IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v77y2006i2p167-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations du travail et syndicats de la fonction publique: un partenariat À construire

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Harrisson
  • Guy Bellemare

Abstract

Résumé**: Au cours des dix dernières années, les acteurs de l’administration publique du Québec ont expérimenté une configuration organisationnelle créative et originale constituée des Comités ministériels sur l’organisation du travail (CMOT). Peu d’études et de recherches se sont intéressées à cette forme de partenariat entre l’État, les syndicats et les associations professionnelles. Nous proposons une étude de cas de trois CMOT que nous considérons comme étant des innovations sociales dans l’administration publique. Les acteurs ont du mal à s’entendre sur les frontières délimitant la zone d’influence des CMOT au sein des ministères. Des nouvelles tensions naissent entre les gestionnaires et les représentants syndicaux. Néanmoins, une nouvelle zone de coopération se forme conduisant à un nouvel équilibre dans les relations entre les acteurs de l’administration publique. Nous proposons une analyse de la mise en place des CMOT, de sa lente évolution marquée de ruptures et de reprises. Malgré les obstacles, les acteurs s’entendent pour affirmer que le partenariat est nécessaire à la bonne marche du processus de transformation de l’administration publique.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Harrisson & Guy Bellemare, 2006. "Innovations du travail et syndicats de la fonction publique: un partenariat À construire," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 167-195, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:77:y:2006:i:2:p:167-195
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1370-4788.2006.00302.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1370-4788.2006.00302.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1370-4788.2006.00302.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freeman, C., 1991. "Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 499-514, October.
    2. JOSEPH B. ROSE & GARY N. CHAISON & ENRIQUE de la GARZA, 2000. "A Comparative Analysis of Public Sector Restructuring in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 21(4), pages 601-625, October.
    3. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    2. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Ruigrok, Winfried & Tate, John J, 1995. "Public Testing And Research Centers In Japan," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt3581k5pd, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    5. Havas, Attila & Weber, K. Matthias, 2017. "The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 327-337.
    6. Geyer, Anton & Davies, Andrew, 2000. "Managing project-system interfaces: case studies of railway projects in restructured UK and German markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 991-1013, August.
    7. Dolata, Ulrich, 2014. "Märkte und Macht der Internetkonzerne: Konzentration - Konkurrenz - Innovationsstrategien," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2014-04, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    8. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    9. Kudic, Muhamed & Pyka, Andreas & Günther, Jutta, 2012. "Determinants of Evolutionary Change Processes in Innovation Networks – Empirical Evidence from the German Laser Industry," IWH Discussion Papers 7/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    10. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Kaihuang Zhang & Qinglan Qian & Yijing Zhao, 2020. "Evolution of Guangzhou Biomedical Industry Innovation Network Structure and Its Proximity Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    13. Mueller, Matthias & Bogner, Kristina & Buchmann, Tobias & Kudic, Muhamed, 2015. "Simulating knowledge diffusion in four structurally distinct networks: An agent-based simulation model," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 05-2015, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    14. Jacob, Jojo & Belderbos, René & Lokshin, Boris, 2023. "Entangled modes: Boundaries to effective international knowledge sourcing through technology alliances and technology-based acquisitions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Hans Lööf, 2005. "A comparative perspective on innovation and productivity in manufacturing and services," Springer Books, in: Uwe Cantner & Elias Dinopoulos & Robert F. Lanzillotti (ed.), Entrepreneurships, the New Economy and Public Policy, pages 181-202, Springer.
    16. Maidana, Marcos Ignacio, 2016. "Los emprendedores tecnológicos: factores motivacionales," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2500, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    17. Laamanen, Tomi, 2005. "Dependency, resource depth, and supplier performance during industry downturn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-140, March.
    18. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    19. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    20. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:77:y:2006:i:2:p:167-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.