IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijlp/v9y2024i2p15-27id2704.html

Influence of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation in the Technology Sector in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Han Ji-min

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze influence of intellectual property laws on innovation in the technology Sector in South Korea Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Intellectual Property Laws have played a crucial role in fostering innovation within South Korea's technology sector. The strategic implementation of patent rights and utility models has been instrumental in the country's rapid technological advancement since the mid-1980s. This legal framework has not only protected but also incentivized the creation of new technologies, propelling South Korea to become a global leader in innovation. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Schumpeterian innovation theory, resource-based view (RBV) of the firm & institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on intellectual property laws on innovation in the technology Sector. Technology firms should adopt proactive strategies to navigate the intellectual property landscape effectively and leverage legal frameworks to foster innovation. Policymakers should prioritize the development of robust intellectual property regimes that balance incentives for innovation with the promotion of competition and access to knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Ji-min, 2024. "Influence of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation in the Technology Sector in South Korea," International Journal of Law and Policy, IPRJB, vol. 9(2), pages 15-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:15-27:id:2704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJLP/article/view/2704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Boldrin & David K. Levine, 2013. "The Case against Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
    2. Walter G. Park & Juan Carlos Ginarte, 1997. "Intellectual Property Rights And Economic Growth," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 51-61, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel Blit & Mauricio Zelaya, 2015. "Do Firms Respond to Stronger Patent Protection by Doing More R&D?," Working Papers 1501, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2015.
    2. Brown, James R. & Martinsson, Gustav & Petersen, Bruce C., 2017. "What promotes R&D? Comparative evidence from around the world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 447-462.
    3. Joel Blit & Mauricio Zelaya, "undated". "The impact of patent protection on R&D. Evidence using export markets," Working Papers 17010, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics.
    4. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Raza, Werner G., 2021. "COVID-19 and the failure of pharmaceutical innovation for the global South: The example of "neglected diseases" and emerging infectious diseases," Briefing Papers 32a, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    6. repec:osf:socarx:qzmf8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jonathan Trerise, 2016. "The influence of patents on science," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 15(4), pages 424-450, November.
    8. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    9. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Andrés, Antonio R. & Goel, Rajeev K., 2012. "Does software piracy affect economic growth? Evidence across countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 284-295.
    11. Mori, Tomoya & Sakaguchi, Shosei, 2018. "Collaborative knowledge creation: Evidence from Japanese patent data," MPRA Paper 88716, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Breandán Ó hUallacháin, 2025. "Organisations and the dynamics of change in the location of American invention," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(6), pages 1099-1122, May.
    13. Nejla YACOUB, 2012. "Brevetabilité des médicament, innovation et l’avenir de l’industrie pharmaceutique en Tunisie DRUGS PATENTABILITY INNOVATION AND THE FUTURE OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN TUNISIA THEORETICAL STUDY AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION," Working Papers 248, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    14. Sunil Kanwar, 2006. "Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights," Working papers 142, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    15. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Denis Ivanov, 2024. "Mega‐events and human rights violations: Empirical evidence from the long‐term perspective," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 71(2), pages 175-196, May.
    16. R. Inglesi-Lotz & A. Hakimi & A. Pouris, 2018. "Patents vs publications and R&D: three sides of the same coin? Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) for OECD and BRICS countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(45), pages 4912-4923, September.
    17. Neves, Pedro Cunha & Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Diana & Sochirca, Elena, 2021. "The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 196-209.
    18. G. Alenka Guzmán Chávez. & Hortensia Gómez Víquez. & Francisco López Herrera., 2018. "Patentes y crecimiento económico, el caso de México durante el TLCAN," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 0(2), pages 177-204, Agosto.
    19. Derya Fındık & Aysıt Tansel, 2013. "Intangible investment and Technical efficiency: The case of software-intensive manufacturing firms in Turkey," EY International Congress on Economics I (EYC2013), October 24-25, 2013, Ankara, Turkey 235, Ekonomik Yaklasim Association.
    20. Jason Potts & Andrew Torrance & Dietmar Harhoff & Eric von Hippel, 2024. "Profiting from Data Commons: Theory, Evidence, and Strategy Implications," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, March.
    21. Mónica L. Azevedo & Óscar Afonso & Sandra T. Silva, 2017. "Endogenous Growth and Intellectual Property Rights: A North–South Modelling Proposal with Population Ageing," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 72-94, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:15-27:id:2704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJLP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.