IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i4p890-904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial development in Bavaria between spatial justice and austere federalism: A historical-materialist policy analysis of Bavarian regional development politics and policies, 2008–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Dudek
  • Hans-Martin Zademach

Abstract

This paper examines the territorial development reforms in the federal state of Bavaria, Germany between 2008 and 2018 in light of the rise of austerity policies, introducing the concept of ‘austere federalism’ as a new state spatial process in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Methodologically, the paper draws on the historical-materialist policy analysis and identifies three processes – municipalisation, competitisation, and responsibilisation – as key elements of a new hegemonic project. Our findings suggest that the years following the crisis saw a paradigm shift in spatial planning taking place, characterised by a carrot-and-stick policy of planning deregulation and austerity discipline. Rather than diminishing disparities, however, this shift runs the risk of exacerbating spatial inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Dudek & Hans-Martin Zademach, 2023. "Territorial development in Bavaria between spatial justice and austere federalism: A historical-materialist policy analysis of Bavarian regional development politics and policies, 2008–2018," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 890-904, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:4:p:890-904
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221140893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221140893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221140893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kitson & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2011. "The geographies of austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 4(3), pages 289-302.
    2. Brenner, Neil, 2004. "New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270064.
    3. Simone Tulumello & Giancarlo Cotella & Frank Othengrafen, 2020. "Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 72-87, January.
    4. Jamie Peck, 2014. "Editor's choice Pushing austerity: state failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 17-44.
    5. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore & Neil Brenner, 2013. "Neoliberal Urbanism Redux?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 1091-1099, May.
    6. Blyth, Mark, 2013. "Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199828302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2015. "Understanding employment growth in the recession: the geographic diversity of state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 359-377.
    2. Crispian Fuller & Karen West, 2017. "The possibilities and limits of political contestation in times of ‘urban austerity’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2087-2106, July.
    3. Dudek, Simon, 2022. "Bayerische Landesentwicklung im Lichte von Finanzkrise und austeritätspolitischem Föderalismus: Bestandsaufnahme und Herausforderungen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Miosga, Manfred & Dudek, Simon & Klee, Andreas (ed.), Neue Perspektiven für eine zukunftsfähige Raumordnung in Bayern, volume 35, pages 46-58, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 4-30, January.
    5. Mike Coombes & Peter O'Brien & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2016. "Austerity States, Institutional Dismantling and the Governance of Sub-National Economic Development: The Demise of the Regional Development Agencies in England," SERC Discussion Papers 0206, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. Margalit, Talia & Mualam, Nir, 2020. "Selective rescaling, inequality and popular growth coalitions: The case of the Israeli national plan for earthquake preparedness," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    9. Peter O’Brien & Andy Pike, 2019. "‘Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK City Deals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1448-1476, May.
    10. Susan Baker & Matthew J. Quinn, 2022. "Populism, Austerity and Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times: Introduction to Special Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Luca, Davide & Milio, Simona, 2016. "The geography of the economic crisis in Europe: national macroeconomic conditions, regional structural factors and short-term economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64061, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Edward Yates & Ian Clark & William Rossiter, 2021. "Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 115-132, March.
    13. Crispian Fuller, 2017. "City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 745-766, April.
    14. Melis Oguz & Evren Tok, 2011. "Gentrification as a Blanket Concept: A Tale of Resisting and Contesting Neoliberal Urbanization Programmes," ERSA conference papers ersa11p201, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Mildred E Warner & Paige M Kelly & Xue Zhang, 2023. "Challenging austerity under the COVID-19 state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 197-209.
    16. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ & Mehmet Penpecioğlu, 2017. "Urban crisis: ‘Limits to governance of alienation’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2056-2071, July.
    17. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    18. Geneviève Zembri-Mary & Virginie Engrand-Linder, 2023. "Urban planning law in the face of the Olympic challenge: Between innovation and criticism of exceptional urban regeneration," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 369-388, June.
    19. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Achim Truger, 2015. "Implementing the golden rule for public investment in Europe," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 138, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:4:p:890-904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.