Stephen Whitefield, 2016. "Responding to growing European Union-skepticism? The stances of political parties toward European integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the financial crisis," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(1), pages 138-161, March.
    16. Bjørnskov, Christian, 2005. "Political Ideology and Economic Freedom," Working Papers 05-8, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.
    17. Abou-Chadi, Tarik & Krause, Werner, 2020. "The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions: A Regression Discontinuity Approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 829-847.
    18. Michallet, Benjamin & Gaeta, Giuseppe Lucio & Facchini, Francois, 2015. "Greening up or not? The determinants of political parties’ environmental concern: an empirical analysis based on European data (1970-2008)," MPRA Paper 63335, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2015.
    19. Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati, 2020. "Welfare Chauvinism? Refugee Flows and Electoral Support for Populist‐Right Parties in Industrial Democracies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1600-1626, July.
    20. Jasper Muis, 2010. "Simulating Political Stability and Change in the Netherlands (1998-2002): an Agent-Based Model of Party Competition with Media Effects Empirically Tested," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13(2), pages 1-4.
    21. James F. Adams & Ernest W. Adams, 2000. "The Geometry of Voting Cycles," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(2), pages 131-153, April.
    22. Inge Hendriks & Marcel Lubbers & Peer Scheepers, 2024. "Individual change in rejection of equal opportunities for foreigners among adolescents and young adults in Switzerland: Testing realistic conflict theory from a dynamic perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:58:y:2010:i:1:p:1-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.