IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-5p4827-4835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Educational Privatization and School Choice on Testing and Access in the United States and Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Wajeeha Hazoor

    (Florida State University)

Abstract

Privatization in education is a global phenomenon that is rooted in the New Public Management (NPM) reforms of the 1970s (Koinzer, Nikolai & Waldow, 2017). NPM relies on the principle-agent dynamic which pertains to the inherent mismatch between the objectives of the principal and agent and puts results and efficiencies at the center of programming rather than issues of equity or fairness (Greuning, 2001). The impact of the most recent wave of globalization (starting in the 1990s) under which the aforementioned reforms took place in the educational sector globally is complex, due to the various drivers, processes and entities involved (Yergin & Stanislaw, 2002; Verger, Novelli, & Altinyelken, 2012). In general, neoliberalism, which is an underlying feature of this wave of globalization has led to the spread of educational privatization in both “developed†and “developing†countries (Yergin & Stanislaw, 2002; Coleman & Jones, 2004). In this context, in the United States (U.S.) for example, we may find the introduction of charter schools in the early 1990s. In Pakistan, we find a reduction in national educational expenditures, resulting in higher opportunity costs for schooling, the crowding out the state, and expansion in the private school sector coinciding with this time period (See Stromquist & Monkman, 2014; Robertson & Verger 2012).

Suggested Citation

  • Wajeeha Hazoor, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Educational Privatization and School Choice on Testing and Access in the United States and Pakistan," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 4827-4835, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:4827-4835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-5/4827-4835.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/a-comparative-analysis-of-educational-privatization-and-school-choice-on-testing-and-access-in-the-united-states-and-pakistan/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-5:p:4827-4835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.