IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v47y2010i6p1213-1218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Discourse Analysis in Organizational Studies: Towards an Integrationist Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Lilie Chouliaraki
  • Norman Fairclough

Abstract

We engage with Leitch and Palmer's (2010) analysis of Critical Discourse Analytical (CDA) scholarship in organizational and management studies, in order to argue that, whereas they rightly point to the need for further reflexivity in the field, their recommendation for a strict methodological protocol in CDA studies may be reproducing some of the problems they identify in their analysis. We put forward an alternative, relational‐dialectic conception of discourse that defends an integrationist orientation to research methodology, privileging trans‐disciplinarity over rigour.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilie Chouliaraki & Norman Fairclough, 2010. "Critical Discourse Analysis in Organizational Studies: Towards an Integrationist Methodology," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1213-1218, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:47:y:2010:i:6:p:1213-1218
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00883.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loizos Heracleous, 2006. "A Tale of Three Discourses: The Dominant, the Strategic and the Marginalized," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 1059-1087, July.
    2. Michael Reed, 2005. "Doing the Loco‐Motion: Response to Contu and Willmott's Commentary on ‘The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1663-1673, December.
    3. Michael Reed, 2005. "Reflections on the ‘Realist Turn’ in Organization and Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1621-1644, December.
    4. Bill Harley & Cynthia Hardy, 2004. "Firing Blanks? An Analysis of Discursive Struggle in HRM," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 377-400, May.
    5. Mats Alvesson & Cynthia Hardy & Bill Harley, 2008. "Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 480-501, May.
    6. Shirley Leitch & Ian Palmer, 2010. "Analysing Texts in Context: Current Practices and New Protocols for Critical Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1212, September.
    7. Alessia Contu & Hugh Willmott, 2005. "You Spin Me Round: The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1645-1662, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Lewis & Dennis Rodgers & Michael Woolcock, 2013. "The Projection of Development: Cinematic Representation as A(nother) Source of Authoritative Knowledge?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(3), pages 383-397, March.
    2. Shirley Leitch & Ian Palmer, 2010. "Analysing Texts in Context: Current Practices and New Protocols for Critical Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1212, September.
    3. Kyriacou, Orthodoxia, 2016. "Accounting for images of ‘equality’ in digital space: Towards an exploration of the Greek Accounting Professional Institute," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 35-57.
    4. Saes, Beatriz Macchione & Muradian, Roldan, 2021. "What misguides environmental risk perceptions in corporations? Explaining the failure of Vale to prevent the two largest mining disasters in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Soumi Banerjee, 2023. "Performing Agency in Shrinking Spaces: Acting Beyond the Resilience–Resistance Binary," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 147-158.
    6. Adriano Cozzolino, 2020. "The Discursive Construction of Europe in Italy in the Age of Permanent Austerity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 580-598, May.
    7. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.
    8. Eero Vaara & Andrea Whittle, 2022. "Common Sense, New Sense or Non‐Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 755-781, May.
    9. Lehtinen, Esa & Pälli, Pekka, 2011. "Conversational use of genres in managerial meetings," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 287-296, September.
    10. Audley Genus, 2014. "Governing Sustainability: A Discourse-Institutional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Christopher Gaffney, 2013. "Between Discourse and Reality: The Un-Sustainability of Mega-Event Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Wagner, Ulrik & Pedersen, Kasper Møller, 2014. "The IOC and the doping issue—An institutional discursive approach to organizational identity construction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 160-173.
    13. Edward Wray-Bliss & Grant Michelson, 2022. "Modern Slavery and the Discursive Construction of a Propertied Freedom: Evidence from Australian Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 649-663, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirley Leitch & Ian Palmer, 2010. "Analysing Texts in Context: Current Practices and New Protocols for Critical Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1194-1212, September.
    2. Gilles Arnaud & Bénédicte Vidaillet, 2018. "Clinical and critical: The Lacanian contribution to management and organization studies," Post-Print hal-01591534, HAL.
    3. Maddy Janssens & Chris Steyaert, 2009. "HRM and Performance: A Plea for Reflexivity in HRM Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 143-155, January.
    4. Linda L. Putnam, 2015. "Unpacking the Dialectic: Alternative Views on the Discourse–Materiality Relationship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 706-716, July.
    5. Teresa Carla Oliveira, 2006. "Implicit Logic in Managerial Discourse: A Case Study in Choice of Selection Criteria," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 23, pages 53-71, June.
    6. Lehtinen, Esa & Pälli, Pekka, 2011. "Conversational use of genres in managerial meetings," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 287-296, September.
    7. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    8. Filipe J. Sousa & Luís M. de Castro, 2008. "How is the relationship significance brought about? A critical realist approach," FEP Working Papers 282, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    9. Eero Vaara & Andrea Whittle, 2022. "Common Sense, New Sense or Non‐Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 755-781, May.
    10. Michelle Harbour & Jacques-Bernard Gauthier, 2020. "Complex polysemy and reflexivity in organizational research," Working Papers hal-01543416, HAL.
    11. Dambrin, Claire & Lambert, Caroline, 2012. "Who is she and who are we? A reflexive journey in research into the rarity of women in the highest ranks of accountancy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16.
    12. Barbara Townley, 2004. "Managerial Technologies, Ethics and Managing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 425-445, May.
    13. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    14. David S. A. Guttormsen & Fiona Moore, 2023. "‘Thinking About How We Think’: Using Bourdieu’s Epistemic Reflexivity to Reduce Bias in International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 531-559, August.
    15. Tony J. Watson, 2011. "Ethnography, Reality, and Truth: The Vital Need for Studies of ‘How Things Work’ in Organizations and Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 202-217, January.
    16. Robert, Kihlberg & Ola, Lindberg, 2021. "Reflexive sensegiving: An open-ended process of influencing the sensemaking of others during organizational change," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 476-486.
    17. Tommaso Palermo & Michael Power & Simon Ashby, 2017. "Navigating Institutional Complexity: The Production of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 154-181, March.
    18. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    19. Dvora Yanow & Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "What is Reflection‐In‐Action? A Phenomenological Account," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 1339-1364, December.
    20. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:47:y:2010:i:6:p:1213-1218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.