IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v29y2022i4p1113-1131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizing male infertility: Masculinities and fertility treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Cervi
  • David Knights

Abstract

This paper explores how organizations within the fertility treatment sector in the UK discursively construct (cis) male infertility and whether, in so doing, they reinforce or reproduce prevailing institutionalized discourses and practices of masculinity. We seek to address the gender disparity in contemporary understandings of reproductive health in Organization Studies (OS) where women's experience of infertility and its impact is well researched, but only occasionally does this extend to issues of male infertility. Specifically, we build on existing literature in the social sciences and OS on male infertility and expand it by investigating the organizations that treat fertility issues. We examine and discuss how they may inadvertently contribute to this neglect, by reflecting and reproducing the masculine norms that surround male infertility. We employ a thematic analysis to examine texts produced by organizations involved in the fertility sector and find that male infertility is discussed and presented through three intersecting lenses: (a) a hegemonic masculinization of infertility; (b) male infertility as an othering experience; and (c) disembodied masculinity. We highlight how these gendered organizational narratives (re)produce prevailing norms and practices of masculinity, and how an organizational shift within the sector needs to take place if substantial changes toward more caring, relational, and collective approaches to gender and reproductive health are to be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Cervi & David Knights, 2022. "Organizing male infertility: Masculinities and fertility treatment," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1113-1131, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:4:p:1113-1131
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12809
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieke Brink & Yvonne Benschop, 2014. "Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 460-492, May.
    2. Esmée Hanna & Brendan Gough, 2015. "Experiencing Male Infertility," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    3. David Knights & Alison Pullen, 2019. "Masculinity: A contested terrain?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(10), pages 1367-1375, October.
    4. Emilia Kangas & Anna‐Maija Lämsä & Marjut Jyrkinen, 2019. "Is fatherhood allowed? Media discourses of fatherhood in organizational life," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(10), pages 1433-1450, October.
    5. Gannon, Kenneth & Glover, Lesley & Abel, Paul, 2004. "Masculinity, infertility, stigma and media reports," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 1169-1175, September.
    6. Martina Dickson & James Dickson, 2021. "“Story time is my duty”: Expatriate academic fathers' experiences of balancing their work and home lives," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 2235-2251, November.
    7. Karin Schwiter & Julia Nentwich & Marisol Keller, 2021. "Male privilege revisited: How men in female‐dominated occupations notice and actively reframe privilege," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 2199-2215, November.
    8. David Knights, 2019. "Gender still at work: Interrogating identity in discourses and practices of masculinity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 18-30, January.
    9. Emmanouela Mandalaki, 2021. "Searching for “home,” writing to find it: A reflective account on experiences of othering in life and academia in times of generalized crises," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 835-848, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clare Mumford & Krystal Wilkinson & Michael Carroll, 2023. "“Potential parenthood” and identity threats: Navigating complex fertility journeys alongside work and employment," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 982-998, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Alcadipani, 2020. "Pandemic and macho organizations: Wake‐up call or business as usual?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 734-746, September.
    2. Esmée Hanna & Brendan Gough, 2020. "The impact of infertility on men's work and finances: Findings from a qualitative questionnaire study," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 581-591, July.
    3. Vanda Papafilippou & Susan Durbin & Hazel Conley, 2022. "Women's formal networking: The relationship between networking activities and power," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1712-1741, September.
    4. A. E. M. Liljas & N. K. Jensen & J. Pulkki & I. Andersen & I. Keskimäki & B. Burström & J. Agerholm, 2022. "The influence of sociodemographic factors and close relatives at hospital discharge and post hospital care of older people with complex care needs: nurses’ perceptions on health inequity in three Nord," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 189-200, June.
    5. Shoshana Grossbard & Tansel Yilmazer & Lingrui Zhang, 2018. "The Gender Gap in Citations: Lessons from Demographic Economics Journals," Working Papers 2018-078, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    6. Pipiet Larasatie & Dagmar Karisch-Gierer & Alice Ludvig, 2022. "Women’s Woodland Owner Network: A Comparative Case Study of Oregon (the United States) and Austria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Mark Gatto, 2022. "Sharing care: Equal and primary fathers and early years parenting," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 693-696, March.
    8. Jiale Yang & Qing Wu & Chuanyi Wang, 2022. "Research networks and the initial placement of PhD holders in academia: evidence from social science fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3253-3278, June.
    9. D. Checchi & S. Cicognani & N. Kulic, 2015. "Gender quotas or girls networks? Towards an understanding of recruitment in the research profession in Italy," Working Papers wp1047, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    10. Laurie Cohen & Joanne Duberley & Beatriz Adriana Bustos Torres, 2023. "Experiencing Gender Regimes: Accounts of Women Professors in Mexico, the UK and Sweden," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 525-544, April.
    11. Herschberg, Channah & Benschop, Yvonne & van den Brink, Marieke, 2018. "Precarious postdocs: A comparative study on recruitment and selection of early-career researchers," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 303-310.
    12. Costa, Carlos & Bakas, Fiona Eva & Breda, Zélia & Durão, Marília & Carvalho, Inês & Caçador, Sandra, 2017. "Gender, flexibility and the ‘ideal tourism worker’," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 64-75.
    13. Sofia Moratti, 2020. "Do Low-Openness, Low-Transparency Procedures in Academic Hiring Disadvantage Women?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Angel Ellul Fenech & Shireen Kanji & Zsuzsanna Vargha, 2022. "Gender‐based exclusionary practices in performance appraisal," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 427-442, March.
    15. Marita Haas & Sabine T. Koeszegi & Eva Zedlacher, 2016. "Breaking Patterns? How Female Scientists Negotiate their Token Role in their Life Stories," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 397-413, July.
    16. Rafael Alcadipani & Dennis Pacheco Lopes da Silva & Samira Bueno & Renato Sergio de Lima, 2021. "Making black lives don't matter via organizational strategies to avoid the racial debate: The military police in Brazil," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1683-1696, July.
    17. Mathias Wullum Nielsen, 2017. "Reasons for Leaving the Academy: a Case Study on the ‘Opt Out’ Phenomenon among Younger Female Researchers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 134-155, March.
    18. Bornstein, Marta & Gipson, Jessica D. & Failing, Gates & Banda, Venson & Norris, Alison, 2020. "Individual and community-level impact of infertility-related stigma in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Yvonne Benschop & Patricia Lewis & Ruth Simpson & Patricia Lewis & Yvonne Benschop & Ruth Simpson, 2017. "Postfeminism, Gender and Organization," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 213-225, May.
    20. Claudia Balan & Marieke van den Brink & Yvonne Benschop, 2023. "New fathers, ideal workers? New players in the field of father‐friendly work organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 957-981, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:4:p:1113-1131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.