IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-5p5385-5405.html

Audit Committee Attributes and Financial Reporting Quality: A Pre and Post Cama 2020 Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tijani, Jamiu Olakunle

    (Lagos State University, Ojo)

  • Ajasa-Adeoye, Fadekemi Zainab

    (Lagos State University, Ojo)

  • Samuel Adeoye

    (Lagos State University, Ojo)

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of audit committee attributes on the financial reporting quality of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria, comparing pre- and post-Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020 periods using data from 2017–2023 from the Nigerian Exchange group. Specifically the study evaluated the impact of audit committee independence, audit committee size and audit committee financial expertise which served as proxies of audit committee attributes on earnings variability which served as a proxy for financial reporting quality. Ex-post facto research design was used and the population covered all listed manufacturing firms; out of which, 25 firms were selected via purposive sampling technique. Findings revealed that larger audit committees were associated with improved reporting quality before CAMA 2020, but reduced committee size under the new regulation correlated with higher earnings variability indicating a decline in reporting quality. Audit committee independence consistently improved reporting quality, even with fewer directors post-CAMA 2020 and financial expertise showed a positive relationship with earnings variability. The study concluded that while larger committees and independent directors enhance reporting quality, the role of financial experts requires reevaluation to address governance shortcomings. The study therefore recommended that the provisions of CAMA 2020 be revisited to reconsider the reduction in audit committee size.

Suggested Citation

  • Tijani, Jamiu Olakunle & Ajasa-Adeoye, Fadekemi Zainab & Samuel Adeoye, 2025. "Audit Committee Attributes and Financial Reporting Quality: A Pre and Post Cama 2020 Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 5385-5405, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:5385-5405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-5/5385-5405.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/audit-committee-attributes-and-financial-reporting-quality-a-pre-and-post-cama-2020-empirical-analysis/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rateb Mohammad Alqatamin, 2018. "Audit Committee Effectiveness and Company Performance: Evidence from Jordan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1-48, May.
    2. Steve Letza & Xiuping Sun & James Kirkbride, 2004. "Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: a critical review of corporate governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 242-262, July.
    3. Wided Bouaine & Yosr Hrichi, 2019. "Impact of Audit Committee Adoption and its Characteristics on Financial Performance: Evidence from 100 French Companies," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-92, February.
    4. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    5. Helena Lopes, 2016. "Agency theory and social interactions at work," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(4), pages 349-368, October.
    6. Amanuddin Bin Shamsuddin & Ghazi Mohammed Alshahri, 2022. "The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on Firm Performance: Evidence from Non-Financial Sectors in Oman," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 12(9), pages 816-836.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustapha Jamiu & Norfadzilah Rashid & Ishaq Ahmed Mohammed, 2024. "Do Audit Committee Attributes Impact Firm Performance: Evidence from the Nigerian Stock Exchange," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 105-118.
    2. Yoshikatsu Shinozawa, 2007. "The Effect of Organisational Form on Investment Products: an empirical analysis of the UK unit trust industry," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1244-1259, November.
    3. ATM Adnan & Nisar Ahmed, 2019. "The Transformation Of The Corporate Governance Model: A Literature Review," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(3), pages 7-47.
    4. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Waheed Akhtar & Mudassir Husnain & Rabnawaz Lodhi & Sonia Emaan, 2020. "A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case” ‐ An investigation through moderated‐mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2563-2577, November.
    5. Ayuso, Silvia & Argandoña, Antonio, 2007. "Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors?," IESE Research Papers D/701, IESE Business School.
    6. Siew Peng Lee, 2023. "Board monitoring effectiveness and corporate sustainability performance: do legal system and CEO non-duality matter?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1243-1267, May.
    7. Aila VIRTANEN & Tuomo TAKALA, 2016. "Accountability Of Corporate Boards In Finland," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 5-24, March.
    8. Nurfarahin M. Haridan & Ahmad F. S. Hassan & Yusuf Karbhari, 2018. "Governance, religious assurance and Islamic banks: Do Shariah boards effectively serve?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 1015-1043, December.
    9. Ayuso, Silvia & Rodriguez, Miguel A. & Garcia, Roberto & Ariño, Miguel A., 2007. "Maximizing stakeholders' interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance," IESE Research Papers D/670, IESE Business School.
    10. Alatassi Bchr & Letza Steve, 2018. "Best practice in bank corporate governance: The case of Islamic banks," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(4), pages 115-133, November.
    11. Riaz, Zahid & Ray, Pradeep & Ray, Sangeeta, 2022. "The impact of digitalisation on corporate governance in Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 410-424.
    12. Andrew West, 2006. "Theorising South Africa’s Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 433-448, November.
    13. Antonio Tencati & Laszlo Zsolnai, 2009. "The Collaborative Enterprise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 367-376, March.
    14. ATM Adnan & Hilda Tandigalla, 2017. "The Dramatic Shift In Emphasis From A Shareholder-Dominated Approach To A Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance Model," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 12(2), pages 11151:12-11, January.
    15. Amal Yamani, 2024. "The synergistic influence of board gender diversity and audit committee on the financial performance of Saudi Arabian banks," International Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance, Indian Accounting Association, Patna Branch, vol. 3(2), pages 61-77.
    16. Elena Merino & Montserrat Manzaneque & Yolanda Ramírez, 2019. "Value-added distribution to stakeholder of Spanish listed companies: a corporate governance perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 577-604, September.
    17. Minodora URSACESCU & Mihai CIOC, 2012. "A Study Regarding The Implementation Of Corporate Governance Principles In The Public Enterprises In Romania," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(2), pages 20-32, June.
    18. Ding, Yuan & Richard, Jacques & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 718-755.
    19. Cassidy, Kelly & Guilding, Chris, 2011. "Management models and differential agency challenges arising in Australian multi-titled tourism accommodation properties," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1271-1281.
    20. Michael Carney & Eric Gedajlovic & Sujit Sur, 2011. "Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 483-507, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:5385-5405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.