IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i2ne12828.html

Proxy means test for targeting welfare benefits in Jamaica

Author

Listed:
  • Garfield O. Blake
  • Godfrey Gibbison

Abstract

Motivation The proxy means test (PMT) has become the predominant targeting mechanism for social assistance schemes in many low‐ and lower‐middle income countries, including Jamaica. It has many powerful advocates amid claims that it can accurately and cost‐effectively target the poor. However, recently, there have been concerns expressed by beneficiary groups, government stakeholders, and civil society on the selection of households for benefits under Jamaica's Programme of Advancement Through Health and Education (PATH). Purpose An evaluation of PATH suggests that it covers only about 71% of households ranked in the poorest quintiles, while 23% of programme beneficiaries are from households considered to be non‐poor (ranked in the top two quintiles). This study introduces innovations to the current PMT model with the objective of improving targeting of the poor for social protection benefits. Approach and methods We draw on data collected by the Statistical Institute of Jamaica (STATIN) regarding the PATH programme to show that an application of the poverty‐weighted least squares regression estimation method improves coverage of households ranked in the poorest quintiles. Poverty‐weighted least squares places higher weights on the squared errors of poor households, which avoids the tendency of least squares regression to increase the predicted consumption of the poor. Findings Using data compiled by the STATIN through the annual Jamaica Survey of Living Conditions, we showed that the construction of a national model estimated using poverty‐weighted least squares, and adjusting predicted consumption to the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval, improves coverage of the poorest households from 71% to over 85%. Achieving this high rate of coverage among the poor came at a cost, in the form of high coverage among the non‐poor and, particularly, an increase in inclusion errors. Policy implications We believe these results demonstrate that in certain contexts it is possible to improve upon the Basic PMT model and meet the goals the PMT was intended to achieve, efficiently directing social assistance to the poor, minimizing leakage to the non‐poor, and maintaining integrity in the overall social assistance mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Garfield O. Blake & Godfrey Gibbison, 2025. "Proxy means test for targeting welfare benefits in Jamaica," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(2), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:2:n:e12828
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12828
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Ziliak, 2015. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 1, pages 303-393, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Skoufias, Emmanuel & de la Vega, Sergio & Davis, Benjamin, 2001. "Targeting the poor in Mexico: an evaluation of the selection of households for PROGRESA," FCND discussion papers 103, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. David Coady & Margaret Grosh & John Hoddinott, 2004. "Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries : Review of Lessons and Experience," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14902, October.
    4. Garfield O. Blake & Godfrey Gibbison, 2015. "Why do poor households not apply for welfare benefits? evidence from Jamaicas path program," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(1), pages 65-82, January-M.
    5. Skoufias, Emmanuel & Davis, Benjamin & de la Vega, Sergio, 2001. "Targeting The Poor In Mexico: An Evaluation Of The Selection Of Households For Progresa," FCND Discussion Papers 16463, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Hillebrecht, Michael & Klonner, Stefan & Pacere, Noraogo A., 2023. "The dynamics of poverty targeting," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Skoufias, Emmanuel & Davis, Benjamin & de la Vega, Sergio, 2001. "Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1769-1784, October.
    8. Jules Gazeaud, 2020. "Proxy Means Testing Vulnerability to Measurement Errors?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 2113-2133, November.
    9. Carlo del Ninno & Bradford Mills, 2015. "Safety Nets in Africa : Effective Mechanisms to Reach the Poor and Most Vulnerable [Les filets sociaux en Afrique]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21369, October.
    10. Brown, Caitlin & Ravallion, Martin & van de Walle, Dominique, 2018. "A poor means test? Econometric targeting in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 109-124.
    11. repec:bla:devpol:v:24:y:2006:i:5:p:513-536 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Hoeschle & Shuang Liu & Xiaohua Yu, 2025. "Let the Poor Talk About “Poverty”: Revisiting Poverty Alleviation in Rural China With Machine Learning," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    2. Quentin Stoeffler & Francis Fontshi & Aimé Lungela, 2020. "Targeting in Practice: A Review of Existing Mechanisms for Beneficiary Selection in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 824-829, July.
    3. Mora-Rivera, Jorge & García-Mora, Fernando & Cavazos-Castro, Manuel, 2025. "When “more is less”: Connecting for a better life in rural Mexico," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    4. Baez, Javier E. & Kshirsagar, Varun & Skoufias, Emmanuel, 2024. "Drought-sensitive targeting and child growth faltering in Southern Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Ranucci, Immacolata & Abay, Kibrom A. & Tiberti, Luca, 2025. "Perceived need and measured well-being: How well do subjective rankings capture relative poverty?," GSSP working papers 2386, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Caitlin Brown & Martin Ravallion & Dominique van de Walle, 2019. "Most of Africa's Nutritionally Deprived Women and Children are Not Found in Poor Households," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(4), pages 631-644, October.
    7. Della Guardia, Anne & Lake, Milli & Schnitzer, Pascale, 2022. "Selective inclusion in cash transfer programs: Unintended consequences for social cohesion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Rolando Gonzales Martinez & Mariza Cooray, 2025. "Enhancing Poverty Targeting with Spatial Machine Learning: An application to Indonesia," Papers 2503.04300, arXiv.org.
    9. Beltramo, Theresa P. & Calvi, Rossella & De Giorgi, Giacomo & Sarr, Ibrahima, 2023. "Child poverty among refugees," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Brown, Caitlin & Calvi, Rossella & Penglase, Jacob, 2021. "Sharing the pie: An analysis of undernutrition and individual consumption in Bangladesh," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. John A. Maluccio, 2009. "Household targeting in practice: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 1-23.
    12. Juviliana Pereira Corrêa & Marcel Toledo Vieira & Ricardo Silva Freguglia & Admir Antônio Betarelli Junior, 2023. "Focus on cash transfer programs: assessing the eligibility of the Bolsa Família program in Brazil," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1247-1271, April.
    13. Kate Pruce, 2023. "The Politics of Who Gets What and Why: Learning from the Targeting of Social Cash Transfers in Zambia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(4), pages 820-839, August.
    14. repec:wbk:wbrwps:10241 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gilligan, Daniel O. & Veiga, Alinne, 2003. "An Evaluation Of Geographic Targeting In Bolsa Alimentação In Brazil," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21915, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Abay, Kibrom A. & Berhane, Guush & Gilligan, Daniel O. & Tafere, Kibrom & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2026. "Targeting social assistance in fragile settings: An experiment in community-based targeting," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Brown, Caitlin & Ravallion, Martin & van de Walle, Dominique, 2018. "A poor means test? Econometric targeting in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 109-124.
    18. Yuriko Takahashi, 2017. "Varieties of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America," Working Papers 1619, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    19. Henderson, Heath & Follett, Lendie, 2022. "Targeting social safety net programs on human capabilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Emily Aiken & Anik Ashraf & Joshua Blumenstock & Raymond Guiteras & Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak, 2025. "Scalable Targeting of Social Protection: When Do Algorithms Out-Perform Surveys and Community Knowledge?," NBER Working Papers 33919, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Ravallion, Martin, 2019. "Guaranteed employment or guaranteed income?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 209-221.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:2:n:e12828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.