IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v31y2022i5p2533-2545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinant factors and business strategy in a sustainable business model: An explorative analysis for the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Cui
  • Yunmeng Cao
  • Yijun Ji
  • I‐Shin Chang
  • Jing Wu

Abstract

Innovation strategies for the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies include not only new technologies for resource utilization of solid waste but also sustainable business models to support the adoption of these technologies. This study presents how to incorporate the determinant factors affecting technology promotion and business strategy into a sustainable business model for the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies. A systematic literature review summarizes the determinant factors affecting the aforementioned promotion, including market‐, policy‐, company‐, and technology‐related factors. Combined with the theoretical background of the sustainable business model, this study analyzes that for the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies from value dimensions (value proposition, value creation & delivery, and value capture) and sustainability dimensions (economic, social, and environmental). We confirm the importance of incorporating determinant factors into the sustainable business model from the analysis of the Daye Non‐Ferrous Metal Recycling Park. Our case study proposes that innovation of the sustainable business model needs to drive changes in business strategy. To promote the aforementioned technologies, we propose an Internet‐based technology service platform as the core strategy of the sustainable business model. As the private sector, technology companies can make full use of technological innovation, public policies, and the market environment to achieve and develop sustained competitive advantages through an Internet‐based platform and to effectively enhance the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies and help achieve sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Cui & Yunmeng Cao & Yijun Ji & I‐Shin Chang & Jing Wu, 2022. "Determinant factors and business strategy in a sustainable business model: An explorative analysis for the promotion of solid waste recycling technologies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2533-2545, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:2533-2545
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3042
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dongmin Kong & Xiandong Yang & Chen Liu & Wei Yang, 2020. "Business strategy and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 445-464, February.
    2. Kong, Xiaowei & Jiang, Fan & Zhu, Ling, 2022. "Business strategy, corporate social responsibility, and within-firm pay gap," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Chen Liu & Dongmin Kong, 2021. "Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 657-670, January.
    4. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    5. Amos Darko & Albert P. C. Chan, 2017. "Review of Barriers to Green Building Adoption," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 167-179, May.
    6. Janine Maniora, 2018. "Mismanagement of Sustainability: What Business Strategy Makes the Difference? Empirical Evidence from the USA," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 931-947, November.
    7. Gao, Xue & Rai, Varun, 2019. "Local demand-pull policy and energy innovation: Evidence from the solar photovoltaic market in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 364-376.
    8. Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain & Santoro, Gabriele & Khan, Jabran & Rizzato, Fabio, 2021. "Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation in the IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 389-400.
    9. Federico Cosenz & Vinicius Picanço Rodrigues & Francesco Rosati, 2020. "Dynamic business modeling for sustainability: Exploring a system dynamics perspective to develop sustainable business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 651-664, February.
    10. Specht, Jan Martin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2019. "Energy Supplier 2.0: A conceptual business model for energy suppliers aggregating flexible distributed assets and policy issues raised," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Schmookler, Jacob, 1962. "Economic Sources of Inventive Activity," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Cillo, Paola & Priem, Richard L. & Verona, Gianmario & Zanella, Paola, 2021. "Consumer-CEO interaction as catalyst for business model innovation in established firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 241-253.
    13. Huan Dou & Antai Li & Yonggen Luo, 2021. "Innovation in Business Groups: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2503-2513, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia, Yibo & Su, Jingqin & Cui, Li & Wu, Lin & Hua Tan, Kim, 2023. "Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni, 2022. "Stakeholders' engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies' performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders' practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1488-1503, May.
    2. Lv, Wendai & Ma, Wenhao & Yang, Xiandong, 2022. "Does social security policy matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Maryna Brychko & Yuriy Bilan & Serhiy Lyeonov & Dalia Streimikiene, 2023. "Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 587-599, April.
    4. Bablu Kumar Dhar & Iman Harymawan & Sabrina Maria Sarkar, 2022. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on financial expert CEOs' turnover in heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 701-711, May.
    5. Jinhuan Tian & Yan Dong & Gianluca Vagnani & Peizhong Liu, 2023. "Green innovation and the stock market value of heavily polluting firms: The role of environmental compliance costs and technological collaboration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4938-4953, November.
    6. Yan, Hong-Bin & Li, Ming, 2022. "Consumer demand based recombinant search for idea generation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Chen Liu & Dongmin Kong, 2021. "Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 657-670, January.
    8. Zhengguang Li & Ping Li & Xibo Zhao & Ziying Tu, 2022. "Business Strategy and Environmental Information Disclosure Quality: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Heavy Pollution Listed Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Jing Lu & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Dongning Yu & Jamal A. Nazari & Irene M. Herremans, 2021. "Board interlocks, absorptive capacity, and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3425-3443, December.
    10. Xinze Li & Luojia Wang & Kerui Du, 2023. "How do environmental regulations influence resource misallocation in China? The role of investment flows," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 538-550, January.
    11. Şimşek, Tolga & Öner, M Atilla & Kunday, Özlem & Olcay, Gökçen Arkalı, 2022. "A journey towards a digital platform business model: A case study in a global tech-company," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    13. Oliver Wagner & Thomas Adisorn & Lena Tholen & Dagmar Kiyar, 2020. "Surviving the Energy Transition: Development of a Proposal for Evaluating Sustainable Business Models for Incumbents in Germany’s Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Barge-Gil, Andrés & López, Alberto, 2014. "R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1634-1648.
    15. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Massa, Silvia & Testa, Stefania, 2011. "Beyond the conventional-specialty dichotomy in food retailing business models: An Italian case study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 476-482.
    17. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    18. Hong, Junjie & Shi, Fangyuan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2023. "Does network infrastructure construction reduce energy intensity? Based on the “Broadband China” strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Zahedi Rad, Vahid & Seifi, Abbas & Fadai, Dawud, 2023. "Policy design for transition from imitation to innovation in emerging photovoltaic sectors using a system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:2533-2545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.