IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i2p239-252.html

Do the stars align?: Stakeholders and strategies in libraries' curation of an astronomy dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Peter T. Darch
  • Ashley E. Sands
  • Christine L. Borgman
  • Milena S. Golshan

Abstract

When developing university‐based research data curation services, libraries face critical decisions around organization and sustainability that can affect dataset producers' satisfaction with these services. We present a study, involving interviews (n = 43) and ethnographic observation, of how two libraries partnered with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to curate a significant astronomy dataset. Each library took different decisions: one library assigned activities to a unit specializing in digital curation, while the other distributed activities across its existing units. Neither approach proved a silver bullet. While library staff members felt the outcomes largely met their expectations, SDSS leaders expressed mixed opinions. We identify three factors that contributed to these differences in perspective: differing strategic motivations for undertaking this Data Transfer Process, SDSS leaders' misperceptions about libraries, and organizational mismatches. These factors contributed to four differences in perspective between SDSS leaders and library staff: provenance as technical information or as information about social context, dataset as a live research object or as a static object to be preserved, systems and services tailored to the dataset or easily adaptable to other datasets, and obstacles as setbacks or as opportunities. Only those differences that emerged when SDSS collaboration members and library staff communicated frequently were resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter T. Darch & Ashley E. Sands & Christine L. Borgman & Milena S. Golshan, 2021. "Do the stars align?: Stakeholders and strategies in libraries' curation of an astronomy dataset," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 239-252, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:2:p:239-252
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24392
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen Gregory & Paul Groth & Helena Cousijn & Andrea Scharnhorst & Sally Wyatt, 2019. "Searching Data: A Review of Observational Data Retrieval Practices in Selected Disciplines," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(5), pages 419-432, May.
    2. Christine L. Borgman & Andrea Scharnhorst & Milena S. Golshan, 2019. "Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(8), pages 888-904, August.
    3. Peter T. Darch & Ashley E. Sands & Christine L. Borgman & Milena S. Golshan, 2020. "Library cultures of data curation: Adventures in astronomy," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(12), pages 1470-1483, December.
    4. Susan Leigh Star & Karen Ruhleder, 1996. "Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 111-134, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isidore Komla Zotoo & Guifeng Liu & Zhangping Lu & Frank Kofi Essien & Wencheng Su, 2023. "The Impact of Key Stakeholders and the Computer Skills of Librarians on Research Data Management Support Services (Id so-21-1893.r2)," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    2. Andrea K. Thomer, 2022. "Integrative data reuse at scientifically significant sites: Case studies at Yellowstone National Park and the La Brea Tar Pits," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1155-1170, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine L. Borgman & Morgan F. Wofford & Milena S. Golshan & Peter T. Darch, 2021. "Collaborative qualitative research at scale: Reflections on 20 years of acquiring global data and making data global," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 667-682, June.
    2. Marcel LaFlamme & Marion Poetz & Daniel Spichtinger, 2022. "Seeing oneself as a data reuser: How subjectification activates the drivers of data reuse in science," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Jenny Bossaller & Anthony J. Million, 2023. "The research data life cycle, legacy data, and dilemmas in research data management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 701-706, June.
    4. David Tilson & Kalle Lyytinen & Carsten Sørensen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 748-759, December.
    5. Yuxiang Chris Zhao & Jingwen Lian & Yan Zhang & Shijie Song & Xinlin Yao, 2024. "Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 298-323, March.
    6. Chimenti, Gianluca & Hagberg, Johan & Araujo, Luis, 2025. "Platforms, infrastructures and the Futures of market society," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    8. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    9. Daniel Fürstenau & Abayomi Baiyere & Natalia Kliewer, 2019. "A Dynamic Model of Embeddedness in Digital Infrastructures," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1319-1342, December.
    10. Álvaro Rocha & Maria José Angélico Gonçalves & Amélia Ferreira Silva & Sandrina Teixeira & Rui Silva, 2022. "Leadership challenges in the context of university 4.0. A thematic synthesis literature review," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 214-246, September.
    11. Davide Nicolini & Maja Korica, 2021. "Attentional Engagement as Practice: A Study of the Attentional Infrastructure of Healthcare Chief Executive Officers," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 1273-1299, September.
    12. Cass, Noel & Schwanen, Tim & Shove, Elizabeth, 2018. "Infrastructures, intersections and societal transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 160-167.
    13. Solange Campos-Romero & Valeria Herskovic & Carolina Fuentes & Esmeralda Abarca, 2020. "Perceptions on Connecting Respite Care Volunteers and Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    14. Scott, Susan V. & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2022. "The digital undertow: how the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Francesca Rizzo & Daria Cantù, 2013. "Live Piloting and Prototyping," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, July.
    16. İbrahimov, Oktay, 2025. "AI as Public Infrastructure: A Critical Review of the Transition from Tool to Societal Necessity," MPRA Paper 127361, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Kristin R. Eschenfelder & Kalpana Shankar & Greg Downey, 2022. "The financial maintenance of social science data archives: Four case studies of long‐term infrastructure work," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(12), pages 1723-1740, December.
    18. Sotiria Grek, 2022. "The education Sustainable Development Goal and the generative power of failing metrics [The Learning Metrics Task Force 2.0: Taking the Global Dialogues on Measuring Learning to the Country Level]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(4), pages 445-457.
    19. Ashley Carse & Joshua A Lewis, 2017. "Toward a political ecology of infrastructure standards: Or, how to think about ships, waterways, sediment, and communities together," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 9-28, January.
    20. Angus Whyte & Ann Macintosh, 2003. "Representational Politics in Virtual Urban Places," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(9), pages 1607-1627, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:2:p:239-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.