IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/oijepm/v10y2025i1p55-88id3301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Environment and Performance of Projects in State-Owned Manufacturing Firms in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Pius Churu Githu
  • Dr. Stephen Titus Waithaka

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the regulatory environment on performance of projects in state-owned manufacturing firms in Kenya Methodology: The study adopted a pragmatic research philosophy and drew respondents from across twenty state owned manufacturing firms in Kenya. The study engaged respondents from these institutions by employing exploratory cross-sectional methodology and Stratified Random Sampling. Data collection involved semi-structured questionnaires which were done both physically and with the use of online forms. Descriptive analysis of data was conducted using measures of central tendencies and dispersion, development of a relational model between variables employed multiple regression analysis, while validation and reliability were performed using pilot testing, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient analysis and various methods of model diagnostics such as multicollinearity analysis, Analysis of Variance, Goodness of Fit and correlation analysis. Findings: The study established that projects in state owned manufacturing firms generally meet quality and stakeholder expectations but struggle with timelines and cost efficiency. Legal compliance requirements emerged as the strongest positive predictor of project performance while political dynamics had a significant negative impact. High prevalence of compliance requirements, particularly procurement procedures and institutional procedures contribute to accountability, but they can also lead to delays and bureaucracy. State control had relatively low influence on project performance, while Institutional structures and fiscal management framework had relatively moderate negative and positive influence on projects performance respectively. The resultant regression model explained approximately 30% of the variability in project performance Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Compliance requirements often ensure accountability and transparency, yet excessive bureaucracy constrains competitiveness. There is need to improve project performance in state-owned manufacturing enterprises by addressing regulatory inefficiencies, fostering institutional autonomy, mitigating political influences, simplifying regulatory procedures, automating processes, and promoting interorganizational collaboration. Additionally, aligning government programs with long-term institutional strategies and diversifying funding sources are crucial for enhancing financial resilience and ensuring project continuity in these institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pius Churu Githu & Dr. Stephen Titus Waithaka, 2025. "Regulatory Environment and Performance of Projects in State-Owned Manufacturing Firms in Kenya," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 55-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:oijepm:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:55-88:id:3301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJEPM/article/view/3301
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chege Purity Nyambura & Jesse Maina Kinyua & Kirema Nkanata Mburugu, 2020. "The Influence of Political Environment on the Performance of Business Process Outsourcing Sector in Kenya," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 6(8), pages 770-775, 08-2020.
    2. S. Lioukas & D. Bourantas & V. Papadakis, 1993. "Managerial Autonomy of State-Owned Enterprises: Determining Factors," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 645-666, November.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    3. Miguel Espinosa, 2021. "Labor Boundaries and Skills: The Case of Lobbyists," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1586-1607, March.
    4. Markus Groth, 2005. "Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results," ERSA conference papers ersa05p180, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Trautmann, Gerhard & Bals, Lydia & Hartmann, Evi, 2009. "Global sourcing in integrated network structures: The case of hybrid purchasing organizations," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 194-208, June.
    6. Pietro Cunha Dolci & Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2014. "Information technology investments and supply chain governance," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 18(2), pages 217-235.
    7. Junyon Im & Sunny Sun, 2015. "Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 95-117, March.
    8. Bo Cheng & Shiyu Lu, 2023. "Judicial system reform and trade credit financing: Evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3422-3436, September.
    9. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    10. Schwesinger, Georg & Müller, Stephan & Lundan, Sarianna M., 2016. "Governance Structures, Cultural Distance, and Socialization Dynamics: Further Challenges for the Modern Corporation," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145907, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Ariño, Africa & Reuer, Jeffrey J., 2004. "Alliance contractual design," IESE Research Papers D/572, IESE Business School.
    12. Daniel Scholten & Rolf Künneke, 2016. "Towards the Comprehensive Design of Energy Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Franklin Allen & Meijun Qian, 2025. "Alternative finance in the international business context: a review and future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(1), pages 43-61, February.
    15. Athias, Laure & Wicht, Pascal, 2025. "Make or buy for public services: Culture matters for efficiency considerations," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Omar Martin Fieles‐Ahmad & Matthias Huber, 2022. "Learn German, Buy German? Language‐learning opportunities abroad and exports," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(10), pages 3031-3058, October.
    17. Hoontaek Seo & Sangho Yi & William McCumber, 2024. "Friendly Boards and the Cost of Debt," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Andræs Barge-Gil, 2013. "Open Strategies and Innovation Performance," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 585-610, October.
    19. Robert S. Gibbons & Manuel Grieder & Holger Herz & Christian Zehnder, 2019. "Building an Equilibrium: Rules Versus Principles in Relational Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 7871, CESifo.
    20. Joao Dias & Vitor Mendes Magrico, 2009. "The impact of resource conditions and environmental uncertainty on inter-firm alliance strategies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 757-765.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:oijepm:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:55-88:id:3301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJEPM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.