IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/coecpo/v15y1997i3p82-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity Analysis In Benefit Cost Analysis: A Key To Increased Use And Acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • JOHN MERRIFIELD

Abstract

“We must insist that all empirical studies offer convincing evidence of inferential sturdiness.” Sensitivit

Suggested Citation

  • John Merrifield, 1997. "Sensitivity Analysis In Benefit Cost Analysis: A Key To Increased Use And Acceptance," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 82-92, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:82-92
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00480.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00480.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00480.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mendelsohn, Robert & Strang, William J, 1984. "Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertainty: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1096-1099, December.
    2. Robert W. Hahn & Richard L. Schmalensee & Roger Noll & Robert Stavins & Lester B. Lave & George C. Eads & Milton Russell & V. Kerry Smith & Maureen L. Cropper & Paul R. Portney & Kenneth J. Arrow, 1996. "Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation: A Statement of Principles," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 51790, September.
    3. Ramsey, David D, 1969. "On the Social Rate of Discount: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(5), pages 919-924, December.
    4. Usher, Dan, 1969. "On the Social Rate of Discount: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(5), pages 925-929, December.
    5. Jackson, L.A. & Schuchat, A. & Gorsky, R.D. & Wenger, J.D., 1995. "Should college students be vaccinated against meningococcal disease? A cost-benefit analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(6), pages 843-845.
    6. Graham, Daniel A, 1981. "Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(4), pages 715-725, September.
    7. Ginsberg, G.M. & Silverberg, D.S., 1994. "A cost-benefit analysis of legislation for bicycle safety helmets in Israel," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(4), pages 653-656.
    8. Peter Söderbaum, 1991. "Benefit-Cost Analysis. A Political Economy Approach," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 261-263, March.
    9. Louis De Alessi, 1996. "Error and Bias in Benefit-Cost Analysis: HUD's Case for the Wind Rule," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 129-147, Spring/Su.
    10. Kenneth J. Arrow & Robert C. Lind, 1974. "Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 3, pages 54-75, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott Farrow, 2004. "Using Risk Assessment, Benefit‐Cost Analysis, and Real Options to Implement a Precautionary Principle," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 727-735, June.
    2. Junrui Xu & James H. Lambert, 2013. "Distributed travel time savings of a multiscale transportation access management program," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 362-375, September.
    3. Simon Niemeyer & Clive L Spash, 2001. "Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 567-585, August.
    4. Junrui Xu & James H. Lambert, 2015. "Risk‐Cost‐Benefit Analysis for Transportation Corridors with Interval Uncertainties of Heterogeneous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 624-641, April.
    5. Lambert, James H. & Farrington, Mark W., 2007. "Cost–benefit functions for the allocation of security sensors for air contaminants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 930-946.
    6. Barbaros Yet & Christine Lamanna & Keith D Shepherd & Todd S Rosenstock, 2020. "Evidence-based investment selection: Prioritizing agricultural development investments under climatic and socio-political risk using Bayesian networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.
    7. James H. Lambert & Mark W. Farrington, 2006. "Risk‐Based Objectives for the Allocation of Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Air Emissions Sensors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1659-1674, December.
    8. Spash, Clive L. & Vatn, Arild, 2006. "Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 379-388, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Liqun, 2003. "A marginal cost of funds approach to multi-period public project evaluation: implications for the social discount rate," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(7-8), pages 1707-1718, August.
    2. Elkin, Randyl Don, 1971. "An evaluation of benefit-cost analysis as a tool for manpower decision making," ISU General Staff Papers 197101010800005447, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Mark D. Agee & Thomas D. Crocker, 2002. "On Techniques to Value the Impact of Environmental Hazards on Children's Health," NCEE Working Paper Series 200208, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Sep 2002.
    4. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2004. "A Generalized Approach to Multigeneration Project Evaluation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(2), pages 377-396, October.
    5. Scott Farrow & W. Kip Viscusi, 2013. "Towards principles and standards for the benefit–cost analysis of safety," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 5, pages 172-193, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Louis Kaplow, 2006. "Discounting Dollars, Discounting Lives: Intergenerational Distributive Justice and Efficiency," NBER Working Papers 12239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Graham-Tomasi, Theodore & Myers, Robert J., 1989. "On Supply Side Option Value," Staff Papers 13341, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Anne van Aaken & Janis Antonovics & Susan Rose-Ackerman, 2016. "The Limits of Cost/Benefit Analysis When Disasters Loom," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7, pages 56-66, May.
    9. Scott Farrow, 2015. "A comparison of key benefit estimation issues for natural hazards and terrorism: ex ante/ex post valuation and endogenous risk," Chapters, in: Carol Mansfield & V. K. Smith (ed.), Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies, chapter 6, pages 140-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Asafu-Adjaye, John & Adamowicz, Wiktor & Phillips, William, 1989. "Nonmarket Valuation under Uncertainty," Staff Paper Series 232438, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    11. Kutschukian, Jean-Marc, 2008. "A Framework For The Economic Evaluation Of Environmental Science," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6026, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Scott Farrow, 2007. "The Economics Of Homeland Security Expenditures: Foundational Expected Cost‐Effectiveness Approaches," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(1), pages 14-26, January.
    13. Fisher, Anthony & Hanemann, W., 1986. "Information and the Dynamics of Environmental Protection: The Concept of the Critical Period," CUDARE Working Papers 198351, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. M. Menegatti, 2003. "Public Investment and Different Sources of Uncertainty," Economics Department Working Papers 2003-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    15. Robert Delorme, 1976. "A propos du taux d'actualisation du Plan," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 27(1), pages 1-30.
    16. Eduardo Fernández-Arias & Ricardo Hausmann & Ugo Panizza, 2020. "Smart Development Banks," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 395-420, June.
    17. Dyack, Brenda & Greiner, Romy, 2006. "Natural Resource Management and Indigenous Well Being," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139725, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Simon Eckermann & Andrew R. Willan, 2016. "Expected Value of Sample Information with Imperfect Implementation," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(3), pages 282-283, April.
    19. Birgitte Grøgaard & Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2019. "Bringing corporate governance into internalization theory: State ownership and foreign entry strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1310-1337, October.
    20. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:82-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.