IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/povpop/v17y2025i2ne70005.html

Let the Poor Talk About “Poverty”: Revisiting Poverty Alleviation in Rural China With Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Hoeschle
  • Shuang Liu
  • Xiaohua Yu

Abstract

To tackle lasting rural poverty and fully eradicate absolute poverty by 2020, the Chinese government introduced the “targeted poverty alleviation” (TPA) policy in 2013. Quantitative assessments prove the policy's success; yet multidimensional aspects and subjective perceptions of rural poverty are insufficiently accounted for. This study identifies discrepancies between the official eradication of poverty in China and households' subjective perceptions of the remaining dimensions of rural poverty through a qualitative analysis of the voices of rural residents. Drawing on data from focus group interviews in Hebei province, we employ a mixed‐method approach combining computational text mining and diagnostic qualitative data analysis. Identified key dimensions of rural poverty are insufficient income owing to the lack of ample employment opportunities, limited possibilities of income diversification, and the overall lag of rural economic development in the area of investigation; the shortage of supply of social security services, such as health care and pensions; and induced urban migration. Subjective perceptions of poverty entail components of absolute and relative poverty. The potential of the TPA to achieve long‐term and sustainable poverty alleviation is called into question, as structural root causes of rural poverty are insufficiently addressed. 为解决农村长期贫困问题并在2020年彻底消除绝对贫困, 中国政府于2013年出台了“精准扶贫”政策。定量评估证明了该政策的成功, 然而, 农村贫困的多维方面和主观感知尚未得到充分考虑。本研究通过对农村居民谈话进行定性分析, 识别了中国官方的贫困消除与“家庭对农村贫困其他维度的主观感知”之间的一系列差异。通过分析来自河北省的焦点小组访谈数据, 我们采用了一种由计算文本挖掘和诊断性定性数据分析组成的混合方法。识别的农村贫困关键维度包括:由于缺乏充足的就业机会而导致的收入不足、收入多样化的可能性有限、以及调查地区农村经济发展的总体滞后;医疗保健和养老服务等社会保障的供给短缺, 以及导致的城市流动。贫困的主观感知包括绝对贫困和相对贫困。由于农村贫困的结构性根源没有得到充分解决, 精准扶贫政策在实现长期且可持续减贫方面的潜力受到质疑。 Para abordar la pobreza rural persistente y erradicar por completo la pobreza absoluta para el año 2020, el gobierno chino emitió la política de “Alivio de la Pobreza Focalizada” (TPA, por sus siglas en inglés) en 2013. Las evaluaciones cuantitativas demuestran el éxito de la política, pero los aspectos multidimensionales y las percepciones subjetivas de la pobreza rural no se tienen suficientemente en cuenta. Este estudio identifica discrepancias entre la erradicación oficial de la pobreza en China y las percepciones subjetivas de los hogares sobre las dimensiones restantes de la pobreza rural a través del análisis cualitativo de las voces de los residentes rurales. Analizando datos de entrevistas de grupos focales en la provincia de Hebei, empleamos un enfoque de método mixto compuesto por minería de texto computacional y análisis de datos cualitativos de diagnóstico. Las dimensiones clave identificadas de la pobreza rural son los ingresos insuficientes debido a la falta de amplias oportunidades de empleo, las posibilidades limitadas de diversificación de ingresos y el rezago general del desarrollo económico rural en el área de investigación; la escasez de oferta de seguridad social, como atención médica y servicios de pensiones; y la migración urbana inducida. Las percepciones subjetivas de la pobreza implican componentes de pobreza absoluta y relativa. Se pone en duda el potencial del TPA para lograr un alivio de la pobreza sostenible y a largo plazo, ya que no se abordan suficientemente las causas estructurales de la pobreza rural.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Hoeschle & Shuang Liu & Xiaohua Yu, 2025. "Let the Poor Talk About “Poverty”: Revisiting Poverty Alleviation in Rural China With Machine Learning," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:17:y:2025:i:2:n:e70005
    DOI: 10.1002/pop4.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pop4.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4713 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anand, Sudhir & Segal, Paul & Stiglitz, Joseph E. (ed.), 2010. "Debates on the Measurement of Global Poverty," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199558049.
