IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ety/journl/vespecialvol.4y2018i2p177-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patentes y crecimiento económico, el caso de México durante el TLCAN

Author

Listed:
  • G. Alenka Guzmán Chávez.

    (Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa.)

  • Hortensia Gómez Víquez.

    (Instituto Politécnico Nacional.)

  • Francisco López Herrera.

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.)

Abstract

Tras caracterizar la naturaleza de las patentes concedidas en México por el Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Intelectual (IMPI), el objetivo de este artículo es examinar la relación entre el número de patentes de residentes y el crecimiento económico durante 1991-2015. En una tendencia creciente de dependencia tecnológica en México, los hallazgos con base en un modelo de cointegración de patentes y crecimiento económico de largo plazo y un modelo vectorial de corrección del error, sugieren que el cambio marginal en las patentes afecta la tasa de crecimiento del PIB, pero éste no tiene un efecto significativo en el cambio en el número de las patentes -?pati-. Además, se aprecia la probable presencia de un cambio estructural. Finalmente, se detecta que los shocks en el número de patentes y en el crecimiento del PIB tienen sólo efectos transitorios en el ?pati, pero el shock en éste tiene efectos en el ?pib probablemente sustancialmente negativos y permanentes.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Alenka Guzmán Chávez. & Hortensia Gómez Víquez. & Francisco López Herrera., 2018. "Patentes y crecimiento económico, el caso de México durante el TLCAN," Economía: teoría y práctica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México, vol. 0(2), pages 177-204, Agosto.
    • Handle: RePEc:ety:journl:v:especialvol.4:y:2018:i:2:p:177-204
    DOI: 10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/E042018/Guzman
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/E042018/Guzman
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/E042018/Guzman?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gould, David M. & Gruben, William C., 1996. "The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 323-350, March.
    2. Rifat A. Atun & Ian Harvey & Joff Wild, 2007. "Innovation, Patents And Economic Growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Rifat A Atun & Desmond Sheridan (ed.), Innovation In The Biopharmaceutical Industry, chapter 4, pages 65-83, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Barro, Robert J, 1990. "Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 103-126, October.
    4. Martin,Will & Winters,L. Alan (ed.), 1996. "The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586016, September.
    5. ., 2017. "Towards an evolutionary complexity of endogenous innovation," Chapters, in: Endogenous Innovation, chapter 3, pages 51-65, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Rana P. Maradana & Rudra P. Pradhan & Saurav Dash & Kunal Gaurav & Manju Jayakumar & Debaleena Chatterjee, 2017. "Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Cristiano Antonelli, 2017. "Endogenous innovation: the creative response," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 689-718, November.
    8. K. J. Arrow, 1971. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 11, pages 131-149, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Kenneth C. Shadlen & Samira Guennif & Alenka Guzmán & Narayanan Lalitha (ed.), 2011. "Intellectual Property, Pharmaceuticals and Public Health," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13876.
    10. Cristiano Antonelli, 2017. "Endogenous Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15330.
    11. Rifat A. Atun & Ian Harvey & Joff Wild, 2007. "Innovation, Patents And Economic Growth," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 279-297.
    12. Albert G.Z. Hu & I.P.L. Png, 2013. "Patent rights and economic growth: evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 675-698, July.
    13. Malerba, Franco, et al, 1999. "'History-Friendly' Models of Industry Evolution: The Computer Industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 8(1), pages 3-40, March.
    14. Samira Guennif & Shadlen Ken & Guzman Alenka & N. Lalitha, 2011. "Intellectual property, pharmaceuticals and public health: access to drugs in developing countries," Post-Print hal-01345877, HAL.
    15. Walter G. Park & Juan Carlos Ginarte, 1997. "Intellectual Property Rights And Economic Growth," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 51-61, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Doytch, Nadia, 2022. "The impact of ICT patents on economic growth: An international evidence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    2. Kais Mtar & Walid Belazreg, 2023. "On the nexus of innovation, trade openness, financial development and economic growth in European countries: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 766-791, January.
    3. Kais Mtar & Walid Belazreg, 2021. "Causal Nexus Between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: the Case of OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 310-341, March.
    4. Neves, Pedro Cunha & Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Diana & Sochirca, Elena, 2021. "The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 196-209.
    5. Ceyhun Haydaroglu, 2015. "The Relationship between Property Rights and Economic Growth: an Analysis of OECD and EU Countries," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 4, pages 217-239, December.
    6. van der Waal, Mark B. & Feddema, Jelle J. & van de Burgwal, Linda H.M., 2023. "Mapping the broad societal impact of patents," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Qiu, Buhui & Wang, Teng, 2018. "Does Knowledge Protection Benefit Shareholders? Evidence from Stock Market Reaction and Firm Investment in Knowledge Assets," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 1341-1370, June.
    8. Sumner J. La Croix & Denise Eby Konan, 2002. "Intellectual Property Rights in China: The Changing Political Economy of Chinese–American Interests," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 759-788, June.
    9. Odilova, Shoirahon, 2016. "Patent protection, intelligence and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation," MPRA Paper 70842, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2017. "Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Pamela J. Smith & Sebastian J. Anti, 2022. "How does TRIPs compliance affect the economic growth of developing countries? Application of the Synthetic Control method," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(12), pages 3873-3906, December.
    12. Odilova, Shoirahon & Xiaomin, Gu, 2016. "IPR protection, intelligence and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation," MPRA Paper 71226, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Emrah Sofuoğlu & Oktay Kızılkaya & Emrah Koçak, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of High-Technology Exports on the Growth of the Turkish Economy," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 205-229, January.
    14. Carsten Fink & Keith E. Maskus, 2005. "Intellectual Property and Development : Lessons from Recent Economic Research," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7443.
    15. Mauro Soto Rubio & Vicente Germán-Soto & Luis Gutiérrez Flores, 2023. "Patentes, tamaño de empresa y financiamiento público en México: análisis regional con modelos de datos de conteo," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, Enero - M.
    16. Antonio Andrés, 2006. "The relationship between copyright software protection and piracy: Evidence from europe," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 29-51, January.
    17. Rao, B. Bhaskara, 2010. "Estimates of the steady state growth rates for selected Asian countries with an extended Solow model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-53, January.
    18. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Carine Nourry, 2012. "Dasgupta, D.: Modern growth theory," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 97-100, January.
    20. Wilson, E.J. & Chaudhri, D.P., 2000. "Endogeneity, Knowledge and Dynamics of Long Run Capitalist Economic Growth," Economics Working Papers wp00-03, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovación; patentes y crecimiento económico; causalidad Granger cointegración; México; TLCAN.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ety:journl:v:especialvol.4:y:2018:i:2:p:177-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Georgina Alenka Guzmán Chávez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etyuamx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.