IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i1p266-296.html

Beyond Industry Boundaries: Impact of Auditors’ Related Industry Knowledge on Audit Quality and Audit Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin‐Chi Chen
  • Hsihui Chang
  • Jengfang Chen
  • Rong‐Ruey Duh
  • Yaou Zhou

Abstract

We examine whether auditors’ knowledge of clients’ related industries impacts audit quality and audit fees. Identifying related industries based on the Input–Output “Use Table” from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, we construct an absolute, nonrelative measure to capture auditors’ knowledge in their clients’ related industries. Our results show that a greater level of knowledge in related industries is associated with higher audit quality and lower audit fees after controlling for the auditor's expertise (specialization) in the client's industry. Further analyses indicate that the quality effects are more salient for an auditor who is not an expert in the client's industry, whereas the fee effects are prevalent across focal client engagements. The evidence suggests that non‐specialist auditors’ cross‐industry knowledge developed via economic links can, to some extent, substitute for specialization in the client industry. In view of advanced technologies that spur increasing interdependence between industries, our findings deliver an important message: Auditors can improve audit efficiency and offer higher quality audits by expanding economies of scope and leveraging their knowledge across clients’ interrelated industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin‐Chi Chen & Hsihui Chang & Jengfang Chen & Rong‐Ruey Duh & Yaou Zhou, 2026. "Beyond Industry Boundaries: Impact of Auditors’ Related Industry Knowledge on Audit Quality and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 266-296, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:266-296
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70017
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. SANJEEV BHOJRAJ & PAUL HRIBAR & MARC PICCONI & JOHN McINNIS, 2009. "Making Sense of Cents: An Examination of Firms That Marginally Miss or Beat Analyst Forecasts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2361-2388, October.
    2. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Shahrur, Husayn, 2005. "Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 61-98, April.
    4. Royston Greenwood & Stan X. Li & Rajshree Prakash & David L. Deephouse, 2005. "Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 661-673, December.
    5. Guan, Yuyan & Su, Lixin (Nancy) & Wu, Donghui & Yang, Zhifeng, 2016. "Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 506-525.
    6. Arghya Ghosh & Hodaka Morita, 2007. "Free entry and social efficiency under vertical oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(2), pages 541-554, June.
    7. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    8. William Greene, 2004. "The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 98-119, June.
    9. Kenneth J. Reichelt & Dechun Wang, 2010. "National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(3), pages 647-686, June.
    10. Carolyn M. Callahan & Gary F. Peters & Joseph H. Zhang, 2019. "Debt contract strictness and auditor specialization," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 686-711, May.
    11. Wei Chen & Paul Hribar & Samuel Melessa, 2018. "Incorrect Inferences When Using Residuals as Dependent Variables," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(3), pages 751-796, June.
    12. Fan, Joseph P H & Lang, Larry H P, 2000. "The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(4), pages 629-660, October.
    13. Okeefe, Tb & Simunic, Da & Stein, Mt, 1994. "The Production Of Audit Services - Evidence From A Major Public Accounting Firm," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 241-261.
    14. Reynolds, J. Kenneth & Francis, Jere R., 2000. "Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 375-400, December.
    15. Nishant Dass & Omesh Kini & Vikram Nanda & Bunyamin Onal & Jun Wang, 2014. "Board Expertise: Do Directors from Related Industries Help Bridge the Information Gap?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(5), pages 1533-1592.
    16. David Hay & Debra Jeter, 2011. "The pricing of industry specialisation by auditors in New Zealand," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 171-195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meiying Hua & Pervaiz Alam, 2021. "Audit Quality and Environment, Social, and Governance Risks," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 50-75, April.
    2. Xiong, Hao & Hou, Fei & Li, Hanwen & Wang, Huabing, 2020. "Does rice farming shape audit quality: Evidence from signing auditors level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 403-420.
    3. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    4. Paul N. Michas & Dan Russomanno & Meiling Zhao, 2025. "The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2555-2606, September.
    5. Kenneth J. Reichelt & Dechun Wang, 2010. "National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(3), pages 647-686, June.
    6. Byung Hun Chung & Daniel W. Collins & Jane Z. Song, 2023. "Managerial myopia and the unintended real consequences of conditional conservatism," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5-6), pages 1060-1097, May.
    7. Cullen Goenner & Xiaoli Guo & Matthew Notbohm, 2024. "Audit engagement partner ideology, ideological homophily, and audit quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5-6), pages 1161-1192, May.
    8. Guangming Gong & Liang Xiao & Si Xu & Xun Gong, 2019. "Do Bond Investors Care About Engagement Auditors’ Negative Experiences? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 779-806, September.
    9. Xingqiang Du & Yiqi Zhang & Shaojuan Lai & Hexin Tao, 2024. "How Do Auditors Value Hypocrisy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 501-533, May.
    10. Jian Cao & Feng Chen & Julia L. Higgs, 2016. "Late for a very important date: financial reporting and audit implications of late 10-K filings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 633-671, June.
    11. Ting Zhang & So Yean Kwack & Yi Si & Gaoliang Tian, 2023. "Non‐GAAP earnings reporting following going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3217-3252, September.
    12. Beck, Matthew J. & Gunn, Joshua L. & Hallman, Nicholas, 2019. "The geographic decentralization of audit firms and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1).
    13. Timothy B. Bell & David B. Bryan, 2021. "Effectiveness, efficiency, and fee premiums in audits led by industry specialist partners," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4513-4572, September.
    14. Jaideep Shenoy, 2021. "Firm vertical boundaries, internal capital markets, and firm performance," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(1), pages 59-97, January.
    15. Huh, Bong Gu & Lee, Sunhwa & Kim, Wonsin, 2021. "The impact of the input level of information system audit on the audit quality: Korean evidence," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    16. Xiaolu Xu & Leo L. Yang & Joseph H. Zhang, 2022. "How do auditors respond to client firms’ technological peer pressure? Evidence from going‐concern opinions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1553-1580, October.
    17. Joshua A. Khavis & Amy G. Sheneman & Brandon Szerwo, 2026. "Does gender composition of audit teams matter? An examination of audit quality and audit cost," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 526-563, March.
    18. Lee, E.Jin & Tahmoush, Dave, 2025. "Auditors’ decision-making aid for going concern audit opinions through machine learning analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Xingqiang Du, 2019. "Does CEO-Auditor Dialect Sharing Impair Pre-IPO Audit Quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 699-735, May.
    20. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:266-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.