IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v42y2022i1p30-49.html

Private regulation versus government regulation: The example of financial markets

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Booth

Abstract

Economists generally study financial regulation in a ‘market failure’ context. Market failures, as defined in undergraduate textbooks, are identified and government action is proposed to remedy those failures. Quite apart from objections to the market‐failure model that can come from many perspectives, this approach ignores the ways in which regulatory institutions can develop within financial markets. Indeed, such institutions were the norm in the UK until the mid‐1980s, and they still exist today. This article proposes that economists should take this observed reality into account. When considering the appropriateness of government intervention, they should first study the relative advantages and disadvantages of private and government regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Booth, 2022. "Private regulation versus government regulation: The example of financial markets," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 30-49, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:42:y:2022:i:1:p:30-49
    DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.12512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12512
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecaf.12512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan Bourne, 2019. "‘Market failure’ arguments are a poor guide to policy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 170-183, June.
    2. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 641-672, June.
    3. Booth, P.M., 1997. "The Political Economy of Regulation," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 675-707, August.
    4. Stringham, Edward Peter, 2015. "Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199365166.
    5. Bellis, C.S., 2000. "Professions in Society," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 317-364, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Booth, Philip, 2019. "Regulation without the state: The example of financial services," IEA Discussion Papers 97, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
    2. Trent J. MacDonald, 2019. "The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18871, March.
    3. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, October.
    5. March, Raymond J., 2017. "Skin in the game: comparing the private and public regulation of isotretinoin," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 649-672, September.
    6. Palagashvili,Liya & Piano,Ennio & Skarbek,David, 2017. "The Decline and Rise of Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316649176, January.
    7. Eloi Laurent & Jean Jouzel, 2018. "The Well-being Transition: Measuring what counts to protect what matters," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03458057, HAL.
    8. Erwin Dekker, 2020. "On emancipators, engineers, and students: The appropriate attitude of the economist," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 55-68, March.
    9. Cooper, Mark, 2018. "Governing the global climate commons: The political economy of state and local action, after the U.S. flip-flop on the Paris Agreement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 440-454.
    10. Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Gallemore, Caleb & Dwisatrio, Bimo & Maharani, Cynthia D. & Muharrom, Efrian & Pham, Thuy Thu, 2020. "REDD+ in Indonesia: A new mode of governance or just another project?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Yubo Liao & Bangbang Zhang & Xiangbin Kong & Liangyou Wen & Dongheng Yao & Yuxuan Dang & Wenguang Chen, 2022. "A Cooperative-Dominated Model of Conservation Tillage to Mitigate Soil Degradation on Cultivated Land and Its Effectiveness Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Górriz-Mifsud, Elena & Olza Donazar, Luis & Montero Eseverri, Eduardo & Marini Govigli, Valentino, 2019. "The challenges of coordinating forest owners for joint management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 100-109.
    13. David Wilson & John Gowdy, 2015. "Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 37-52, April.
    14. Kaori Tembata & Kenji Takeuchi, 2016. "Collective decision-making under drought: An empirical study of water resource management in Japan," Discussion Papers 1646, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    15. Daniel J. D’Amico, 2018. "The law and economics of sycophancy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 424-439, December.
    16. Abootorabi, Hooman & Wiklund, Johan & Johnson, Alan R. & Miller, Cameron D., 2021. "A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    17. Thomas A. Hemphill, 2018. "Review of Progressive Business: An Intellectual History of the Role of Business in American History by Christian Olaf Christiansen," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 263-265, April.
    18. McCloskey Deirdre Nansen, 2018. "The Two Movements in Economic Thought, 1700–2000: Empty Economic Boxes Revisited," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Emrah Karakilic, 2022. "Rentierism and the commons: A critical contribution to Brett Christophers’ Rentier Capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 422-429, March.
    20. Martin G. Kocher & Fangfang Tan & Jing Yu, 2018. "Providing Global Public Goods: Electoral Delegation And Cooperation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 381-397, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:42:y:2022:i:1:p:30-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.