IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intlab/v160y2021i4pe52-e65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards inclusive collective industrial relations: Selected articles from the International Labour Review throughout the last century

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard BOSCH

Abstract

Collective industrial relations (CIR) are founded on particular rights that can be exercised only by employee representative bodies, not by individual employees. From the many publications on CIR that have appeared in the International Labour Review over the past 100 years, 15 contributions were selected for inclusion in this Centenary Issue. A criterion for the selection of an article was its focus on the strengthening of inclusivity ‐ that is, the extension of the protection afforded by CIR to as many people as possible and not just to privileged groups. Inclusive CIR are the precondition for reducing discrimination in the labour market and for universalizing decent work.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard BOSCH, 2021. "Towards inclusive collective industrial relations: Selected articles from the International Labour Review throughout the last century," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(4), pages 52-65, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:160:y:2021:i:4:p:e52-e65
    DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ilr.12343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerhard BOSCH, 2015. "Shrinking collective bargaining coverage, increasing income inequality: A comparison of five EU countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(1), pages 57-66, March.
    2. Richard HYMAN, 2015. "Three scenarios for industrial relations in Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(1), pages 5-14, March.
    3. Hyman, Richard, 2015. "Three scenarios for industrial relations in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61888, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Karin Astrid SIEGMANN & Jeroen MERK & Peter KNORRINGA, 2017. "Positive class compromise in globalized production? The Freedom of Association Protocol in the Indonesian sportswear industry," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 156(3-4), pages 345-365, December.
    5. Hannah JOHNSTON, 2020. "Labour geographies of the platform economy: Understanding collective organizing strategies in the context of digitally mediated work," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 25-45, March.
    6. Theodoros PAPADOPOULOS & Antonios ROUMPAKIS, 2013. "The meta-regulation of European industrial relations: Power shifts, institutional dynamics and the emergence of regulatory competition," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 152(2), pages 255-274, June.
    7. Adelle BLACKETT & Colleen SHEPPARD, 2003. "Collective bargaining and equality: Making connections," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 142(4), pages 419-457, December.
    8. Susan HAYTER & Jelle VISSER, 2021. "Making collective bargaining more inclusive: The role of extension," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(2), pages 169-195, June.
    9. Bernard GERNIGON & Alberto ODERO & Horacio GUIDO, 2000. "ILO principles concerning collective bargaining," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 139(1), pages 33-55, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trine P Larsen & Mikkel Mailand & Thorsten Schulten, 2022. "Good intentions meet harsh realities: Social dialogue and precarious work in industrial cleaning," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 7-31, February.
    2. Erica Romero Pender & Patricia Elgoibar & Lourdes Munduate & Ana Belén García & Martin C Euwema, 2018. "Improving social dialogue: What employers expect from employee representatives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 169-189, June.
    3. Dorian Aliu & Ayten Akatay & Armando Aliu & Umut Eroglu, 2017. "Public Policy Influences on Academia in the European Union," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    4. Daniela Ceccon & Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková & Gabriele Medas & Adam Šumichrast, 2023. "LEVEL UP! Support and develop collective bargaining coverage," Research Reports 55, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    5. Colin Crouch, 2017. "Membership density and trade union power," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 47-61, February.
    6. Viorel Rotila, 2019. "The Future of Social Dialogue in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 151-189, September.
    7. Şafak Tartanoğlu, 2015. "Beyond informality: effectiveness of a new actor for representing call centre workers in Turkey," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5-6), pages 381-397, November.
    8. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Kevin Pineda‐Hernández & François Rycx & Mélanie Volral, 2022. "How collective bargaining shapes poverty: New evidence for developed countries," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 895-928, December.
    10. Katie J Wells & Kafui Attoh & Declan Cullen, 2021. "“Just-in-Place†labor: Driver organizing in the Uber workplace," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 315-331, March.
    11. Julieta Haidar, 2023. "The multidimensional configuration of platform work: A mixed-methods analysis of the Argentinian case," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 938-963, November.
    12. Gabriel Eweje, 2009. "Labour Relations and Ethical Dilemmas of Extractive MNEs in Nigeria, South Africa and Zambia: 1950–2000," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 207-223, March.
    13. Dr. Nickolaos Giovanis, 2018. "Determining Factors of Minimum Wage in the Member States of the OECD," Sumerianz Journal of Business Management and Marketing, Sumerianz Publication, vol. 1(4), pages 93-101, 12-2018.
    14. Pablo Blanchard & Paula Carrasco & Rodrigo Ceni & Cecilia Parada & Sofía Santín, 2021. "Distributive and displacement effects of a coordinated wage bargaining scheme," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 21-26, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    15. Paola Naddeo & Stefania Cardinaleschi, 2018. "Wage Gaps By Collective Bargaining And Firm Size In Italy," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 72(1), pages 31-40, January-M.
    16. Helwing Veronique & Verfürth Philip & Franz Martin, 2023. "Trucking (un)limited – the impact of digital platforms on labour in production networks of logistics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(4), pages 177-188, December.
    17. Ive Marx & Gerlinde Verbist, 2018. "Belgium, a poster child for inclusive growth?," Working Papers 1810, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    18. Susan Hayter (ed.), 2011. "The Role of Collective Bargaining in the Global Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14288.
    19. Deborah Dean, 2015. "Deviant typicality: gender equality issues in a trade union that should be different from others," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 37-53, January.
    20. Keller, Berndt, 2020. "Interest representation and industrial relations in the age of digitalization ‒ an outline [Interessenvertretung und Arbeitsbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung - ein Überblick]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(3), pages 255-285.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:160:y:2021:i:4:p:e52-e65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.