IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v65y2014i1p154-190.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity Accounting in Vertically (Hyper-)integrated Terms: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirics

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Garbellini
  • Ariel Luis Wirkierman

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Garbellini & Ariel Luis Wirkierman, 2014. "Productivity Accounting in Vertically (Hyper-)integrated Terms: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 154-190, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:65:y:2014:i:1:p:154-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/meca.12036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo M. Ochoa, 1986. "An Input-Output Study of Labor Productivity in the U.S. Economy, 1947–72," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 111-137, September.
    2. Soklis, George, 2011. "Wage-profit curves of the Finnish economy: evidence from the supply and use tables," MPRA Paper 30183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Stone, Richard, 1998. "Changes in productivity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 229-231, June.
    4. Elmslie, Bruce & Milberg, William, 1996. "The Productivity Convergence Debate: A Theoretical and Methodological Reconsideration," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 20(2), pages 153-182, March.
    5. Oscar De Juan & Eladio Febrero, 2000. "Measuring Productivity from Vertically Integrated Sectors," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 65-82.
    6. Gupta, S & Steedman, Ian, 1971. "An Input-Output Study of Labour Productivity in the British Economy," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 33(1), pages 21-34, February.
    7. George Soklis, 2011. "Shape Of Wage–Profit Curves In Joint Production Systems: Evidence From The Supply And Use Tables Of The Finnish Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 548-560, November.
    8. Pasinetti, Luigi L, 1989. "Growing Subsystems and Vertically Hyper-Integrated Sectors: A Note of Clarification," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(3), pages 479-480, September.
    9. Pasinetti, Luigi L, 1988. "Growing Subsystems, Vertically Hyper-integrated Sectors and the Labour Theory of Value," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(1), pages 125-134, March.
    10. Flaschel, Peter, 1980. "The Derivation and Comparison of Employment Multipliers and Labour Productivity Indexes Using Monetary and Physical Input-Output Tables," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 118-129.
    11. Peter Flaschel & Reiner Franke & Roberto Veneziani, 2013. "Labour productivity and the law of decreasing labour content," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(2), pages 379-402.
    12. Christian Lager, 1997. "Treatment of Fixed Capital in the Sraffian Framework and in the Theory of Dynamic Input-Output Models," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 357-374.
    13. Christian Lager, 2000. "Production, Prices and Time: A Comparison of Some Alternative Concepts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 231-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grodzicki, Maciej J. & Skrzypek, Jurand, 2020. "Cost-competitiveness and structural change in value chains – vertically-integrated analysis of the European automotive sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 276-287.
    2. Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2023. "Structural economic dynamics in actual industrial economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 245-262.
    3. Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo & Santini, Theo & de Acypreste, Rafael, 2023. "A vertically integrated approach to increasing returns and cumulative causation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 49-58.
    4. Brondino, Gabriel, 2019. "Productivity growth and structural change in China (1995–2009): A subsystems analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 183-191.
    5. Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2022. "Productivity homogenisation trends of six advanced industrial economies: A vertically hyper-integrated approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 495-511.
    6. Garbellini, Nadia, 2014. "International division of labour and countries’ competitiveness: the case of Italy and Germany," MPRA Paper 56542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Garbellini, Nadia & Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2023. "The Solow–Pasinetti debate on productivity measurement: Review and reformulation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 438-447.
    8. Yoann Verger, 2018. "First steps for a Sraffian ecological economics. An answer to Martins' “The Classical Circular Economy, Sraffian Ecological Economics and the Capabilities Approach”," Working Papers hal-01700228, HAL.
    9. Antonioli, Davide & Berardino, Claudio Di & Onesti, Gianni, 2023. "The intersectoral linkages and manufacturing productivity growth in Italian regions using the I-O approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 120-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2022. "Productivity homogenisation trends of six advanced industrial economies: A vertically hyper-integrated approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 495-511.
    2. Michael Gaul, 2024. "A Discussion of Marx’s Account of Technical Progress by Means of Wage Curves and Their Historical Evolution," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    3. Theodore Mariolis & George Soklis & Eugenia Zouvela, 2013. "Testing Böhm-Bawerk’s theory of capital: Some evidence from the Finnish economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 207-220, June.
    4. Yoshihara, Naoki & Veneziani, Roberto, 2013. "The Measurement of Labour Content: A General Approach," Discussion Paper Series 587, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Garbellini, Nadia, 2010. "Structural Change and Economic Growth: Production in the Short Run — A generalisation in terms of vertically hyper-integrated sectors," MPRA Paper 25684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Mariolis, Theodore, 2014. "Η θεωρία οικονομικών κρίσεων του Karl Marx [Karl Marx’s theory of economic crises]," MPRA Paper 56831, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2023. "Structural economic dynamics in actual industrial economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 245-262.
    8. Yoann Verger, 2018. "First steps for a Sraffian ecological economics. An answer to Martins' “The Classical Circular Economy, Sraffian Ecological Economics and the Capabilities Approach”," Working Papers hal-01700228, HAL.
    9. Garbellini, Nadia & Wirkierman, Ariel, 2009. "Changes in the productivity of labour and vertically integrated sectors — an empirical study for Italy," MPRA Paper 18871, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Pasinetti, Luigi L., 1998. "A note on Richard Stone's paper on changes in productivity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 233-235, June.
    11. Garbellini, Nadia & Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2014. "Blocks and circularity in labour requirements: An interplay between clusters and subsystems in the EU," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 60-74.
    12. Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2011. "The deindustrialisation/tertiarisation hypothesis reconsidered: a subsystem application to the OECD7," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(2), pages 401-421.
    13. Flaschel, Peter & Fröhlich, Nils & Veneziani, Roberto, 2011. "The sources of profitability," MPRA Paper 30861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Iliadi, Fotoula & Mariolis, Theodore & Soklis, George & Tsoulfidis, Lefteris, 2012. "Bienenfeld’s approximation of production prices and eigenvalue distribution: some more evidence from five European economies," MPRA Paper 36282, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Mariolis, Theodore, 2019. "The location of the value theories in the complex plane and the degree of regularity-controllability of actual economies," MPRA Paper 96972, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Michel Bellet & Stéphane Lallich & Maurice Vincent, 1990. "Noyaux, filières et complexes industriels dans le système productif," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(3), pages 481-500.
    17. Ahmad Fliti, 1995. "L'analyse en termes de secteur verticalement intégré. Une application au cas du BTP en France en 1989," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(5), pages 1333-1359.
    18. Theodore Mariolis & Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2016. "Capital theory ‘paradoxes’ and paradoxical results: resolved or continued?," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 297-322, December.
    19. Theodore Mariolis, 2015. "Norm Bounds and A Homographic Approximation for the Wage–Profit Curve," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(2), pages 263-283, May.
    20. Garbellini, Nadia & Wirkierman, Ariel Luis, 2023. "The Solow–Pasinetti debate on productivity measurement: Review and reformulation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 438-447.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:65:y:2014:i:1:p:154-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.