IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v184y2021i2p479-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample size determination for risk‐based tax auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Petros Dellaportas
  • Evangelos Ioannidis
  • Christos Kotsogiannis

Abstract

A modern system of Revenue Administration requires an effective and efficient management of compliance which in turn requires a well‐designed taxpayers audit strategy. The selection of taxpayers to be audited by Revenue Authorities is a non‐standard sample size determination problem, involving an initial random sample from the population and, based on the statistical information derived from it, a risk‐based auditing scheme whose sole objective is to select for auditing the taxpayers with the highest estimated risk in the population. This paper provides a methodological approach that estimates the initial optimal random sample size such that the Revenue Administration Authority maximises their expected tax revenues. The methodology is illustrated using administrative data from the UK’s Revenue Authority, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Suggested Citation

  • Petros Dellaportas & Evangelos Ioannidis & Christos Kotsogiannis, 2021. "Sample size determination for risk‐based tax auditing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 479-493, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:184:y:2021:i:2:p:479-493
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunter, William J. & Nelson, Michael A., 1996. "An IRS Production Function," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 49(1), pages 105-115, March.
    2. Petros Dellaportas & Dimitris Karlis, 2001. "A Simulation Approach to Nonparametric Empirical Bayes Analysis," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 69(1), pages 63-79, April.
    3. Hunter, William J. & Nelson, Michael A., 1996. "An IRS Production Function," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 49(1), pages 105-15, March.
    4. Munawer Sultan Khwaja & Rajul Awasthi & Jan Loeprick, 2011. "Risk-Based Tax Audits : Approaches and Country Experiences," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2314, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime Vázquez-Caro & Richard M. Bird, 2011. "Benchmarking Tax Administrations in Developing Countries: A Systemic Approach," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1104, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    2. Martin Besfamille & Pablo Olmos, 2010. "Inspectors or Google Earth? Optimal fiscal policies under uncertain detection of evaders," Department of Economics Working Papers 2010-09, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    3. Day‐Yang Liu & Hsin‐Hsin Yao & Wen‐Min Lu & Cheng‐Hsien Lin, 2020. "Impulse response function analysis of the impacts of land value‐added tax policy on government performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1020-1032, September.
    4. Alejandro Esteller-Moré, 2005. "Is There a Connection Between the Tax Administration and the Political Power?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 12(5), pages 639-663, September.
    5. Martin Besfamille & Cecilia Parlatore Siritto, 2009. "Modernization of Tax Administrations and Optimal Fiscal Policies," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(6), pages 897-926, December.
    6. Elena Villar Rubio & Pedro Enrique Barrilao González & Juan Delgado Alaminos, 2017. "Relative efficiency within a tax administration: The effects of result improvement," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 9(1), pages 135-149, February.
    7. Serra, Pablo, 2003. "Measuring the Performance of Chile’s Tax Administration," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(2), pages 373-383, June.
    8. Daniel Sutter & Lee Coppock, 2003. "The Tax Man Cometh: Constitutional Principles for Tax Enforcement," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 107-118, June.
    9. Eduardo Engel & James R. Hines Jr., 1998. "Understanding Tax Evasion Dynamics," Documentos de Trabajo 47, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    10. Semjén, András, 2017. "Az adózói magatartás különféle magyarázatai [Various explanations for tax compliance]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 140-184.
    11. Saudin Terzić, 2017. "Model for determining subjective and objective factors of tax evasion," Notitia - journal for economic, business and social issues, Notitia Ltd., vol. 1(3), pages 49-62, December.
    12. Dina Pomeranz & José Vila-Belda, 2019. "Taking State-Capacity Research to the Field: Insights from Collaborations with Tax Authorities," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 755-781, August.
    13. Dai, Zhixin & Hogarth, Robin M. & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2015. "Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 146-162.
    14. Henselmann, Klaus & Haller, Stefanie, 2017. "Potentielle Risikofaktoren für die Erhöhung der Betriebsprüfungswahrscheinlichkeit - Eine analytische und empirische Untersuchung auf Basis der E-Bilanz-Taxonomie 6.0 -," Working Papers in Accounting Valuation Auditing 2017-1, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Accounting and Auditing.
    15. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben, 2017. "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data," SocArXiv ustxg, Center for Open Science.
    16. Serdar ÇİÇEK & Hüseyin Güçlü ÇİÇEK & Elif Ayşe ŞAHİN-İPEK, 2019. "Behavioral Approach to Tax Compliance Process: Taxpayer Behaviors and Typologies," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society.
    17. Okunogbe,Oyebola Motunrayo & Santoro,Fabrizio, 2021. "The Promise and Limitations of Information Technology for Tax Mobilization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9848, The World Bank.
    18. Era Dabla-Norris & Florian Misch & Duncan Cleary & Munawer Khwaja, 2020. "The quality of tax administration and firm performance: evidence from developing countries," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(3), pages 514-551, June.
    19. von Haldenwang, Christian, 2020. "Digitalising the fiscal contract: An interdisciplinary framework for empirical inquiry," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. Avellón Naranjo, Blanca & Prieto Jano, María José, 2017. "Los factores determinantes de la eficiencia en la gestión de las Administraciones Tributarias Autonómicas españolas/The Determinants of Efficiency in the Tax Management of the Spanish Regional Tax Adm," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 35, pages 749-776, Agosto.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:184:y:2021:i:2:p:479-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.