IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i1p266-296.html

Beyond Industry Boundaries: Impact of Auditors’ Related Industry Knowledge on Audit Quality and Audit Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin‐Chi Chen
  • Hsihui Chang
  • Jengfang Chen
  • Rong‐Ruey Duh
  • Yaou Zhou

Abstract

We examine whether auditors’ knowledge of clients’ related industries impacts audit quality and audit fees. Identifying related industries based on the Input–Output “Use Table” from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, we construct an absolute, nonrelative measure to capture auditors’ knowledge in their clients’ related industries. Our results show that a greater level of knowledge in related industries is associated with higher audit quality and lower audit fees after controlling for the auditor's expertise (specialization) in the client's industry. Further analyses indicate that the quality effects are more salient for an auditor who is not an expert in the client's industry, whereas the fee effects are prevalent across focal client engagements. The evidence suggests that non‐specialist auditors’ cross‐industry knowledge developed via economic links can, to some extent, substitute for specialization in the client industry. In view of advanced technologies that spur increasing interdependence between industries, our findings deliver an important message: Auditors can improve audit efficiency and offer higher quality audits by expanding economies of scope and leveraging their knowledge across clients’ interrelated industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin‐Chi Chen & Hsihui Chang & Jengfang Chen & Rong‐Ruey Duh & Yaou Zhou, 2026. "Beyond Industry Boundaries: Impact of Auditors’ Related Industry Knowledge on Audit Quality and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 266-296, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:266-296
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:266-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.