IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econpa/v40y2021i1p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A View From The Top: Deans on Australian Business Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Owen Hogan
  • Michael B. Charles
  • Michael A. Kortt

Abstract

Australian business schools are often viewed by senior university managers as 'cash cows' because of their revenue‐raising capacity. However, a competing view has emerged that challenges their status as 'cash cows' and contends, instead, that business schools should focus on maximising 'public value' as a means to enhance their legitimacy. Using the analytic framework of 'public value,' a broad cross section of Australian business schools deans was interviewed. These interviews afforded a greater understanding of how the tensions inherent in these competing narratives are reconciled, and how they impact on the day‐to‐day management of business schools in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Owen Hogan & Michael B. Charles & Michael A. Kortt, 2021. "A View From The Top: Deans on Australian Business Schools," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 40(1), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:40:y:2021:i:1:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1111/1759-3441.12290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12290
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1759-3441.12290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Pfeffer & Christina T. Fong, 2004. "The Business School ‘Business’: Some Lessons from the US Experience," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1501-1520, December.
    2. Pucciarelli, Francesca & Kaplan, Andreas, 2016. "Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-320.
    3. Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Fong, Christina T., 2004. "The Business School "Business": Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience," Research Papers 1855, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Katrin Muff & Thomas Dyllick & Mark Drewell & John North & Paul Shrivastava & Jonas Haertle, 2013. "Management Education For the World: A Vision for Business School Serving People and Planet," Post-Print hal-01514517, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John M T Balmer & Wei-Yue Wang, 2016. "The corporate brand and strategic direction: Senior business school managers’ cognitions of corporate brand building and management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 8-21, January.
    2. Ellson, Tony, 2009. "Assessing contribution of research in business to practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1160-1164, November.
    3. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    4. André, Kévin, 2013. "Why Should Business Education Care About Care? Toward an Educare Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers WP1315, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    5. Ofer H. Azar & David M. Brock, 2008. "A Citation‐Based Ranking of Strategic Management Journals," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 781-802, September.
    6. Mike Wright & Evila Piva & Simon Mosey & Andy Lockett, 2009. "Academic entrepreneurship and business schools," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 560-587, December.
    7. Stephen M. Soffe & Michael J. Marquardt & Enoch Hale, 2011. "Action learning and critical thinking: a synthesis of two models," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 211-230, August.
    8. Hervé Goy & Gaelle Dechamp, 2008. "Le contrat d'établissement : un dispositif de gestion stratégique pour les universités françaises ?," Post-Print halshs-00676044, HAL.
    9. Manuel Hensmans & van Bommel, 2019. "Brexit, the NHS and the double-edged sword of populism: Contributor to agonistic democracy or vehicle of ressentiment?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/291153, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Albrecht, W. Steve & Hoopes, Jeff, 2009. "An empirical assessment of commercial web-based professor evaluation services," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 125-132.
    11. Luis Antonio Orozco Castro, 2015. "Diversidad y heterogeneidad en redes de colaboración científica. Un estudio de las escuelas de administración de América Latina," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, edition 1, number 44, spring.
    12. Matthias Hühn, 2014. "You Reap What You Sow: How MBA Programs Undermine Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 527-541, June.
    13. P Naudé & S Henneberg & Z Jiang, 2010. "Varying routes to the top: identifying different strategies in the MBA marketplace," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(8), pages 1193-1206, August.
    14. Corinne Bendersky & Nicholas A. Hays, 2012. "Status Conflict in Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-340, April.
    15. Aithal, Architha & Aithal, Sreeramana, 2018. "How and Why Wharton Business School became World Topper – A Case Study on Organizational Quest for Excellence of First US Business School," MPRA Paper 85727, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Lise Arena & Rani Jeanne Dang, 2010. "Learning lessons from the past: A historical exploration of a century of business education at Oxford and Cambridge (1900s-2000s)," Post-Print halshs-00721623, HAL.
    17. Lloyd P. Steier & John L. Ward, 2006. "If Theories of Family Enterprise Really Do Matter, So Does Change in Management Education," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 887-895, November.
    18. Corinne Bendersky & Neha Parikh Shah, 2012. "The Cost of Status Enhancement: Performance Effects of Individuals' Status Mobility in Task Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 308-322, April.
    19. André Habisch & Claudius Bachmann, 2016. "Empowering practical wisdom from religious traditions: a ricoeurian approach," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Timothy Clark & Steven W. Floyd & Mike Wright, 2013. "In Search of the Impactful and the Interesting: Swings of the Pendulum?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1358-1373, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:40:y:2021:i:1:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.