IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i1ne70106.html

Co‐Creating an Urban Circularity Questionnaire: A Workshop Approach With Experts

Author

Listed:
  • Rengin Aslanoğlu
  • Loredana Ivan
  • Cihan Kayaçetin
  • Qiuxian Li
  • Joost van Hoof
  • Jeroen Dikken

Abstract

As cities strive for sustainable development, the concept of urban circularity is gaining increasing recognition as a framework for systemic transformation. Yet, tools used to assess circularity, such as questionnaires, are often limited to traditional measurement functions. This paper argues that adopting new methods for developing questionnaires can serve as both a mechanism for creating a circularity measurement tool and for initiating conversations with stakeholders. It details a co‐creation process involving international stakeholders (architects, urban planners, local government representatives, and social scientists) in the development of a circularity questionnaire and argues that these should be context‐driven, methodologically sound, and, more importantly, socially accountable tools that include all stakeholders. This paper emphasizes ensuring effective measurements of urban circularity through the participation of all perspectives, improving the development process and the quality of surveys, and increasing stakeholder participation and dialog to effect change and increase insights into circularity practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Rengin Aslanoğlu & Loredana Ivan & Cihan Kayaçetin & Qiuxian Li & Joost van Hoof & Jeroen Dikken, 2026. "Co‐Creating an Urban Circularity Questionnaire: A Workshop Approach With Experts," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70106
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.