IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023is4p67-76.html

Debunking the autocratic fallacy? Improving public goods delivery in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Fröhlich

Abstract

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has not only deeply challenged Russia's international standing but has also endangered its fragile domestic order. Data from the 2022 Berggruen Governance Index reveals that overall state capacity has been stagnating at a fairly low level since the beginning of the millennium, while democratic accountability has been declining steadily and profoundly. In contrast, the provision of public goods has strongly increased during the same period. This puts the assumption of the ‘autocratic fallacy’—the idea that sustained public goods delivery relies on democratic accountability in the long run—to the test. We argue that Russia's resource abundance allowed for the maintenance of a regime‐supporting social contract with the population. However, the basis of that contract has changed significantly due to economic decline, fired by, among other factors, several waves of sanctions and the costs of war and will press the Russian government to find urgent solutions to sustain a high level of public goods provision under such unfavourable conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Fröhlich, 2023. "Debunking the autocratic fallacy? Improving public goods delivery in Russia," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S4), pages 67-76, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:s4:p:67-76
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorentzen, Peter L., 2013. "Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 8(2), pages 127-158, February.
    2. Mazaheri, Nimah, 2017. "Oil, Dissent, and Distribution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 186-202.
    3. Nye, John V.C. & Vasilyeva, Olga, 2015. "When does local political competition lead to more public goods?: Evidence from Russian regions," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 650-676.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin van Rooij & Rachel E. Stern & Kathinka Fürst, 2016. "The authoritarian logic of regulatory pluralism: Understanding China's new environmental actors," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 3-13, March.
    2. Bosco, Davide & Colombo, Luca & Femminis, Gianluca, 2025. "Conflict, information and regime-change," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Kvartiuk, Vasyl & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2021. "Redistributive politics in Russia: The political economy of agricultural subsidies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 1-30.
    4. Yu Bai & Yanjun Li & Hamza Umer, 2026. "Corruption disclosure and its impact on labour‐related actions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 93(370), pages 377-402, April.
    5. Mattingly, Daniel, 2024. "Response to Jetter and Swasito (2024)," I4R Discussion Paper Series 179, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    6. Tadadjeu, Sosson & Njangang, Henri & Ningaye, Paul & Nourou, Mohammadou, 2020. "Linking natural resource dependence and access to water and sanitation in African countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2024. "The Political Economics of Non-democracy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 594-636, June.
    8. Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2014. "Incumbency Advantage in Non-Democracies," NBER Working Papers 20519, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Frye, Timothy & Borisova, Ekaterina, 2016. "Elections, protest and trust in government: A natural experiment from Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/2016, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    10. Andrew T Little, 2017. "Are non-competitive elections good for citizens?," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(2), pages 214-242, April.
    11. Cathrin Mohr, 2023. "Carrots and Sticks: Targeting the Opposition in an Autocratic Regime," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 236, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    12. Chen Li & Shenjing He, 2023. "‘Carrot and stick’ approach to housing demolition and relocation under flexible authoritarianism in urban China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. May Chu, 2020. "Horses for courses: China's accommodative approach to food standard‐setting in response to the internationalization of regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 514-530, July.
    14. Sosson Tadadjeu & Brice Kamguia & Ronald Djeunankan, 2023. "Access to drinking water and sanitation in developing countries: Does financial development matter?," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 457-481, July.
    15. Anton Bogs, 2026. "Participation Disenchants: How Online Political Participation Decreases Online Political Efficacy in China," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 35-63, January.
    16. Georgy Lukyanov, 2025. "The welfare effects of policy signalling in a regime change game," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 13(2), pages 291-303, October.
    17. Vasilyeva, Olga & Libman, Alexander, 2020. "Varieties of authoritarianism matter: Elite fragmentation, natural resources and economic growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Theodore Charm, 2025. "Beliefs, strategic interaction, and Hong Kong’s anti-extradition law movement: A game-theoretic analysis," Rationality and Society, , vol. 37(1), pages 35-64, February.
    19. Sonin, Konstantin & Egorov, Georgy, 2019. "Persuasion on Networks," CEPR Discussion Papers 13723, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Tao Wu & Lin Gui & Liguo Zhang & Chih-Chun Kung, 2023. "Information Jamming and Capture Cost: A Global Game Analysis of Collective Action," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:s4:p:67-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.