IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-2p2233-2244.html

Evaluating Content Validity in Developing an Unregistered Childcare Monitoring Model to Mitigate Perceived Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Farah Ain Abd Shukor

    (Department of Business and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management and Economics, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Norlaile Salleh Hudin

    (Department of Business and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management and Economics, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

  • Nur Shahira Ahmad

    (Department of Business and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management and Economics, University Pendidikan Sultan Idris 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia)

Abstract

This article discusses the validity of instruments for the purpose of evaluating survey questions in a study. All items were developed based on adaptations from the literature. According to the study's findings, there are five key components that should be considered while creating an unregistered childcare monitoring model in order to lower perceived risk. These features include customer reviews, interactivity, laws, rules, regulations, technological innovation, and perceived risk. In order to help parents, make less risky childcare decisions, this study intends to assess the content validity of the questionnaire used to investigate an unregistered childcare monitoring model by looking at the effects of customer reviews, interactivity, law, rules and regulations, and technological innovation on perceived risk. Each item's content validity was developed with the help of six experts. In addition, a quantitative measurement method using the Content Validity Index (CVI) was used to assess whether the items should be retained or eliminated. The study's findings demonstrated strong content validity, with the overall value of the I-CVI content validity index ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. The S-CVI/UA and S-CVI/Ave values were 0.49 and 0.89, respectively. High content validity was shown by the Average technique, whilst moderate content validity was shown by the Universal Agreement method. Overall, these findings indicate that all items developed meet the criteria for proper measurement for a screening instrument, and all items in this survey are suitable for evaluating the development of an unregistered childcare monitoring model to reduce perceived risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Farah Ain Abd Shukor & Norlaile Salleh Hudin & Nur Shahira Ahmad, 2025. "Evaluating Content Validity in Developing an Unregistered Childcare Monitoring Model to Mitigate Perceived Risk," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 2233-2244, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-2:p:2233-2244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-2/2233-2244.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/evaluating-content-validity-in-developing-an-unregistered-childcare-monitoring-model-to-mitigate-perceived-risk/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vijay Kumar Shrotryia & Upasana Dhanda, 2019. "Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, February.
    2. R. Filieri & F. Acigkoz & V. Ndou & Y. Dwivedi, 2020. "Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers’ continuance intention," Post-Print hal-04779109, HAL.
    3. Pietropoli, Ilaria & Triventi, Moris, 2023. "What drives early childhood education attendance? The role of structural factors and personal beliefs in Germany," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Wang, Xinghua & Zhang, Mengmeng & Yu, Yiqing & Hu, Biying & Yang, Xiantong, 2021. "Extending the theory of planned behavior to examine Chinese parents’ intention to use child care services for children under age 3," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lanlan Gao & Rupert Ward & Carlo Fabricatore, 2023. "Guidelines of Serious Game Design for Promoting Reframing," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 68-84, February.
    2. Alaa Ibrahim Lary & Rosmini Omar, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Role of Employer Branding, Person-Organization Fit and Employee Engagement in Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 172-181, December.
    3. Yan, Min & Filieri, Raffaele & Gorton, Matthew, 2021. "Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Sumit Tripathi & Roma Trigunait & Dinesh Chandra Pandey, 2025. "A Behavioral and Environmental Framework for Sustainable Retail Forecasting and Decision-Making," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(7), pages 5935-5963, December.
    5. Mónica Rojas-Chaves & Manuel Lucas-Matheu & Gracia Castro-Luna & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Validation of a Scale on Society’s Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities—Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    6. Yung-Lun Liu & Pen-Fa Ko & Jui-Te Chiang, 2021. "Developing an Evaluation Model for Monitoring Country-Based Tourism Competitiveness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    7. Lígia Passos & João Tavares & Daniela Figueiredo, 2021. "Assessing Caregivers’ Skills in Assisting People with Dementia during Mealtime: Portuguese Cultural Adaptation of the Feeding Skills Checklist," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Seyed Mohsen Mirbagheri & Ata Ollah Rafiei Atani, 2025. "Managers’ Cognitive Biases in Decision Making: Revisiting an Effective Method," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    9. Anandhi Elangovan & Manivannan Babu, 2024. "Decoding Users’ Continuance Intentions towards Digital Financial Platforms in the Indian Economy," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 213-222, October.
    10. Nurul ’ Ain Jamion & Khai Ern Lee & Mazlin Mokhtar & Thian Lai Goh, 2026. "The nature values of constructed wetlands in climate change mitigation and adaptation in the context of carbon-water nexus: stakeholders’ perception of Paya Indah wetlands, Malaysia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 41-72, January.
    11. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:9491-9502 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Fang, Guanfu & Miao, Liya, 2024. "Expanding boundaries: The Impact of kindergarten availability on women's employment in China," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Peng Yingyi & Nitanan Koshy Matthew & Tareq Mzek, 2025. "Local Visitors’ Willingness to Pay for an Increase in the Entrance Fee at Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda (Ailuropoda Melanoleuca) Breeding, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    14. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & José M. Cansino, 2022. "A Water Footprint Management Construct in Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Content Validity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Hayfa Almutary & Nahla Tayyib, 2021. "Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management and Knowledge Instruments for People at Pre-Dialysis Stage in the Arab World," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(8), pages 1231-1240, November.
    16. Nur Ain Md Lukmanul Hakim & Mohamad Rasidi Pairan & Mohamad Ikram Zakaria, 2025. "Step-By-Step Guide to Calculating Content Validity Index (CVI) For Single Constructs Using Excel," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 1717-1726, March.
    17. Taiga Saito & Shivam Gupta, 2025. "Big data applications with theoretical models and social media in financial management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 1489-1511, May.
    18. Hazeqa Salleh & Richard Avoi & Haryati Abdul Karim & Suhaila Osman & Nirmal Kaur & Prabakaran Dhanaraj, 2023. "Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation to Malay, and psychometric evaluation of the AIM-IAM-FIM questionnaire: Measuring the implementation outcome of a community-based intervention programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Ie Zheng Goh & Nitanan Koshy Matthew, 2021. "Residents’ Willingness to Pay for a Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Juita Saleha Nordin & Nitanan Koshy Matthew & Chong Leong Puan, 2023. "Public Willingness to Pay for an Entrance Fee to National Elephant Conservation Center (NECC), Peninsular Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    21. Wenting Wang & Sixue Wu, 2024. "Analyzing User Psychology and Behavior in Short-Form Video Shopping Platforms: An Integrated TAM and ISS Model Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-2:p:2233-2244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.