IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i4p4312-4324.html

Sustainability Orientation and Innovation Speed: The Moderating Effects of Competitive Intensity and R&D Agility

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Adomako
  • Nguyen Phong Nguyen

Abstract

This article explores the contingent factors that shape the relationship between sustainability orientation and innovation speed. Although the body of research on sustainability orientation is growing, a lack of studies focusing on the contextual and boundary conditions affecting sustainability orientation. Additionally, little is known about how sustainability orientation influences innovation speed in emerging markets. To address this, we expand the literature by developing and testing a model that examines the moderating effects of R&D agility and competitive intensity on the link between sustainability orientation and innovation speed. Specifically, we investigate how sustainability orientation affects innovation speed and how R&D and perceptions of competitive intensity moderate this effect. Based on time‐lagged data from 257 manufacturing firms in Vietnam, our findings reveal that sustainability orientation negatively influences firms' innovation speed. The results also reveal that R&D agility attenuates the negative impact of sustainability orientation on innovation speed. Furthermore, we observe that the negative relationship between sustainability orientation and innovation speed is weakened when both R&D agility and competitive intensity are high. Our detailed analysis extends the conceptual reach of sustainability orientation and increases its applicability to non‐Western contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Adomako & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2025. "Sustainability Orientation and Innovation Speed: The Moderating Effects of Competitive Intensity and R&D Agility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4312-4324, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4312-4324
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4205
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Lanoie, 2008. "When And Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Papers 2008n-02a, CIRANO.
    2. John Antonakis & Samuel Bendahan & Philippe Jacquart & Rafael Lalive, 2010. "On making causal claims : A review and recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313119, HAL.
    3. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    4. Zhang, Jing A. & O'Kane, Conor & Bai, Tao, 2024. "How do university-firm interactions affect firm innovation speed? The case of Chinese science-intensive SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    5. Adomako, Samuel & Tran, Mai Dong, 2022. "Sustainable environmental strategy, firm competitiveness, and financial performance: Evidence from the mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    7. Wendy L. Tate & Lydia Bals, 2018. "Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 803-826, October.
    8. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    9. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    11. Banjo Roxas & Alan Coetzer, 2012. "Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 461-476, December.
    12. Barton H. Hamilton & Jack A. Nickerson & Hideo Owan, 2003. "Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(3), pages 465-497, June.
    13. S. J. Chang, 2016. "Sustainable Evolution for Global Business: A Synthetic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Mrożewski & Aleksandra Dadełło & Charleen von Kolpinski & Olivier Delbard, 2026. "What Drives Impact Scaling? The Roles of Resources, Innovation Performance, and Sustainability Orientation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 282-304, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phong Nguyen, Nguyen & Adomako, Samuel & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2023. "The base-of- the-pyramid orientation and export performance of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Kwabena Frimpong & Samuel Adomako & Nguyen Phong Nguyen & Obaid AI‐Shuridah, 2025. "Sustainability orientation and post‐entry performance: The role of brand and market‐oriented capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1189-1205, January.
    3. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Siying Long & Zhongju Liao, 2021. "Are fiscal policy incentives effective in stimulating firms' eco‐product innovation? The moderating role of dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3095-3104, November.
    5. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Gianluca Biggi & Andrea Mina & Federico Tamagni, 2023. "There are different shades of green: heterogeneous environmental innovations and their effects on firm performance," Papers 2310.08353, arXiv.org.
    7. Esteban Lafuente & Yancy Vaillant & Juan Carlos Leiva, 2018. "Sustainable and Traditional Product Innovation without Scale and Experience, but Only for KIBS!," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Devashish Pujari & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability‐Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 490-506, May.
    9. Shatha M. Obeidat & Anas A. Al Bakri & Said Elbanna, 2020. "Leveraging “Green” Human Resource Practices to Enable Environmental and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Qatari Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 371-388, June.
    10. Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2019. "A Framework to Explicate the Relationship Between CSER and Financial Performance: an Intellectual Capital-Based Approach and Knowledge-Based View of Firm," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1427-1446, December.
    11. Hsing‐Hua Stella Chang, 2024. "Sustainability competence in small and medium exporters: Determinant and outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5624-5646, September.
    12. Yuan Li & Thillai Raja Pertheban & Qiaoling Li & Zheng Guang-Wen, 2025. "The Green Innovation Gateway: How Technological Capabilities and Environmental Strategies Drive Sustainability Performance in Manufacturing Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
    13. Shaoling Wu & Peng Cheng & Jianghua Wang & Juntao Xiao, 2025. "The impact of entrepreneurial bricolage on sustainable entrepreneurship in China: the mediating role of digital transformation and the moderating role of green innovation," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Donghong Li & Yi‐Chuan Liao & Pengcheng Ma, 2022. "Contingent view on the relationship between proactive environmental strategy and corporate performance: Toward stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1605-1616, September.
    15. Lu Qiu & Xiaowen Jie & Yanan Wang & Minjuan Zhao, 2020. "Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 146-165, January.
    16. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    17. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    18. Zhunxin Huang & Zengrui Xiao, 2023. "Dynamic Capabilities, Environmental Management Capabilities, Stakeholder Pressure and Eco-Innovation of Chinese Manufacturing Firms: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Colin C. J. Cheng, 2020. "Sustainability Orientation, Green Supplier Involvement, and Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from Diversifying Green Entrants," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 393-414, January.
    20. Alpana Taneja & Vinay Goyal & Kunjana Malik, 2023. "Sustainability‐oriented innovations – Enhancing factors and consequences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2747-2765, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4312-4324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.