IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nccewp/376262.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scalable Targeting of Social Protection: When Do Algorithms Out-Perform Surveys and Community Knowledge?

Author

Listed:
  • Aiken, Emily
  • Ashraf, Anik
  • Blumenstock, Joshua E.
  • Guiteras, Raymond P.
  • Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq

Abstract

Advances in digital data and algorithms are enabling new approaches to poverty targeting at scale. Using rich data from Bangladesh and Togo, we compare an algorithmic approach based on machine learning and mobile phone data to status quo targeting with proxy means tests and community-based targeting. While proxy means tests are most accurate, algorithmic targeting is more cost effective for programs where the budget is small relative to the number of households screened. Combining our estimates with global program data, we estimate that phone-based targeting would be the welfare-maximizing approach for up to 30% of countries’ social assistance programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiken, Emily & Ashraf, Anik & Blumenstock, Joshua E. & Guiteras, Raymond P. & Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq, 2025. "Scalable Targeting of Social Protection: When Do Algorithms Out-Perform Surveys and Community Knowledge?," CEnREP Working Papers 376262, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nccewp:376262
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.376262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/376262/files/WP25-001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.376262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccewp:376262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dancsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.