IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-2p4602-4619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of Education: Factors Affecting Students’ Perception of the Usefulness of AI Tools in Education

Author

Listed:
  • Nathaniel De Leon

    (Department of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Rizal Technological University, Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong City, Philippines)

  • Joshua Palaya

    (Department of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Rizal Technological University, Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong City, Philippines)

  • Mylene Prado

    (Instructor, Rizal Technological University, Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong City, Philippines)

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in education has the potential to transform learning experiences. However, the extent to which students find these AI tools useful may depend on the level of their AI Literacy (AIL). This study investigates the association between AI literacy level and the perceived usefulness of AI in the academe. A survey was conducted among 172 students from five colleges at Rizal Technological University – Boni Campus during the second semester of the academic year 2023-2024. The researchers collected data on their demographic profile, AI literacy level (AILL), and perceived usefulness (PU) of AI tools in the academe, which is then analyzed using statistical methods to identify significant differences and associations. The results indicated a positive association between AI literacy levels and students’ perceptions of AI usefulness in the academe. Additionally, a significant difference in AILL, particularly in AI ethics, was observed when respondents were grouped by year level. These findings suggest that promoting AI literacy can enhance students’ engagement with AI tools in educational contexts. The study offers valuable insights for educators and policymakers in designing AI-related curricula and resources. However, the researchers acknowledge that the sample size may have affected the normality of the data. Future research is recommended to develop a more comprehensive AI literacy questionnaire to assess students’ readiness for AI use and to include a larger sample size, potentially incorporating other universities in the Philippines.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathaniel De Leon & Joshua Palaya & Mylene Prado, 2025. "The Future of Education: Factors Affecting Students’ Perception of the Usefulness of AI Tools in Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 4602-4619, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-2:p:4602-4619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-2/4602-4619.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-future-of-education-factors-affecting-students-perception-of-the-usefulness-of-ai-tools-in-education/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    2. Oleg V Pavlov & Evangelos Katsamakas, 2020. "Will colleges survive the storm of declining enrollments? A computational model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abendroth Dias Kulani & Arias Patricia & Bacco F. Manlio & Bassani Elias & Bertoletti Alice & Bertolini Lorenzo & Bertrand Astrid & Bili Danai & Boucher Philip & Cachia Romina & Ceresa Mario & Chaslot, 2025. "Generative AI Outlook Report," JRC Research Reports JRC142598, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    3. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    4. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    5. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Adam B. Jaffe & Joel Waldfogel, 2025. "Intellectual Property and Creative Machines," Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 47-79.
    6. Leonardo Banh & Gero Strobel, 2023. "Generative artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    8. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    9. Amali Matharaarachchi & Wishmitha Mendis & Kanishka Randunu & Daswin De Silva & Gihan Gamage & Harsha Moraliyage & Nishan Mills & Andrew Jennings, 2024. "Optimizing Generative AI Chatbots for Net-Zero Emissions Energy Internet-of-Things Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Marco Savorgnan & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Driving AI Adoption in the EU: A Quantitative Analysis of Macroeconomic Influences," Working Papers hal-05102974, HAL.
    11. Bohren, Noah & Hakimov, Rustamdjan & Lalive, Rafael, 2024. "Creative and Strategic Capabilities of Generative AI: Evidence from Large-Scale Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 17302, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Anthony Harding & Juan Moreno-Cruz, 2024. "Watts and Bots: The Energy Implications of AI Adoption," Papers 2409.06626, arXiv.org.
    13. Andreas D. Landmark & Johan E. Ravn & Hans Y. Torvatn & Lisbeth Øyum, 2024. "Digital Transformations Through the Lens of the Collaborative, Co-Generative and Domesticative," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 537-548, October.
    14. Martin Baily & David Byrne & Aidan Kane & Paul Soto, 2025. "Generative AI at the Crossroads: Light Bulb, Dynamo, or Microscope?," Papers 2505.14588, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    15. Leonardo Gambacorta & Han Qiu & Shuo Shan & Daniel M Rees, 2024. "Generative AI and labour productivity: a field experiment on coding," BIS Working Papers 1208, Bank for International Settlements.
    16. Becker, Dominik & Deck, Luca & Feulner, Simon & Gutheil, Niklas & Schüll, Moritz & Decker, Stefan & Eymann, Torsten & Gimpel, Henner & Pippow, Andreas & Röglinger, Maximilian & Urbach, Nils, 2024. "Lohnt sich Microsoft 365 Copilot? Eine Potenzialanalyse für Unternehmen und Bildungseinrichtungen," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 72, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    17. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Santangelo, Giulia, 2025. "Are Artificial Intelligence (AI) Skills a Reward or a Gamble? Deconstructing the AI Wage Premium in Europe," IZA Discussion Papers 17607, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Zemtsov, S., 2025. "Digital divide and regional development in Russia in the context of artificial intelligence diffusion," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 225-233.
    19. Cathy Yang & David Restrepo Amariles & Leo Allen & Aurore Troussel, 2025. "GPT Adoption and the Impact of Disclosure Policies," Papers 2504.01566, arXiv.org.
    20. Christian Peukert & Florian Abeillon & Jérémie Haese & Franziska Kaiser & Alexander Staub, 2024. "Strategic Behavior and AI Training Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 11099, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-2:p:4602-4619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.