IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v51y2013i4p684-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Union–India Trade Negotiations: One Step Forward, One Back?

Author

Listed:
  • Sangeeta Khorana
  • Maria Garcia

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangeeta Khorana & Maria Garcia, 2013. "European Union–India Trade Negotiations: One Step Forward, One Back?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 684-700, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:51:y:2013:i:4:p:684-700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Horn & Petros C. Mavroidis & André Sapir, 2010. "Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1565-1588, November.
    2. Sangeeta Khorana & Nicholas Perdikis, 2010. "EU-India Free Trade Agreement," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 11(2), pages 181-206, September.
    3. Richard Youngs, 2004. "Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU's External Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 415-435, June.
    4. Sophie Meunier, 2007. "Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45, pages 905-926, November.
    5. John Whalley, 2008. "Recent Regional Agreements: Why So Many, Why So Much Variance in Form, Why Coming So Fast, and Where Are They Headed?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 517-532, April.
    6. Sangeeta Khorana & Sujitha Subramanian, 2012. "Potential Accession to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement: A Case-Study on India," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 287-309, March.
    7. Baldwin, Richard, 1993. "A Domino Theory of Regionalism," CEPR Discussion Papers 857, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Montek S. Ahluwalia, 2002. "Economic Reforms in India Since 1991: Has Gradualism Worked?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 67-88, Summer.
    9. Linda Fulponi & Matthew Shearer & Juliana Almeida, 2011. "Regional Trade Agreements - Treatment of Agriculture," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 44, OECD Publishing.
    10. Manfred Elsig & Cédric Dupont, 2012. "European Union Meets South Korea: Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 492-507, May.
    11. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    12. Meunier, Sophie, 2000. "What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU–U.S. Trade Negotiations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(01), pages 103-135, December.
    13. Steven M. Mcguire & Johan P. Lindeque, 2010. "The Diminishing Returns to Trade Policy in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1329-1349, November.
    14. Mahrukh Doctor, 2007. "Why Bother With Inter-Regionalism? Negotiations for a European Union-Mercosur Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45, pages 281-314, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharina Luise Meissner, 2016. "A case of failed interregionalism? Analyzing the EU-ASEAN free trade agreement negotiations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 319-336, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:51:y:2013:i:4:p:684-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.