    3. Dong, Yongqing & Luo, Renfu & Zhang, Linxiu & Liu, Chengfang & Bai, Yunli, 2019. "Intergenerational transmission of education: The case of rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 311-323.
    4. Skoufias, Emmanuel & Davis, Benjamin & de la Vega, Sergio, 2001. "Targeting The Poor In Mexico: An Evaluation Of The Selection Of Households For Progresa," FCND Discussion Papers 16463, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Yixiao Zhou & Ligang Song, 2016. "Income inequality in China: causes and policy responses," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 186-208, May.
    6. Martin Ravallion & Michael Lokshin, 2001. "Identifying Welfare Effects from Subjective Questions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 68(271), pages 335-357, August.
    7. Martin Ravallion, 2011. "On multidimensional indices of poverty," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(2), pages 235-248, June.
    8. Foster, James E, 1998. "Absolute versus Relative Poverty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(2), pages 335-341, May.
    9. Jr‐Tsung Huang & Ming‐Lei Chang, 2020. "The impact of unequal regional distribution of fiscal resources on China’s post‐reform economic growth," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(2), pages 226-241, March.
    10. Huifu Nong & Qing Zhang & Hongjia Zhu & Rong Zhu, 2022. "Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Children’s Academic Performance in China," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 951-969, December.
    11. John A. Bishop & Feijun Luo & Xi Pan, 2006. "Economic Transition And Subjective Poverty In Urban China," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 52(4), pages 625-641, December.
    12. Sen, Amartya K, 1976. "Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 219-231, March.
    13. Chen, Shaohua & Ravallion, Martin, 2021. "Reconciling the conflicting narratives on poverty in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Chang, Qing & Ma, Wanglin & Vatsa, Puneet & Li, Jian, 2022. "Has the Targeted Poverty Alleviation program improved household welfare in rural China?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1041-1056.
    15. Alkire, Sabina & Foster, James, 2011. "Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 476-487.
    16. repec:pri:rpdevs:deaton_price_indexes_inequality_and_the_measurement_of_world_poverty_aer. is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui & Li, Yurui & Li, Jintao, 2018. "Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 595-608.
    18. Dorrit Posel & Michael Rogan, 2014. "Measured as Poor Versus Feeling Poor: Comparing Objective and Subjective Poverty Rates in South Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-133, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Angus Deaton, 2010. "Price Indexes, Inequality, and the Measurement of World Poverty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 5-34, March.
    20. Emmanuelle Lavallée & Anne Olivier & Laure Pasquier-Doumer & Anne-Sophie Robilliard, 2010. "Poverty alleviation policy targeting: a review of experiences in developing countries," Working Papers DT/2010/10, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    21. Tahir Mahmood & Xiaohua Yu & Stephan Klasen, 2019. "Do the Poor Really Feel Poor? Comparing Objective Poverty with Subjective Poverty in Pakistan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 543-580, April.
    22. Karl Pauw, 2022. "A review of Ghana’s planting for food and jobs program: implementation, impacts, benefits, and costs," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1321-1335, October.
    23. Posel, Dorrit & Rogan, Michael, 2014. "Measured as poor versus feeling poor: Comparing objective and subjective poverty rates in South Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 133, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    24. Tiehen, Laura & Jolliffe, Dean & Gundersen, Craig, "undated". "Alleviating Poverty in the United States: The Critical Role of SNAP Benefits," Economic Research Report 262233, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    25. Carvalho, S. & White, H., 1997. "Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis. The Practice and the Potential," Papers 366, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    26. Tian, Xu & Zhang, Xiaoheng & Zhou, Yingheng & Yu, Xiaohua, 2016. "Regional income inequality in China revisited: A perspective from club convergence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 50-58.
    27. Xinhua Qi & Shilin Ye & Yecheng Xu & Jing Chen, 2022. "Uneven dynamics and regional disparity of multidimensional poverty in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 169-189, January.
