IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v56y2025i3ne70046.html

Territorial Servitization and Manufacturing Productivity Growth in Mexico: A Spatial Panel Data Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Antonio Cabrera‐Pereyra

Abstract

While most existing research on territorial servitization has focused on its potential to revitalize mature industrial regions, much less has been said about its potential to incentivize knowledge‐driven changes in manufacturing across developing economies. This article contributes to this topic by analyzing evidence for territorial servitization processes in Mexico, adopting a spatial panel data model approach, which uncovers space‐time patterns to local‐regional servitization processes. Findings reveal servitization positively impacts manufacturing productivity. Results also signal the relevance of local industrial contexts, as well as firm conditions, as key factors to the presence of positive impacts on productivity due to KIBS‐manufacturing linkages, or manufacturing servitization.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Antonio Cabrera‐Pereyra, 2025. "Territorial Servitization and Manufacturing Productivity Growth in Mexico: A Spatial Panel Data Approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:3:n:e70046
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70046
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eduardo Sisti & Arantza Zubiaurre Goena, 2020. "Panel analysis of the creation of new KIBS in Spain: The role of manufacturing and regional innovation systems (RIS)," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 48, pages 37-50.
    2. Manuel Araya & Krisztina Horváth & Juan Carlos Leiva, 2020. "The role of county competitiveness and manufacturing activity on the development of business service sectors: A precursor to territorial servitization," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 48, pages 19-35.
    3. Jens Matthias Arnold & Beata Javorcik & Molly Lipscomb & Aaditya Mattoo, 2016. "Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(590), pages 1-39, February.
    4. Lombardi, Silvia & Santini, Erica & Vecciolini, Claudia, 2022. "Drivers of territorial servitization: An empirical analysis of manufacturing productivity in local value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    5. Lafuente, Esteban & Vaillant, Yancy & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2017. "Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 19-28.
    6. Igor Roberto Amancio & Glauco Henrique de Sousa Mendes & Herick Fernando Moralles & Bruno Brandão Fischer & Eduardo Sisti, 2022. "The interplay between KIBS and manufacturers: a scoping review of major key themes and research opportunities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(10), pages 1919-1941, October.
    7. Jeroen Content & Koen Frenken, 2016. "Related variety and economic development: a literature review," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 2097-2112, December.
    8. Helmut Lütkepohl & Fang Xu, 2012. "The role of the log transformation in forecasting economic variables," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 619-638, June.
    9. Millo, Giovanni & Piras, Gianfranco, 2012. "splm: Spatial Panel Data Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 47(i01).
    10. Kapoor, Mudit & Kelejian, Harry H. & Prucha, Ingmar R., 2007. "Panel data models with spatially correlated error components," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 97-130, September.
    11. Baltagi, Badi H. & Song, Seuck Heun & Koh, Won, 2003. "Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 123-150, November.
    12. Jan Mutl & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2011. "The Hausman test in a Cliff and Ord panel model," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14, pages 48-76, February.
    13. Amado Villarreal Gonzalez & Elizabeth A. Mack & Miguel Flores, 2017. "Industrial complexes in Mexico: implications for regional industrial policy based on related variety and smart specialization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 537-547, April.
    14. John B Parr, 2002. "Agglomeration Economies: Ambiguities and Confusions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(4), pages 717-731, April.
    15. Esteban Lafuente & Yancy Vaillant & Ferran Vendrell-Herrero, 2019. "Territorial servitization and the manufacturing renaissance in knowledge-based economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 313-319, March.
    16. Juliana Bonomi Santos, 2019. "Knowledge-intensive business services and innovation performance in Brazil," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 58-74, September.
    17. Lee, Lung-fei & Yu, Jihai, 2010. "Some recent developments in spatial panel data models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 255-271, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guilherme Resende & Alexandre Carvalho & Patrícia Sakowski & Túlio Cravo, 2016. "Evaluating multiple spatial dimensions of economic growth in Brazil using spatial panel data models," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Roger Bivand & Giovanni Millo & Gianfranco Piras, 2021. "A Review of Software for Spatial Econometrics in R," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-40, June.
    3. Millo, Giovanni, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation of spatially and serially correlated panels with random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 914-933.
    4. Guilherme Mendes Resende & Alexandre Xavier Ywata de Carvalho & Patrícia Alessandra Morita Sakowski, 2013. "Evaluating Multiple Spatial Dimensions of Economic Growth in Brazil Using Spatial Panel Data Models (1970 - 2000)," Discussion Papers 1830a, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    5. Baltagi, Badi H. & Yen, Yin-Fang, 2014. "Hospital treatment rates and spillover effects: Does ownership matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 193-202.
    6. Su, Liangjun & Yang, Zhenlin, 2015. "QML estimation of dynamic panel data models with spatial errors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 230-258.
    7. Haiyong Zhang & Xinyu Wang, 2018. "The impact of structural adjustment on housing prices in China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 32(1), pages 108-119, May.
    8. Anna Gloria Billé & Marco Rogna, 2022. "The effect of weather conditions on fertilizer applications: A spatial dynamic panel data analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 3-36, January.
    9. Gianfranco Piras, 2013. "Efficient GMM Estimation of a Cliff and Ord Panel Data Model with Random Effects," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 370-388, September.
    10. Millo, Giovanni, 2025. "Empirical behaviour of Anselin et al.’s locally robust LM tests for spatial dependence in a panel data setting," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Hasan Engin Duran & Burak Dindaroğlu, 2021. "Regional inflation persistence in Turkey," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 460-491, March.
    12. repec:rri:wpaper:201303 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Frank Davenport, 2017. "Estimating standard errors in spatial panel models with time varying spatial correlation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96, pages 155-177, March.
    14. Samantha Leorato & Maura Mezzetti, 2015. "Spatial Panel Data Model with error dependence: a Bayesian Separable Covariance Approach," CEIS Research Paper 338, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Apr 2015.
    15. Burridge, Peter & Iacone, Fabrizio & Lazarová, Štěpána, 2015. "Spatial effects in a common trend model of US city-level CPI," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 87-98.
    16. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Zofío, José L., 2017. "A Panel Data Toolbox for MATLAB," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i06).
    17. Harald Badinger & Peter Egger, 2013. "Estimation and testing of higher-order spatial autoregressive panel data error component models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 453-489, October.
    18. Nicholas Campisi & Hill Kulu & Júlia Mikolai & Sebastian Klüsener & Mikko Myrskylä, 2020. "A spatial perspective on the Nordic fertility decline: the role of economic and social uncertainty in fertility trends," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-036, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    19. Elzbieta Szulc & Dagna Wleklinska, 2015. "Spatio-temporal Analysis of Convergence of Development Level of Selected Stock Exchanges in the Period of 2004–2012," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 5-26.
    20. Harry H. Kelejian & Gianfranco Piras, 2013. "A J-Test for Panel Models with Fixed Effects, Spatial and Time," Working Papers Working Paper 2013-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    21. Elzbieta Szulc & Dagna Wleklinska & Karolina Gorna & Joanna Gorna, 2014. "The significance of distance between stock exchanges undergoing the process of convergence: An analysis of selected world stock exchanges during the period of 2004-2012," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 14, pages 125-144.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:3:n:e70046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.