IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v74y2003i4p591-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childcare and Welfare Mix in France

Author

Listed:
  • Jean‐Louis Laville

Abstract

‘Proximity services’ have been the subject of frequent debate for more than a decade in French speaking countries. They can be defined as services which meet individual or collective needs and which are ‘local’ in either spatial or relational terms. Based on the situation in France, this paper aims to describe the many options available in the field of ‘proximity services’ and examine the support offered by the public authorities for the existing practices, considering that this support is representative of the evolutive relations between State, market and civil society. The limited success of the free market puts the question of a renewal of public intervention, which would accommodate all options available in this area, without being confined to a marketization of this field of activity. For this matter, the political embeddedness of associations and cooperatives is decisive for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean‐Louis Laville, 2003. "Childcare and Welfare Mix in France," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 591-630, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:74:y:2003:i:4:p:591-630
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2003.00237.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2003.00237.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2003.00237.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner BEN-NER & Theresa VAN HOOMISSEN, 1991. "Nonprofit Organizations In The Mixed Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 519-550, October.
    2. Jean Gadrey, 1990. "Rapports sociaux de service : une autre régulation," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(1), pages 49-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabienne Fecher & Benoît Lévesque, 2008. "The Public Sector And The Social Economy In The Annals (1975–2007): Towards A New Paradigm," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3‐4), pages 679-727, September.
    2. Alberta Andreotti & Enzo Mingione & Emanuele Polizzi, 2012. "Local Welfare Systems: A Challenge for Social Cohesion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1925-1940, July.
    3. Roger Spear & Eric Bidet, 2005. "Social enterprise for work integration in 12 european countries: a descriptive analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 195-231, June.
    4. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo Borzaga & Silvia Sacchetti, 2015. "Why Social Enterprises Are Asking to Be Multi-stakeholder and Deliberative: An Explanation around the Costs of Exclusion," Euricse Working Papers 1575, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    2. Junyi Shen & Nobuko Kanaya & Hiromasa Takahashi, 2014. "The Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-market: An Analysis of the Long-term Care Services Market in Japan," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-08, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    3. Sacchetti, Silvia & Tortia, Ermanno, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    4. Aggarwal, Rajesh K. & Evans, Mark E. & Nanda, Dhananjay, 2012. "Nonprofit boards: Size, performance and managerial incentives," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 466-487.
    5. Bernard Gazier & Marguerite Mendell, 2009. "Karl Polanyi Et La Pédagogie De L'Incohérence," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(1), pages 1-35, March.
    6. Benjamin HUYBRECHTS, 2007. "Fondements Et Implications De La Diversité Organisationnelle Au Sein Du Commerce Équitable," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 195-219, June.
    7. Leonardo Becchetti & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2008. "The Dynamics of Fair Trade as a Mixed-form Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 733-750, September.
    8. Nobuko KANAYA & Hiromasa TAKAHASHI & Junyi SHEN, 2015. "The Market Share of Nonprofit and For-profit Organizations in the Quasi-Market: Japan's Long-Term Care Services Market," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(2), pages 245-266, June.
    9. Schlicht, Ekkehart, . "Economic Analysis and Organised Religion," Chapters in Economics,, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    10. Marie Bouchard, 2012. "Social innovation, an analytical grid for understanding the social economy: the example of the Québec housing sector," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(1), pages 47-59, March.
    11. Carlo Borzaga & Riccardo Bodini, 2012. "What to make of social innovation? Towards a framework for policy development," Euricse Working Papers 1236, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    12. Carlo Borzaga & Sara Depedri & Ermanno Tortia, 2010. "The Growth of Organizational Variety in Market Economies: The Case of Social Enterprises," Euricse Working Papers 1003, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    13. Fabienne Fecher & Benoît Lévesque, 2008. "The Public Sector And The Social Economy In The Annals (1975–2007): Towards A New Paradigm," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3‐4), pages 679-727, September.
    14. Olivier Grégoire, 2004. "Pluralité de parties prenantes et d'objectifs dans les entreprises sociales d'insertion," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 73-79.
    15. Jacques Defourny & Marthe Nyssens, 2013. "Social Co-operatives: When Social Enterprises Meet the Co-operative Tradition," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 2(2), pages 11-33, May.
    16. Jindřich Špička & Markéta Arltová & Petr Boukal, 2019. "Selected Socioeconomic Determinants of the Size of the Nonprofit Sector Serving Households in the OECD Countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3), pages 276-295.
    17. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    18. Carías Vega, Dora E. & Keenan, Rodney J., 2016. "Situating community forestry enterprises within New Institutional Economic theory: What are the implications for their organization?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-13.
    19. Yoshiho Matsunaga & Naoto Yamauchi, 2004. "Is the Government Failure Theory Still Relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 227-263, June.
    20. Christian Jetté, 2005. "Caractérisation Des Rapports Entre L’état et Le Tiers Secteur Associatif Au Sein Du Système Sociosanitaire Québécois: L’émergence De Nouveaux Modes De Coordination," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(4), pages 645-675, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:74:y:2003:i:4:p:591-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.