IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-6p2353-2369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small Scale Farmers’ Legume Production in Nangoma Agriculture Camp Area: Challenges, Local Solutions and Opportunities for Scaling Up

Author

Listed:
  • Mutonga Kaleyi

    (The University of Zambia, Department of Development Studies)

  • Themba Mapulanga

    (The University of Zambia, Department of Development Studies)

  • Palicha Halwiindi

    (The University of Zambia, Department of Development Studies)

  • Request C. Mweetwa

    (The University of Zambia, Department of Development Studies)

Abstract

This study sought to explore the local solutions being used by small scale farmers to address legume production challenges in Nangoma Agriculture Camp Area and the existing opportunities for scaling up such local innovations. The study used a mixed method design which enabled the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data in order to have a comprehensive understanding of legume production challenges, local solutions and opportunities for scaling up such local innovations. The total sample size for the study was 254 in which 240 were legume small scale farmers selected using systematic random technique and 14 were key informants selected using purposive sampling. The findings of the study revealed that small scale farmers use local solutions such as village banking initiatives, loans from friends and personal savings to address the challenge of limited access to credit facilities. Additionally, the farmers use recycled seeds as a solution to the challenge of lack of access to improved and certified seeds. The study also found that farmers use oral history as well as learning from friends and successful farmers in their neighborhood on issues to do with legume production knowledge. This is done to address limited agricultural advisory services. For poor soils, the use of animal manure and intercropping as well as crop rotating cereals with legumes were found to be local solutions. While this was the case, the quantities of animal manure were found to be not sufficient to scale the practice. Additionally, problems of limited land among some farmers were resolved by way of land renting from farmers that have enough land and yet do not cultivate all of their land. Besides that, the use of boom paste, ashes and intercropping were found to be local solutions used to address legume production challenges related to pests and ants. The study also indicated that various opportunities existed for scaling up these local solutions in order to improve legume production. The use of village banks provided an opportunity for government to fund such groups to improve access to finance. Further, the use of animal manure to improve soil provides an opportunity for government to incorporate such manure into government support programs like FISP to promote large scale production from private sector. Besides that, learning from successful farmers, oral history and use of recycled seeds provides an opportunity for government and other stakeholders to employ more extension workers, promote out-grower schemes and village seed banks among others. Among other things, the study recommends that animal manure should be incorporated into the farmer input support program in order to scale up its usage and that government and other stakeholders should take keen interest in local solutions and scale them up to boost legume production among small scale farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mutonga Kaleyi & Themba Mapulanga & Palicha Halwiindi & Request C. Mweetwa, 2025. "Small Scale Farmers’ Legume Production in Nangoma Agriculture Camp Area: Challenges, Local Solutions and Opportunities for Scaling Up," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 2353-2369, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:2353-2369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-6/2353-2369.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/small-scale-farmers-legume-production-in-nangoma-agriculture-camp-area-challenges-local-solutions-and-opportunities-for-scaling-up/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Ellis, 2000. "The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 289-302, May.
    2. Bezaiet Dessalegn & Woinishet Asnake & Abiro Tigabie & Quang Bao Le, 2022. "Challenges to Adoption of Improved Legume Varieties: A Gendered Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Peter Zulu & Thomson Kalinda & Gelson Tembo, 2014. "Effects of the Maize Input Subsidy Program on Groundnuts Production in Zambia," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 253-253, June.
    4. Ellis, Frank, 2000. "Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296966.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    2. Ada P. Smith & Sechindra Vallury & Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, 2023. "Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(12), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Babigumira, Ronnie & Angelsen, Arild & Buis, Maarten & Bauch, Simone & Sunderland, Terry & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 67-79.
    4. Brett A Bryan & Jianjun Huai & Jeff Connor & Lei Gao & Darran King & John Kandulu & Gang Zhao, 2015. "What Actually Confers Adaptive Capacity? Insights from Agro-Climatic Vulnerability of Australian Wheat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    6. Debelo Bedada Yadeta & Fetene Bogale Hunegnaw, 2022. "Effect of International Remittance on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 383-402, June.
    7. Food Security and Agricultural Projects Analysis Service (ESAF), "undated". "Food insecurity and vulnerability in Viet Nam: Profiles of four vulnerable groups," ESA Working Papers 23798, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    8. Judith A. Cherni & Raúl Olalde Font & Lucía Serrano & Felipe Henao & Antonio Urbina, 2016. "Systematic Assessment of Carbon Emissions from Renewable Energy Access to Improve Rural Livelihoods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Schneider, Sergio & Tartaruga, Iván G. Peyré, 2004. "Território e abordagem territorial: das referências cognitivas aos aportes aplicados à análise dos processos sociais rurais [Territory and territorial approach: From cognitive references to approac," MPRA Paper 76485, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Munshi Sulaiman & Mehnaz Rabbani & Vivek A. Prakash, 2010. "Impact Assessment of CFPR/TUP: A Descriptive Analysis Based on 2002-2005 Panel Data," Working Papers id:2567, eSocialSciences.
    11. K.N. Nair, 2008. "Livelihood Risks and Coping Strategies: A Case Study in the Agrarian Village Of Cherumad, Kerala," Working Papers id:1376, eSocialSciences.
    12. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    13. Srilata Patnaik & C. Shambu Prasad, 2014. "Revisiting Sustainable Livelihoods: Insights from Implementation Studies in India," Vision, , vol. 18(4), pages 353-358, December.
    14. Sunderlin, William D. & Dewi, Sonya & Puntodewo, Atie & Müller, Daniel & Angelsen, Arild & Epprecht, Michael, 2008. "Why forests are important for global poverty alleviation: A spatial explanation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2).
    15. Dolores Koenig, 2024. "Evaluating well‐being after compulsory resettlement: Livelihoods, standards of living, and well‐being in Manantali, Mali," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 210-220, June.
    16. Md.Salamun Rashidin & Sara Javed & Bin Liu & Wang Jian, 2020. "Ramifications of Households’ Nonfarm Income on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence From a Rural Area of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    17. Lokina, Razack B., . "Forest Reform in Tanzania: A Review of Policy and Legislation," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 2(2).
    18. repec:zbw:iamodp:109518 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Hendrawan, Dienda C P & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers' Livelihood Resilience and Decision Making in Replanting," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322441, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Wei Liu & Christine A Vogt & Junyan Luo & Guangming He & Kenneth A Frank & Jianguo Liu, 2012. "Drivers and Socioeconomic Impacts of Tourism Participation in Protected Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, April.
    21. Jon D. Unruh, 2008. "Toward sustainable livelihoods after war: Reconstituting rural land tenure systems," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(2), pages 103-115, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-6:p:2353-2369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.