IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v46y2015i3p236-253.html

Austerity, labour market segmentation and emigration: the case of Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Arunas Juska
  • Charles Woolfson

Abstract

The so-called ‘Baltic model’ of austerity sometimes receives uncritical praise from advocates of tightened austerity. This model has achieved an almost uncontested vogue among international finance officials and European Union policy makers who portray it as a ‘socially costless’ template for other crisis economies. The article examines the impact of austerity on Baltic Lithuania, a peripheral newer EU member state, and suggests that the harsh austerity measures adopted by its government in order to restore fiscal balance have been far from socially costless. Austerity has accelerated fragmentation of the labour market into a differentially advantaged primary (largely public) sector, and an increasingly informalised secondary (low-skill manufacturing and services) sector, stimulating extraordinarily high levels of emigration as the population, especially younger persons, depart from the country. We describe this here as the formation of a new austeriat.

Suggested Citation

  • Arunas Juska & Charles Woolfson, 2015. "Austerity, labour market segmentation and emigration: the case of Lithuania," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 236-253, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:3:p:236-253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/irj.12102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Sommers, 2009. "The Anglo-American Model of Economic Organization and Governance: Entropy and the Fragmentation of Social Solidarity in Twenty-first Century Latvia," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 127-142.
    2. Markku Sippola, 2013. "The Awkward Choices Facing the Baltic Worker: Exit or Loyalty," Journal of Baltic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 451-473, December.
    3. E. Maldeikis, 1996. "Privatisation in Lithuania: Expectations, Process, Consequences," CERT Discussion Papers 9603, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    4. Raudla, Ringa & Kattel, Rainer, 2011. "Why Did Estonia Choose Fiscal Retrenchment after the 2008 Crisis?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 163-186, August.
    5. Blyth, Mark, 2013. "Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199828302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dibeh, Ghassan & Fakih, Ali & Marrouch, Walid, 2018. "Labor Market and Institutional Drivers of Youth Irregular Migration: Evidence from the MENA Region," IZA Discussion Papers 11903, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Barbara Samaluk, 2017. "Austerity stabilised through European funds: the impact on Slovenian welfare administration and provision," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 56-71, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. B. Usha, 2014. "Social Consequences of Neoliberal Economic Crisis and Austerity Policy in the Baltic States," International Studies, , vol. 51(1-4), pages 72-100, January.
    2. Lea Steininger & Casimir Hesse, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp357, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    3. Despina Gavresi & Anastasia Litina, 2025. "The Legacy of Growing Up in a Recession on Attitudes Towards European Union," CESifo Working Paper Series 12082, CESifo.
    4. Tamborini, Roberto & Tomaselli, Matteo, 2020. "The determinants of austerity in the European Union 2010–16," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Simon Dudek & Hans-Martin Zademach, 2023. "Territorial development in Bavaria between spatial justice and austere federalism: A historical-materialist policy analysis of Bavarian regional development politics and policies, 2008–2018," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 890-904, June.
    6. Lars P. Feld & Ekkehard A. Köhler, 2023. "Standing on the shoulders of giants or science? Lessons from ordoliberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 197-211, June.
    7. Achim Truger, 2015. "Implementing the golden rule for public investment in Europe," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 138, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    8. Jörg Bibow, 2018. "How Germany’s anti-Keynesianism has brought Europe to its knees," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 569-588, September.
    9. Andrew Robson & David Hart, 2019. "The post-Brexit donor: segmenting the UK charitable marketplace using political attitudes and national identity," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 313-334, December.
    10. Reto Bürgisser & Donato Di Carlo, 2023. "Blessing or Curse? The Rise of Tourism‐Led Growth in Europe's Southern Periphery," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 236-258, January.
    11. Mark Setterfield, 2024. "Managing the Discontent of the Losers Redux: A Future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism or Social Capitalism?," FMM Working Paper 98-2024, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    12. repec:osf:socarx:862ua_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Joanna Ganning, 2023. "Quantifying the impacts of suburbanization without growth on central city housing vacancy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1002-1018, December.
    14. Philipp Heimberger, 2020. "The dynamic effects of fiscal consolidation episodes on income inequality: evidence for 17 OECD countries over 1978–2013," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 53-81, February.
    15. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-François & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Ivo Arnold, 2021. "An Interest Stabilisation Mechanism to Unburden the ECB," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(5), pages 274-277, September.
    17. Amrita Chhachhi & Kade Finnoff & Arjun Jayadev, 2014. "Rethinking Labour Market Policy: Alternative Manifestos," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 1155-1171, September.
    18. Pühringer, Stephan, 2017. "The "eternal character" of austerity measures in European crisis policies: Evidences from the Fiscal Compact discourse in Austria," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-32, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.
    19. Mitchell Christopher W., 2016. "The structure of financial markets and the form of state bailouts, 1974–2009," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 97-122, August.
    20. Costa Cabral, Nazare, 2022. "The European Monetary Integration Trap: incomplete sovereignty and the State-mimicking method," MPRA Paper 115245, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Pühringer, Stephan & Ötsch, Walter, 2019. "Die Wirkmacht der "Liebe zum Markt": Zum anhaltenden Einfluss ordoliberaler ÖkonomInnen-Netzwerke in Politik und Gesellschaft," Working Paper Serie des Instituts für Ökonomie Ök-45, Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung (HfGG), Institut für Ökonomie.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:46:y:2015:i:3:p:236-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.