    28. Skoufias, Emmanuel & de la Vega, Sergio & Davis, Benjamin, 2001. "Targeting the poor in Mexico: an evaluation of the selection of households for PROGRESA," FCND discussion papers 103, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    29. Iryna Kyzyma & Donald R. Williams, 2017. "Public cash transfers and poverty dynamics in Europe," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 485-524, March.
    30. repec:bla:econom:v:68:y:2001:i:271:p:335-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    31. A. Atkinson, 2003. "Multidimensional Deprivation: Contrasting Social Welfare and Counting Approaches," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 1(1), pages 51-65, April.
    32. Jiandong Chen & Sishi Rong & Malin Song, 2021. "Poverty Vulnerability and Poverty Causes in Rural China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 65-91, January.
    33. Skoufias, Emmanuel & Davis, Benjamin & de la Vega, Sergio, 2001. "Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1769-1784, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanjie Wang & Qiran Zhao & Yunli Bai & Linxiu Zhang & Xiaohua Yu, 2020. "Poverty and Subjective Poverty in Rural China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 219-242, July.
    2. Zsoka Koczan, 2022. "Perceptions of economic well‐being in the Western Balkans," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 845-867, October.
    3. Olivier Sterck, 2024. "Poverty Without Poverty Line," CSAE Working Paper Series 2024-07, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    4. Peter Saunders, 2018. "Monitoring and addressing global poverty: A new approach and implications for Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, March.
    5. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Silber, Jacques, 2018. "Multi-dimensional poverty among adults in Central America and gender differences in the three I’s of poverty: Applying inequality sensitive poverty measures with ordinal variables," MPRA Paper 88750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Christophe Muller & Asha Kannan & Roland Alcindor, 2016. "Multidimensional Poverty in Seychelles," Working Papers halshs-01264444, HAL.
    7. Sabina Alkire & James Foster, 2011. "Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(2), pages 289-314, June.
    8. Wulung Hanandita & Gindo Tampubolon, 2016. "Multidimensional Poverty in Indonesia: Trend Over the Last Decade (2003–2013)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 559-587, September.
    9. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Klasen, Stephan, 2018. "Gender and multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: An individual based approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 466-491.
    10. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis, 2019. "Youth Multidimensional Poverty and Its Dynamics: Evidence From Selected Countries In The Mena Region," Working Papers 1339, Economic Research Forum, revised 21 Aug 2019.
    11. Koen Decancq & Marc Fleurbaey & François Maniquet, 2019. "Multidimensional poverty measurement with individual preferences," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(1), pages 29-49, March.
    12. Suman Seth and Gaston Yalonetzky, 2018. "Assessing Deprivation with Ordinal Variables: Depth Sensitivity and Poverty Aversion," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp123.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    13. Udaya Wagle, 2014. "The Counting-Based Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty: The Focus on Economic Resources, Inner Capabilities, and Relational Resources in the United States," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 223-240, January.
    14. Iñaki Permanyer, 2019. "Measuring poverty in multidimensional contexts," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 677-708, December.
    15. Dipesh Gangopadhyay & Robert B. Nielsen & Velma Zahirovic-Herbert, 2021. "Methodology and Axiomatic Characterization of a Multidimensional and Fuzzy Measure of Deprivation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 1-37, January.
    16. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    17. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp066 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. World Bank, 2022. "A Welfarist Theory Unifying Monetary and Non-Monetary Poverty Measurement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10076, The World Bank.
    19. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp065 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Deniz Sevinc, 2020. "How Poor is Poor? A novel look at multidimensional poverty in the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 833-859, June.
    21. Burhan Can Karahasan & Fırat Bilgel, 2021. "The Topography and Sources of Multidimensional Poverty in Turkey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 413-445, April.
    22. Edward Anderson & Lucio Esposito, 2014. "On the joint evaluation of absolute and relative deprivation," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(3), pages 411-428, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:povpop:v:17:y:2025:i:2:n:e70005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-2858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.