IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation to Malay, and psychometric evaluation of the AIM-IAM-FIM questionnaire: Measuring the implementation outcome of a community-based intervention programme

Author

Listed:
  • Hazeqa Salleh
  • Richard Avoi
  • Haryati Abdul Karim
  • Suhaila Osman
  • Nirmal Kaur
  • Prabakaran Dhanaraj

Abstract

Background: The implementation outcomes determine the success and progress of a community-based intervention programme. The community is an important stakeholder whose effects should be assessed. Nevertheless, Malaysia has limited instruments for determining outcome measurements. This research aimed to develop Malay versions of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility Intervention Measures (AIM-IAM-FIM) questionnaire, which evaluates the implementation outcome of the programme. Methods: A methodological study of the translation and validation of the implementation outcome measures was conducted from March 2022 until December 2022. Three key analyses were conducted: (1) translation and validation; (2) factor investigation and extraction (n = 170); and (3) scale evaluation (n = 235). Result: The Malay version measuring the implementation outcome measures of a community-based intervention programme was produced after extensive translation and modification, and it consisted of a single dimension with seven items. The content validity index was 0.9, the exploratory factor analysis showed that the KMO measure of sample adequacy was 0.9277, and Bartlett’s sphericity test was statistically significant. Cronbach’s alpha was good, with a level of 0.938. The single factor structure fitted the data satisfactorily [χ2 (p-value of 0.002), SRMR = 0.030, CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.079, TLI = 0.998]. Factor loading for all items was > 0.7. Conclusion: The 7-item Malay version of the AIM-IAM-FIM survey instrument is valid and reliable for assessing the acceptability of a community-based intervention study and is applicable to other fields. Future studies in psychometric evaluation are recommended in other states due to the variety of Malay dialects spoken across Asia. The scale may also benefit other areas where the language is spoken.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazeqa Salleh & Richard Avoi & Haryati Abdul Karim & Suhaila Osman & Nirmal Kaur & Prabakaran Dhanaraj, 2023. "Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation to Malay, and psychometric evaluation of the AIM-IAM-FIM questionnaire: Measuring the implementation outcome of a community-based intervention programme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294238
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294238&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vijay Kumar Shrotryia & Upasana Dhanda, 2019. "Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, February.
    2. McLeroy, K.R. & Norton, B.L. & Kegler, M.C. & Burdine, J.N. & Sumaya, C.V., 2003. "Community-based interventions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(4), pages 529-533.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nur Izyan Mohd Amin & Nor Azlin Mohd Nordin & Aniza Ismail & Sharmila Gopala Krishna Pillai & Hanif Farhan Mohd Rasdi, 2024. "A single-blind, randomised control trial on the effectiveness of a structured multi component training module for family caregiver of persons with Parkinson’s disease: A study protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mónica Rojas-Chaves & Manuel Lucas-Matheu & Gracia Castro-Luna & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Validation of a Scale on Society’s Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities—Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Yung-Lun Liu & Pen-Fa Ko & Jui-Te Chiang, 2021. "Developing an Evaluation Model for Monitoring Country-Based Tourism Competitiveness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    3. Lígia Passos & João Tavares & Daniela Figueiredo, 2021. "Assessing Caregivers’ Skills in Assisting People with Dementia during Mealtime: Portuguese Cultural Adaptation of the Feeding Skills Checklist," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Minmin Jiang & Lu Li & Wei Xing Zhu & Therese Hesketh, 2020. "Community-Based Intervention to Improve the Well-Being of Children Left Behind by Migrant Parents in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Nur Ain Md Lukmanul Hakim & Mohamad Rasidi Pairan & Mohamad Ikram Zakaria, 2025. "Step-By-Step Guide to Calculating Content Validity Index (CVI) For Single Constructs Using Excel," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 1717-1726, March.
    6. Richard, Lucie & Lehoux, Pascale & Breton, Eric & Denis, Jean-Louis & Labrie, Louise & Leonard, Claudine, 2004. "Implementing the ecological approach in tobacco control programs: results of a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 409-421, November.
    7. Josine M. Stuber & Cédric N. H. Middel & Joreintje D. Mackenbach & Joline W. J. Beulens & Jeroen Lakerveld, 2020. "Successfully Recruiting Adults with a Low Socioeconomic Position into Community-Based Lifestyle Programs: A Qualitative Study on Expert Opinions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Tobias Ubert & Sarah Forberger & Dirk Gansefort & Hajo Zeeb & Tilman Brand, 2017. "Community Capacity Building for Physical Activity Promotion among Older Adults—A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Yasangi Anuradha Iddagoda & Henarath H. D. N. P. Opatha, 2020. "Relationships and Mediating Effects of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Study of Managerial Employees of Sri Lankan Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, April.
    10. Atinga, Roger A. & Agyepong, Irene Akua & Esena, Reuben K., 2019. "Willing but unable? Extending theory to investigate community capacity to participate in Ghana’s community-based health planning and service implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 170-178.
    11. Md Shahzalal & Hamedi Mohd Adnan, 2022. "Attitude, Self-Control, and Prosocial Norm to Predict Intention to Use Social Media Responsibly: From Scale to Model Fit towards a Modified Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    12. Alaa Ibrahim Lary & Rosmini Omar, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Role of Employer Branding, Person-Organization Fit and Employee Engagement in Shaping Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 172-181, December.
    13. Nur Farah Ain Abd Shukor & Norlaile Salleh Hudin & Nur Shahira Ahmad, 2025. "Evaluating Content Validity in Developing an Unregistered Childcare Monitoring Model to Mitigate Perceived Risk," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 2233-2244, February.
    14. Rutja Phuphaibul & Watana Teamprathom & Apa Puckpinyo & Supannee Tharakul, 2016. "Can a community‐based multidisciplinary intervention effectively restore renal function? A non‐randomized clinical trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 533-538, December.
    15. Tilman Brand & Claudia R. Pischke & Berit Steenbock & Johanna Schoenbach & Saskia Poettgen & Florence Samkange-Zeeb & Hajo Zeeb, 2014. "What Works in Community-Based Interventions Promoting Physical Activity and Healthy Eating? A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Corey A. Krabbenhoft & Susan Manente & Donna R. Kashian, 2019. "Evaluation of an Educational Campaign to Improve the Conscious Consumption of Recreationally Caught Fish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. van Dijken, M.W. & Stams, G.J.J.M. & de Winter, M., 2016. "Can community-based interventions prevent child maltreatment?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 149-158.
    18. McNeish, Roxann & Rigg, Khary K. & Tran, Quynh & Hodges, Sharon, 2019. "Community-based behavioral health interventions: Developing strong community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 111-115.
    19. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & José M. Cansino, 2022. "A Water Footprint Management Construct in Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Content Validity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Hayfa Almutary & Nahla Tayyib, 2021. "Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management and Knowledge Instruments for People at Pre-Dialysis Stage in the Arab World," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(8), pages 1231-1240, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.