IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v6y2015i2p63-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Differences among Selected EU Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Vukic Nikolina Markota

    () (RRiF d.o.o, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Background: Greater transparency has become a relevant topic for companies around the world. Information and communication technologies revolution (ICT revolution) has forced companies to become more transparent. With the intention of increasing companies’ transparency, the European Union (hereinafter: the EU) has presented a new Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU which makes Corporate Social Reporting (hereinafter: CSR reporting) mandatory for certain companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Vukic Nikolina Markota, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Differences among Selected EU Countries," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 63-73, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:63-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bsrj.2015.6.issue-2/bsrj-2015-0012/bsrj-2015-0012.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolk, Ans, 2010. "Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 367-374, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Social Responsibility reporting; Global Reporting Initiative; CSR reporting framework; European Union; O1; Q01;

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:63-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com/services/journals .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.