IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v22y2018i5p1105-1116.html

LEED v4: Where Are We Now? Critical Assessment through the LCA of an Office Building Using a Low Impact Energy Consumption Mix

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick Lessard
  • Chirjiv Anand
  • Pierre Blanchet
  • Caroline Frenette
  • Ben Amor

Abstract

Various green building rating systems (GBRSs) have been proposed to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. However, these GBRSs, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4, are primarily oriented toward a building's use stage energy consumption. Their application in contexts involving a high share of renewable energy, and hence a low‐impact electricity mix, can result in undesirable side effects. This paper aims to investigate such effects, based on an existing office building in Quebec (Canada), where more than 95% of the electricity consumption mix is renewable. This paper compares the material impacts from a low‐energy context building to material considerations in LEED v4. In addition to their contributions to the building impacts, material impacts are also defined by their potential to change impacts with different material configurations. Life cycle assessment (LCA) impacts were evaluated using Simapro 8.2, the ecoinvent 3.1 database, and the IMPACT 2002+ method. The building LCA results indicated higher environmental impact contributions from materials (>50%) compared to those from energy consumption. This is in contrast with the LEED v4 rating system, as it did not seem to be as effective in capturing such effects. The conclusions drawn from this work will help stakeholders from the buildings sector to have a better understanding of building environmental profiles, and the limitations of LEED v4 in contexts involving a low‐impact energy mix. In addition, this critical assessment can be used to further improve the LEED certification system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick Lessard & Chirjiv Anand & Pierre Blanchet & Caroline Frenette & Ben Amor, 2018. "LEED v4: Where Are We Now? Critical Assessment through the LCA of an Office Building Using a Low Impact Energy Consumption Mix," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1105-1116, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:5:p:1105-1116
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12647
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Peng & Song, Yongze & Shou, Wenchi & Chi, Hunglin & Chong, Heap-Yih & Sutrisna, Monty, 2017. "A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 370-379.
    2. Chau, C.K. & Leung, T.M. & Ng, W.Y., 2015. "A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 395-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhuyuan Xue & Hongbo Liu & Qinxiao Zhang & Jingxin Wang & Jilin Fan & Xia Zhou, 2019. "The Impact Assessment of Campus Buildings Based on a Life Cycle Assessment–Life Cycle Cost Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Svetlana Pushkar, 2023. "LEED-CI v4 Projects in Terms of Life Cycle Assessment in Manhattan, New York City: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Kikki Lambrecht Ipsen & Massimo Pizzol & Morten Birkved & Ben Amor, 2024. "Environmental performance of eco‐design strategies applied to the building sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 556-572, June.
    4. Svetlana Pushkar, 2023. "Life-Cycle Assessment of LEED-CI v4 Projects in Shanghai, China: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    2. Gao, Hui & Wang, Donglin & Du, Xiaoxu & Zhao, Zhongwei, 2024. "An LCA-BIM integrated model for carbon-emission calculation of prefabricated buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Yaxuan Yang & Min Liu & Peihong Zhu & Ke Gao & Yueheng Xuan & Qingmei Lu & Yue Ding & Baoguo Zhang & Ming Yue, 2024. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Bonded Nd-Fe-B Magnets: Virgin Production versus Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Meijing Liu & Changqi Liu & Hao Xie & Zhonghui Zhao & Chong Zhu & Yangang Lu & Changsheng Bu, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of Photovoltaic Curtain Walls Replacing Glass Curtain Walls on the Whole Life Cycle Carbon Emission of Public Buildings Based on BIM Modeling Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Burek, Jasmina & Nutter, Darin W., 2019. "A life cycle assessment-based multi-objective optimization of the purchased, solar, and wind energy for the grocery, perishables, and general merchandise multi-facility distribution center network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1427-1446.
    6. Zeng, Cheng & Liu, Shuli & Shukla, Ashish, 2017. "A review on the air-to-air heat and mass exchanger technologies for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 753-774.
    7. Parul Bhyan & Bhavna Shrivastava & Nand Kumar, 2023. "Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment system for residential buildings: using bibliometric analysis 2000–2020," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 13637-13665, December.
    8. Khoshgoftar Manesh, Mohammad Hasan & Davadgaran, Sepehr & Mousavi Rabeti, Seyed Alireza & Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M., 2024. "Optimal 4E evaluation of an innovative solar-wind cogeneration system for sustainable power and fresh water production based on integration of microbial desalination cell, humidification- dehumidification, and reverse osmosis desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    9. Ng, Wai Lam & Chin, Min Yee & Zhou, Jinqin & Woon, Kok Sin & Ching, Ann Ying, 2022. "The overlooked criteria in green building certification system: Embodied energy and thermal insulation on non-residential building with a case study in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    10. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    11. Yuanxin Liu & FengYun Li & Yi Wang & Xinhua Yu & Jiahai Yuan & Yuwei Wang, 2018. "Assessing the Environmental Impact Caused by Power Grid Projects in High Altitude Areas Based on BWM and Vague Sets Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Patricia González-Vallejo & Radu Muntean & Jaime Solís-Guzmán & Madelyn Marrero, 2020. "Carbon Footprint of Dwelling Construction in Romania and Spain. A Comparative Analysis with the OERCO2 Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Peng Wu & Yongze Song & Jun Wang & Xiangyu Wang & Xianbo Zhao & Qinghua He, 2017. "Regional Variations of Credits Obtained by LEED 2009 Certified Green Buildings—A Country Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Song, Xintong & Li, Junjie & Wang, Yirong & Zhang, Jie & Chen, Yujia & Cao, Ying & Yan, Yulong & Zhang, Sheng & Li, Zhen & Li, Menggang & Xie, Kechang & Peng, Lin, 2025. "Technological advancements in coal-to-liquid systems for enhanced environmental and economic benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    15. Wei Xia & Yanyan Geng & Chunlei Zhao & Ming Tao & Xianpeng Qiu, 2025. "Towards Sustainable Minerals for Energy Transition: LCA Insights from an Open-Pit Molybdenum–Copper Mine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Wang, Hong & Wu, Jun-Jun & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang & Zhao, Liang, 2016. "Energy–environment–economy evaluations of commercial scale systems for blast furnace slag treatment: Dry slag granulation vs. water quenching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 314-324.
    17. Hanli Chen & Chunmei Lu, 2023. "Research on the Spatial Effect and Threshold Characteristics of New-Type Urbanization on Carbon Emissions in China’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Duan, Zhuocheng & de Wilde, Pieter & Attia, Shady & Zuo, Jian, 2025. "Challenges in predicting the impact of climate change on thermal building performance through simulation: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    19. Ramirez, Angel D. & Rivela, Beatriz & Boero, Andrea & Melendres, Ana M., 2019. "Lights and shadows of the environmental impacts of fossil-based electricity generation technologies: A contribution based on the Ecuadorian experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 467-477.
    20. Fang, Zigeng & Yan, Jiayi & Lu, Qiuchen & Chen, Long & Yang, Pu & Tang, Junqing & Jiang, Feng & Broyd, Tim & Hong, Jingke, 2023. "A systematic literature review of carbon footprint decision-making approaches for infrastructure and building projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:5:p:1105-1116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.