IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i6p5386-5404.html

Sustainable business model innovation, dynamic capabilities, and organizational design: Insights from Norwegian aquaculture

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Coffay
  • Ragnar Tveterås
  • Nancy Bocken
  • Marcel L.A.M Bogers

Abstract

Firms must increasingly grapple with complex sustainability challenges. Business model innovation is needed to achieve radical sustainability improvements. Recent research highlights the interrelatedness between business model innovation, dynamic capabilities, and organizational design, calling for empirical work to better illuminate these relationships. These connections are relevant in sustainability contexts, where organizational barriers and drivers have been shown to either facilitate or hinder the development of dynamic capabilities for sustainable business model innovation (SBMI). This paper presents a case study of an emergent low‐carbon offshore aquaculture value chain in Norway to illuminate the importance and roles of these organizational factors. Based on our analysis, we identify those barriers and drivers present in the Norwegian salmon aquaculture industry; add to the body of theory around organizational design, dynamic capabilities, and SBMI; and offer insights for practitioners in the aquaculture sector aiming to develop dynamic capabilities for SBMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Coffay & Ragnar Tveterås & Nancy Bocken & Marcel L.A.M Bogers, 2024. "Sustainable business model innovation, dynamic capabilities, and organizational design: Insights from Norwegian aquaculture," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5386-5404, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5386-5404
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3762
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    2. Vinicius Minatogawa & Matheus Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Maria Holgado & Diego Garrido & Hernan Pinto & Ruy Quadros, 2022. "Towards Systematic Sustainable Business Model Innovation: What Can We Learn from Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Marcel Bogers, 2011. "The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 93-117, January.
    4. Chesbrough, Henry & Tucci, Christopher L., 2020. "The Interplay Between Open Innovation and Lean Startup, or, Why Large Companies Are Not Large Versions of Startups," Strategic Management Review, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 277-303, June.
    5. Edurne A. Inigo & Laura Albareda & Paavo Ritala, 2017. "Business model innovation for sustainability: exploring evolutionary and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 515-542, July.
    6. McManners, Peter John, 2016. "Developing policy integrating sustainability: A case study into aviation," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 86-92.
    7. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    8. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    9. Bocken, Nancy & Konietzko, Jan, 2022. "Circular business model innovation in consumer-facing corporations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Bård Misund & Marit Schei Olsen & Tonje C. Osmundsen & Ragnar Tveterås, 2023. "The Political Economy of Salmon Aquaculture: Value Sharing and Societal Support for Aquaculture in Norway," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(4), pages 365-390.
    11. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2018. "Towards Understanding Collaboration Within Circular Business Models," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Lars Moratis & Frans Melissen & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Sustainable Business Models, chapter 0, pages 169-201, Springer.
    12. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2020. "How Do Companies Collaborate for Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Sidney G. Winter, 2003. "Understanding dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 991-995, October.
    15. Ron Adner & Constance E. Helfat, 2003. "Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1011-1025, October.
    16. Jay R. Galbraith, 1974. "Organization Design: An Information Processing View," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 28-36, May.
    17. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    18. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abbas, Jawad, 2026. "When and how corporate digital responsibility contributes to a firm's reputation in society: Scale development and structural analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Xiangyu Quan & Andra Riandita & Marte C. W. Solheim, 2026. "Does Geography Matter for Eco‐Innovation? A Comparison of Collaborative Eco‐Innovation Between Core and Peripheral Regions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5364-5377, May.
    3. Cláudia Fabiana Gohr & Bruna Cavalcanti Barros Rodrigues, 2025. "Dynamic Capabilities as Enablers for Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation: A Case Study in a Footwear Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3114-3140, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    2. Yuan, Chun & Xue, Doudou & He, Xin, 2021. "A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Vinicius Minatogawa & Matheus Franco & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Maria Holgado & Diego Garrido & Hernan Pinto & Ruy Quadros, 2022. "Towards Systematic Sustainable Business Model Innovation: What Can We Learn from Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, March.
    4. Min‐Jae Lee & Anna Pak & Taewoo Roh, 2024. "The interplay of institutional pressures, digitalization capability, environmental, social, and governance strategy, and triple bottom line performance: A moderated mediation model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5247-5268, September.
    5. Bejtush Ademi & Alf Steinar Sætre & Nora Johanne Klungseth, 2025. "What do established companies do to factor in sustainability into their business models?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 19-38, January.
    6. Daliborka Witschel & Aaron Döhla & Maximilian Kaiser & Kai-Ingo Voigt & Thilo Pfletschinger, 2019. "Riding on the wave of digitization: insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1023-1095, December.
    7. Cruz-Sánchez, Oscar & Cruz-Cázares, Claudio & Hernandez-Vivanco, Alfonso, 2026. "Business model innovation from dynamic capabilities perspective: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Florian Hofmann & Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, 2022. "Circular business model experimentation capabilities—A case study approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2469-2488, July.
    9. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    10. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Scheuer, Luca Joachim & Thaler, Julia, 2023. "How do dynamic capabilities affect performance? A systematic review of mediators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 914-931.
    12. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.
    13. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Maglietta, Amedeo & Oropallo, Eugenio, 2023. "Sailing through a digital and resilient shipbuilding supply chain: An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Sebrek, Szabolcs S. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Kosztyán, Zsolt T., 2025. "How to create dynamic capabilities: A design science study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Mikko Henrik Hirvonen, 2022. "The Pyramid Model: Conceptualizing an Organizational Capability to Design IT Investments," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Shaker A. Zahra & Olga Petricevic & Yadong Luo, 2022. "Toward an action-based view of dynamic capabilities for international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 583-600, June.
    17. Hameed, Kamran & Arshed, Noman & Yazdani, Naveed & Munir, Mubbasher, 2021. "Motivating business towards innovation: A panel data study using dynamic capability framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Richard Arend, 2013. "Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: a small business perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3447-3458.
    20. Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado, 2019. "Technology Transfer Capability: development dynamics in higher education institutions," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:6:p:5386-5404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.