IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v57y2026i3p421-440.html

The Politics of Passage: Studying Checkpoints and Claim Making in Conflict‐affected Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Peer Schouten
  • Vanessa van den Boogaard
  • Max Gallien
  • Shalaka Thakur
  • Florian Weigand

Abstract

Roadblocks, or checkpoints, are obligatory passage points that are erected by entities claiming authority over a given crossing. They are often the most common everyday interface between civilians and armed actors in conflict‐affected contexts, but are overlooked in studies on either trade or authority amidst conflict. This article, which introduces a special issue on the topic, argues that roadblocks are a useful empirical entry point to questions regarding the practical, political and theoretical interplay of economic circulation and political contestation. It proposes the framework of ‘the politics of passage’, which focuses on the entangled struggles over movement and authority arising from the interaction of a claim to the right of passage and claims to power over it. Through this politics of passage a range of broader social, political and economic claims are made and contested. Within this framework, checkpoints are a privileged field site and useful heuristic device to understand the relationship between trade, conflict and authority in contexts of contested statehood. Roadblocks function as critical nodes where otherwise implicit claims by states and non‐state actors are made explicit in the encounter — or confrontation — between people, capital and goods on the move, and those who claim authority over them. Understanding the nature of these claims, and what shapes the types of claim making that emerge in different contexts, is a central contribution of this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Peer Schouten & Vanessa van den Boogaard & Max Gallien & Shalaka Thakur & Florian Weigand, 2026. "The Politics of Passage: Studying Checkpoints and Claim Making in Conflict‐affected Settings," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 421-440, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:57:y:2026:i:3:p:421-440
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.70067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.70067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meagher, Kate, 2019. "Working in chains: African informal workers and global value chains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91590, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Deutschmann, Emanuel & Gabrielli, Lorenzo & Recchi, Ettore, 2023. "Roads, rails, and checkpoints: Assessing the permeability of nation-state borders worldwide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Lior Volinz, 2021. "Uncertainty as a mode of governance: differentiating movement through Jerusalem’s checkpoints," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 289-305, May.
    4. Peer Schouten & Abdirahman Edle & Jethro Norman, 2026. "Isbaaro: Checkpoints and World Making beyond the State in Somalia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 551-577, May.
    5. Benjamin A. Olken & Patrick Barron, 2009. "The Simple Economics of Extortion: Evidence from Trucking in Aceh," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(3), pages 417-452, June.
    6. Matthew Longo & Daphna Canetti & Nancy Hite‐Rubin, 2014. "A Checkpoint Effect? Evidence from a Natural Experiment on Travel Restrictions in the West Bank," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1006-1023, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peyman Zinati, 2026. "‘Escaping Isn't for Everyone’: Kurdish Smugglers’ Navigational Tactics at Checkpoints in Iran," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 578-598, May.
    2. Jorge A. Mantilla, 2026. "State–Crime Cooperation and Extra‐legal Governance in Colombia and Venezuela," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 599-623, May.
    3. John A. Buchanan, 2026. "Opium Pathways: Mountains, Mules and Resource Extraction in Shan State, Myanmar," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 496-521, May.
    4. Peer Schouten & Abdirahman Edle & Jethro Norman, 2026. "Isbaaro: Checkpoints and World Making beyond the State in Somalia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 551-577, May.
    5. Shalaka Thakur, 2026. "Not‐so‐Freeway: A Relational Approach to Checkpoints and Conflict in Northeast India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 467-495, May.
    6. Tony Neil & Saw Day Chit Htoo, 2026. "Beyond the Rebel ‘Territorial Trap’: Governing Armed Sovereign Formations in Eastern Myanmar," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 441-466, May.
    7. Gerard McCarthy & Kyle Nyana, 2026. "Roadblocks, Relationality and Resilient Resistance in Post‐coup Myanmar," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 57(3), pages 624-646, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanan G. Jacoby & Ghazala Mansuri, 2018. "Governing the Commons? Water and Power in Pakistan’s Indus Basin," Working Papers id:12933, eSocialSciences.
    2. Deniz Aksoy & Andrew Menger & Margit Tavits, 2023. "The Effect of Curfews on Political Preferences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(1), pages 94-121, January.
    3. Hanming Fang, 2024. "Measurements, determinants, causes, and consequences of corruption: lessons from China’s anti-corruption campaign," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 3-25, February.
    4. John Bennett & Matthew D. Rablen, 2021. "Bribery, hold‐up, and bureaucratic structure," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 880-903, July.
    5. Charles Angelucci & Antonio Russo, 2022. "Petty Corruption And Citizen Reports," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 831-848, May.
    6. Jiang, Shuguang & Wei, Qian & Zhao, Lei, 2024. "Synergizing anti-corruption strategies: Group monitoring and endogenous crackdown – An experimental investigation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Timothy Besley & Thiemo Fetzer & Hannes Mueller, 2015. "The Welfare Cost Of Lawlessness: Evidence From Somali Piracy," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 203-239, April.
    8. Nagano, Mamoru, 2013. "Similarities and differences among cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI determinants: Evidence from Asia and Oceania," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 100-118.
    9. Jamie Bologna, 2017. "Contagious corruption, informal employment, and income: evidence from Brazilian municipalities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 67-118, January.
    10. Yael Elster & Asaf Zussman & Noam Zussman, 2019. "Effective Counter‐Terrorism: Rockets, Iron Dome, and the Israeli Housing Market," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 308-337, March.
    11. Jonah B. Gelbach & Doug Miller, 2009. "Robust Inference with Multi-way Clustering," Working Papers 226, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    12. Hoelscher, Kristian & Ainembabazi, Triphine & Mbabazi, Judith & Mukwaya, Paul & Rolandsen, Øystein H., 2025. "“Peace is when we are working”: Insecurity and small business survival in Kampala," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 525-539.
    13. Federico Ceschel & Alessandro Hinna & Fabian Homberg, 2022. "Public Sector Strategies in Curbing Corruption: A Review of the Literature," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 571-591, September.
    14. Ricardo Montero & Gustavo Yamada, 2012. "Exclusión y discriminación étnica en los servicios públicos en el Perú," Chapters of Books, in: Francisco Galarza (ed.), Discriminación en el Perú: Exploraciones en el Estado, la empresa y el mercado laboral., edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 219-278, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico.
    15. Beekman, Gonne & Bulte, Erwin & Nillesen, Eleonora, 2014. "Corruption, investments and contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence from rural Liberia," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 37-47.
    16. Lessmann, Christian & Markwardt, Gunther, 2010. "One Size Fits All? Decentralization, Corruption, and the Monitoring of Bureaucrats," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 631-646, April.
    17. Yujin Jeong & Jordan I. Siegel, 2018. "Threat of falling high status and corporate bribery: Evidence from the revealed accounting records of two South Korean presidents," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1083-1111, April.
    18. Abhijit Banerjee & Esther Duflo & Clément Imbert & Santhosh Mathew & Rohini Pande, 2020. "E-governance, Accountability, and Leakage in Public Programs: Experimental Evidence from a Financial Management Reform in India," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 39-72, October.
    19. Michael Callen & James D. Long, 2015. "Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 354-381, January.
    20. Jean Cartier-Bresson, 2013. "Le pouvoir du positivisme et ses limites : microéconométrie et macroéconométrie actuelles du développement," Working Papers hal-00847005, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:57:y:2026:i:3:p:421-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.