IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i7p8281-8304.html

Accounting for Carbon Emissions Through Green Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Millie Liew
  • June Cao

Abstract

With the growing regulatory interest in supply chain carbon footprint, we provide a foundation for future enquiry into the role of green supply chain management (GSCM) on carbon accounting. We conduct a systematic literature review on a final set of 113 articles published between 2010 and 2024 using the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Our approach comprises a bibliometric descriptive analysis, a thematic analysis based on clusters and the theory, context, and methodology (TCM) framework. The findings highlight the evolution of the field over time, primary publication outlets and subject areas, and the geographical distribution based on author affiliations and research context. Moreover, the thematic analysis reveals the theories, industries, research designs, and dominant themes in the GSCM literature associated with carbon accounting. After a synthesis of the findings, we group prior research based on the interconnected dimensions of (1) theoretical vs. empirical, (2) green supply chain flows, and (3) the level of analysis. Finally, we construct a comprehensive future research agenda based on existing knowledge gaps identified using the structured framework. This review presents key implications for both academia and industry in advancing GSCM practices to align with evolving carbon accounting requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Millie Liew & June Cao, 2025. "Accounting for Carbon Emissions Through Green Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8281-8304, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:8281-8304
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:8281-8304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.