IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p1022-1038.html

Investigating the Link Between Eco‐Innovation Ambidexterity and Performances in Low‐End Markets. Does Frugal Innovation Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu
  • Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu
  • Giovanna Ferraro
  • Antonio Thomas

Abstract

The requirements of sustainable development compel companies to invest in the renewal of their products and production processes. However, companies approach this need differently, as the factors that stimulate virtuous behavior can vary. The choices of companies are also influenced by the characteristics of the external context in terms of availability of resources to support the innovation processes and the type of customers. This study investigates the impact of eco‐innovation ambidexterity—balancing exploitative and explorative eco‐innovation—on operational and financial performance in manufacturing firms operating in low‐end markets, traditionally characterized by lower‐than‐average product pricing. It also examines the moderating role of frugal‐innovation orientation in this relationship. Specifically, by applying the ordinary least squares regressions, we focus on a sample of manufacturing SMEs placed in Romania. The history of transition from a planned economy country and the high incidence of SMEs makes Romania an exemplary low‐end market to show the mentioned dynamics. The findings reveal that eco‐innovation ambidexterity positively influences operational performance, while no significant effect is observed for financial performance. Furthermore, frugal‐innovation orientation strengthens the relationship between eco‐innovation ambidexterity and operational performance, while its moderating effect on financial performance remains inconclusive. The results show the importance of eco‐innovation ambidexterity as a dynamic capability for SMEs operating under resource constraints, offering theoretical insights into the innovation–performance relationship. Furthermore, the study offers guidance for managers seeking to balance sustainability with competitiveness in low‐end markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Thomas, 2026. "Investigating the Link Between Eco‐Innovation Ambidexterity and Performances in Low‐End Markets. Does Frugal Innovation Matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1022-1038, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1022-1038
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70212
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Mir Dost & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2024. "Managerial Proactiveness, Frugal Innovation and Firm Performance," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(2), pages 393-417, May.
    3. Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bernardes, Roberto Carlos & Frankwick, Gary L., 2023. "Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    4. Chakravarty, Sanghamitra, 2022. "Resource constrained innovation in a technology intensive sector: Frugal medical devices from manufacturing firms in South Africa," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Qing Cao & Eric Gedajlovic & Hongping Zhang, 2009. "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 781-796, August.
    6. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Doina Popescu & Olguta Anca Orzan, 2020. "Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Sharmelly, Rifat & Ray, Pradeep Kanta, 2021. "Managing resource-constrained innovation in emerging markets: Perspectives from a business model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Enoch Adusei & Tilo Halaszovich & Leonhard Gebhardt, 2025. "Greening the Nexus Between Managerial Innovativeness and Innovation Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: The Mediating Role of Green Ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7016-7032, September.
    9. Lim, Chaisung & Fujimoto, Takahiro, 2019. "Frugal innovation and design changes expanding the cost-performance frontier: A Schumpeterian approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1016-1029.
    10. Ana Clara Berndt & Giancarlo Gomes & Felipe Mendes Borini, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of frugal innovation and operational performance: the role of organizational learning capability and entrepreneurial orientation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(5), pages 1704-1722, January.
    11. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    12. Esra'a M. Alamayreh & Rateb J. Sweis & Bader Y. Obeidat, 2019. "The relationship among innovation, organisational ambidexterity and organisational performance," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(4), pages 554-579.
    13. Wenwen Zhao & Taiwen Feng & Xuexiang Xin & Guangyi Hao, 2021. "How to respond to competitors' green success for improving performance: The moderating role of organizational ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 489-506, January.
