IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v96y2015i5p1214-1225.html

Did Perception of the Economy Affect Attitudes to Immigration at the 2010 British General Election?

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Johnson
  • Sunil Rodger

Abstract

type="main"> Immigration and the economy were the most salient issues in British politics at the 2010 general election, yet the relationship between them remains unclear. This article questions whether perception of the economic situation influenced hostility to immigration to Britain during the 2010 general election campaign. This article employs a logistic regression model using the 2010 British Election Study to test the effect of economic perception and other previously identified factors on hostility to immigration. The results show that perception of the economy did have an effect on hostility to immigration at the 2010 British general election. However, the effect is negligible. The findings highlight the influence of other factors in predicting hostility to immigration, particularly identity and culture, party identification, and policy-based factors. The prominence of analyzing the effect of economic concerns in determining attitudes to immigration appears misplaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Johnson & Sunil Rodger, 2015. "Did Perception of the Economy Affect Attitudes to Immigration at the 2010 British General Election?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1214-1225, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:96:y:2015:i:5:p:1214-1225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ssqu.12227
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Dustmann & Tommaso Frattini & Caroline Halls, 2010. "Assessing the Fiscal Costs and Benefits of A8 Migration to the UK," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 31(1), pages 1-41, March.
    2. McLaren, Lauren, 2012. "Immigration and Trust in Politics in Britain," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 163-185, January.
    3. Kinder, Donald R. & Kiewiet, D. Roderick, 1981. "Sociotropic Politics: The American Case," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 129-161, April.
    4. Lauren McLaren & Mark Johnson, 2007. "Resources, Group Conflict and Symbols: Explaining Anti-Immigration Hostility in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 709-732, December.
    5. Robert Ford & Matthew J. Goodwin, 2010. "Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Sides, John & Citrin, Jack, 2007. "European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 477-504, July.
    7. Nannestad, Peter & Paldam, Martin, 1997. "The grievance asymmetry revisited: A micro study of economic voting in Denmark,1986-1992," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 81-99, February.
    8. Sniderman, Paul M. & Hagendoorn, Louk & Prior, Markus, 2004. "Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(1), pages 35-49, February.
    9. Robert Ford & Matthew J. Goodwin, 2010. "Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58, pages 1-25, February.
    10. Alexandra Filindra & Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, 2013. "Together in Good Times and Bad? How Economic Triggers Condition the Effects of Intergroup Threat," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1328-1345, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Hainmueller & Daniel J. Hopkins, 2013. "Public Attitudes toward Immigration," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 1315, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    2. Facchini, Giovanni & Margalit, Yotam & Nakata, Hiroyuki, 2022. "Countering public opposition to immigration: The impact of information campaigns," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Hatton, Timothy J., 2014. "Public Opinion on Immigration: Has the Recession Changed Minds?," IZA Discussion Papers 8248, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Markus M. L. Crepaz & Pierre Naoufal, 2022. "Authoritarianism, economic threat, and the limits of multiculturalism in post‐migration crisis Germany," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(2), pages 425-438, March.
    5. Eddy SF Yeung, 2021. "Does immigration boost public Euroscepticism in European Union member states?," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(4), pages 631-654, December.
    6. K Amber Curtis, 2014. "Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 521-546, December.
    7. Sebastian Fietkau & Kasper M Hansen, 2018. "How perceptions of immigrants trigger feelings of economic and cultural threats in two welfare states," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(1), pages 119-139, March.
    8. Claudia N. Avellaneda & Johabed G. Olvera, 2018. "Chief executives’ approval of immigrants: Evidence from a survey experiment of 101 Latin American and Caribbean mayors," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 1(1).
    9. Mª Ángeles Cea D’Ancona, 2016. "Immigration as a Threat: Explaining the Changing Pattern of Xenophobia in Spain," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 569-591, May.
    10. Beverelli, Cosimo & Orefice, Gianluca & Rocha, Nadia, 2012. "Spillover Effects and Migrant Employment," Conference papers 332276, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Cigdem Kentmen-Cin & Cengiz Erisen, 2017. "Anti-immigration attitudes and the opposition to European integration: A critical assessment," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 3-25, March.
    12. Paula-Manuela Cengiz & Leena Eklund Karlsson, 2021. "Portrayal of Immigrants in Danish Media—A Qualitative Content Analysis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Akhlaq Ahmad, 2020. "Do Equal Qualifications Yield Equal Rewards for Immigrants in the Labour Market?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(5), pages 826-843, October.
    14. Chris Erl, 2021. "The People and The Nation: The “Thick” and the “Thin” of Right‐Wing Populism in Canada," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 107-124, January.
    15. Mathew J. Creighton & Daniel Capistrano & Monika Silva Pedroso, 2023. "Educational Mobility and Attitudes Towards Migration from an International Comparative Perspective," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 817-841, June.
    16. Louis Jaeck, 2024. "Political economy of immigration policy: direct versus indirect political influence," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 41(3), pages 815-837, October.
    17. Jennifer Fitzgerald, 2012. "Social Engagement and Immigration Attitudes: Panel Survey Evidence from Germany," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 941-970, December.
    18. Daniel Stockemer, 2016. "Structural Data on Immigration or Immigration Perceptions? What Accounts for the Electoral Success of the Radical Right in Europe?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 999-1016, July.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9773 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Soeren Enkelmann, 2013. "Government Popularity and the Economy First Evidence from German Micro Data," Working Paper Series in Economics 274, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    21. H鲩court & Spielvogel, 2014. "Beliefs, media exposure and policy preferences on immigration: evidence from Europe," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 225-239, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:96:y:2015:i:5:p:1214-1225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.