Author
Listed:
- Yi‐Feng Zhang
- Shi‐Ou Liao
Abstract
This paper investigates the influence of the digital economy on farmers' involvement in rural environmental governance, using microdata from over 2800 farming households in the China Rural Revitalization Survey. The study focuses on three dimensions of the digital economy: digital infrastructure, digital business and digital life. The results show that the digital economy plays a significant role in promoting farmers' environmental governance behaviours. Among the three dimensions, digital infrastructure and digital life have a stronger impact, while digital business shows a more limited effect. Mechanism analysis identifies three primary pathways through which the digital economy influences governance behaviours: expanding social networks, increasing income and enhancing environmental awareness. However, digital business does not significantly contribute to environmental awareness, pointing to its limited effectiveness in driving behavioural change. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that farmers with larger‐scale operations, higher digital literacy and those in western regions are more positively impacted, whereas farmers in central regions show little effect. These findings highlight the need for region‐specific strategies that account for local conditions and demographic characteristics. The paper offers three policy recommendations: (1) tailor digital strategies to regional needs to enhance farmers' participation in environmental governance, (2) provide targeted training and support for low‐literacy and large‐scale farmers and (3) improve the alignment of digital business initiatives with environmental governance goals to foster greater synergy between technology and rural ecological management.
Suggested Citation
Yi‐Feng Zhang & Shi‐Ou Liao, 2025.
"The Impact of Digital Economy on Farmers' Environmental Governance Participation: A Mechanism Analysis Based on Chinese Rural Survey Data,"
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(4), pages 855-873, October.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:4:p:855-873
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70056
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:4:p:855-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.