IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i1p4564-4580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Scope Creep in Contracts Execution: A Strategic Framework for Risk Mitigation and Operational Success

Author

Listed:
  • David Chinalu Anaba

    (Independent Researcher, Port Harcourt Nigeria)

  • Mercy Odochi Agho

    (Independent Researcher, Portharcourt Nigeria)

  • Ekene Cynthia Onukwulu

    (Independent Researcher, Nigeria)

  • Peter Ifechukwude Egbumokei

    (Shell Nigeria Gas (SEN/ SNG), Nigeria)

Abstract

Scope creep remains a significant challenge in contract execution, often resulting in project delays, cost overruns, and strained client-contractor relationships. This review outlines a strategic framework combining digital tools and traditional management techniques to proactively manage and mitigate scope creep, ensuring risk mitigation and operational success. The framework emphasizes a dual approach. First, it integrates digital tools such as project management software, real-time tracking systems, and collaborative platforms to enhance transparency, facilitate communication, and monitor deviations from the project scope. These tools enable the early detection of potential scope changes, providing stakeholders with actionable insights to address issues promptly. Secondly, it incorporates traditional management techniques, including clear contract documentation, stakeholder alignment, and robust change management protocols, to establish a solid foundation for managing scope creep. Central to this framework is the emphasis on proactive planning, where initial project scoping involves meticulous identification of deliverables, milestones, and potential risks. Regular communication between stakeholders, supported by well-defined roles and responsibilities, ensures alignment throughout the project lifecycle. Additionally, the framework advocates for periodic reviews and audits to maintain adherence to the agreed-upon scope and contractual obligations. The strategic framework further addresses risk mitigation by embedding a contingency approach, preparing project teams for unforeseen changes while minimizing disruptions. By leveraging both digital tools and traditional methods, the framework creates a balanced approach that optimizes efficiency, adaptability, and accountability in contract execution. This review concludes that adopting such a strategic framework not only mitigates the risks associated with scope creep but also enhances operational success and fosters stronger client-contractor relationships. The proposed methodology underscores the importance of a holistic approach, leveraging technology and proven practices to navigate the complexities of modern contract execution.

Suggested Citation

  • David Chinalu Anaba & Mercy Odochi Agho & Ekene Cynthia Onukwulu & Peter Ifechukwude Egbumokei, 2025. "Managing Scope Creep in Contracts Execution: A Strategic Framework for Risk Mitigation and Operational Success," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 4564-4580, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:4564-4580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-1/4564-4580.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/managing-scope-creep-in-contracts-execution-a-strategic-framework-for-risk-mitigation-and-operational-success/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek Walker & Beverley Lloyd-Walker, 2016. "Understanding Collaboration in Integrated Forms of Project Delivery by Taking a Risk-Uncertainty Based Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Alexander Lavin & Ciarán M. Gilligan-Lee & Alessya Visnjic & Siddha Ganju & Dava Newman & Sujoy Ganguly & Danny Lange & Atílím Güneş Baydin & Amit Sharma & Adam Gibson & Stephan Zheng & Eric P. Xing &, 2022. "Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Johan Larsson & Lisa Larsson, 2020. "Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Asaad Alzayed, 2024. "Evaluating the Role of Requirements Engineering Practices in the Sustainability of Electronic Government Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Isabella M. Nolte & Jörg Lindenmeier, 2024. "Creeping crises and public administration: a time for adaptive governance strategies and cross-sectoral collaboration?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(11), pages 3104-3125, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoeb Ahmed Memon & Steve Rowlinson & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Hafiz Zahoor, 2021. "Collaborative Behavior in Relational Contracting Projects in Hong Kong—A Contractor’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Kamran Khan & Thomas Henschel, 2024. "LCT-Based Framework for the Assessment of Sustainability: From the Perspective of Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Ole Jonny Klakegg, 2016. "Project Risk Management: Challenge Established Practice," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-3, December.
    4. Hee-sung Bae, 2021. "The Interaction Effect of Information Systems of Shipping and Logistics Firms and Managers’ Support for Blockchain Technology on Cooperation with Shippers for Sustainable Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Peter Konhäusner & Marius Thielmann & Veronica Câmpian & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2021. "Crowdfunding for Independent Print Media: E-Commerce, Marketing, and Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Ole Jonny Klakegg & Julien Pollack & Lynn Crawford, 2020. "Preparing for Successful Collaborative Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Tay Chze Chow & Suhaiza Zailani & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Zhang Qiannan & Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan & Ataul Karim Patwary, 2021. "Impact of sustainable project management on project plan and project success of the manufacturing firm: Structural model assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Gisele Blak Bernat & Eduardo Linhares Qualharini & Marcela Souto Castro & André Baptista Barcaui & Raquel Reis Soares, 2023. "Sustainability in Project Management and Project Success with Virtual Teams: A Quantitative Analysis Considering Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-38, June.
    9. Bajomo, Mary & Ogbeyemi, Akinola & Zhang, Wenjun, 2022. "A systems dynamics approach to the management of material procurement for Engineering, Procurement and Construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    10. Mohammad Bilal Shaukat & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2022. "Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 58-75, February.
    11. Ehsan Namdar Joyami & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi & Seyed AliGholi Rowshan, 2024. "Quality Management and Environmental Management: Role of Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-Based Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8457-8494, June.
    12. Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Jiafu Su, 2023. "Unveiling the Influence: Exploring the Impact of Interrelationships among E-Commerce Supply Chain Members on Supply Chain Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Mark Geoghegan & Kathryn Cormican & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Sustainable Team Design: A Challenge to Traditional Beliefs in Information-Intensive Service Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Daria Ivina & Nils O. E. Olsson & Carl-William Palmqvist & Lena Winslott Hiselius, 2023. "Uncertainties in scheduling and execution of trackwork in Sweden," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 767-789, October.
    15. Naimatullah Shah & Bahadur Ali Soomro, 2021. "Internal green integration and environmental performance: The predictive power of proactive environmental strategy, greening the supplier, and environmental collaboration with the supplier," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1333-1344, February.
    16. Qingzhen Zhang & Wenzhe Tang & Jersey Liu & Colin F. Duffiel & Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lihai Zhang & Xuteng Zhang, 2018. "Improving Design Performance by Alliance between Contractors and Designers in International Hydropower EPC Projects from the Perspective of Chinese Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Danijela Toljaga-Nikolić & Marija Todorović & Marina Dobrota & Tijana Obradović & Vladimir Obradović, 2020. "Project Management and Sustainability: Playing Trick or Treat with the Planet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Rashid Maqbool & Mohammed Rayan Saiba & Ayman Altuwaim & Yahya Rashid & Saleha Ashfaq, 2023. "The influence of industrial attitudes and behaviours in adopting sustainable construction practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 893-907, April.
    19. Ermal Hetemi & Joaquin Ordieres-Meré & Cali Nuur, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Digitalization in Sustainability-Oriented Infrastructure Projects: The Limits of the Building Information Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:4564-4580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.