    14. Mohammad Iranmanesh & Kavigtha Mohan Kumar & Behzad Foroughi & Reza Kian Mavi & Ng Hui Min, 2021. "The impacts of organizational structure on operational performance through innovation capability: innovative culture as moderator," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1885-1911, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima Shuwaikh & Sami Ben Jabeur & Rodrigo Miguel de Oliveira Gonçalves, 2026. "Dynamic Ambidexterity in Corporate Venture Capital: A Pathway to Green Innovation and Environmental Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5428-5451, May.
    2. Xi, Mengjie & Liu, Yang & Fang, Wei & Feng, Taiwen, 2024. "Intelligent manufacturing for strengthening operational resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A dynamic capability theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    3. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    4. Siying Wang & Haiqing Hu & Xianzhu Wang & Yusheng Wang, 2025. "Dynamic Evolution of Ambidextrous Digital Innovation Capabilities and the Development of Environmental, Social and Governance Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 5833-5857, September.
    5. Feng ZHANG, 2025. "Ambidexterity and Firm Performance: A Literature Review," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(2), pages 391-406, June.
    6. Songsong Cheng & Qunpeng Fan & Yang Song, 2023. "Performance Gap and Innovation Ambidexterity: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Liu, Yi & Liao, Yonghai & Li, Yuan, 2018. "Capability configuration, ambidexterity and performance: Evidence from service outsourcing sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 343-352.
    9. Wang, Qianwen & Liu, Xu & Hu, Miao & Huo, Baofeng, 2024. "A reductionistic or holistic approach? The impacts of fit patterns of supplier and customer integration on company and supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin S. & Venkatesh, Mani & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Benkhati, Imane, 2022. "Building supply chain resilience and efficiency through additive manufacturing: An ambidextrous perspective on the dynamic capability view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. Zhengang Zhang & Yu Shang & Linyuan Cheng & Antao Hu, 2022. "Big Data Capability and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Muhammad Shehryar Shahid & Mokter Hossain & Masoud Karami & Tehreem Anwar, 2024. "Frugal entrepreneurship: A way to seize business opportunities for low-income customers," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 1989-2019, December.
    13. Huayun Wang & Zhuoran Zhang, 2021. "The Influence of Corporate Networks on the Competitive Advantage of High Technology Enterprises in China: The Mediating Effects of Dynamic Capacities and Ambidextrous Combination," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Golam Mostafa Khan & Seyedeh Khadijeh Taghizadeh, & Said Al Riyami & Syed Abidur Rahman & Salem AlAbri, 2025. "Strategic Entrepreneurship Behaviour and the Explorative and Exploitative Innovation of SMEs," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 34(1), pages 74-110, February.
    15. Heracleous, Loizos & Papachroni, Angeliki & Andriopoulos, Constantine & Gotsi, Manto, 2017. "Structural ambidexterity and competency traps: Insights from Xerox PARC," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 327-338.
    16. Kwangsoo Kim & Eun-Hwa Seo & Choo Yeon Kim, 2025. "The Relationships Between Environmental Dynamism, Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Innovation Performance from the Dynamic Capabilities Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Suherman & Florentinus Pambudi Widiatmaka & Fitri Kensiwi & Didik Dwi Suharso & Sukirno & Pranyoto & Susena Karona Cahya & Kundori & Haniek Listyorini & Sapto Supriyanto & Pranoto & Sukrisno, 2024. "Resilience in tourism-based SMEs driven by initiatives and strategies through share value relational capital viewed from a resource-based theory perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Justin B. Ames & Kalle Lyytinen & Andrew K. Schnackenberg & Garima Sharma, 2025. "Charting Research Directions in Organizational Agility: Reconceptualizing the Agility Construct for Systematic Theory Development and Cumulative Empirical Inquiry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(2), pages 331-357, June.
    19. Venugopal, Aparna & Krishnan, T.N. & Upadhyayula, Rajesh Srinivas & Kumar, Manish, 2020. "Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Jing A. Zhang & Conor O’Kane & Denis Griffin, 2025. "What drives micro-entrepreneurs’ value-oriented innovative behavior in microfinance: an entrepreneurial resourcefulness perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 2033-2062, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1022-1038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.