IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i1p433-d1312763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Role of Requirements Engineering Practices in the Sustainability of Electronic Government Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Asaad Alzayed

    (Computer Science and Information Systems Department, College of Business Studies, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET), Al-Ardiya, Kuwait City 13092, Kuwait)

Abstract

The efficacy of electronic government (E-Government) initiatives relies significantly on requirements engineering (RE). Every government wants sustainable solutions in the implementation of E-Government projects. The current research has adopted a mix of research methods. After conducting a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR), the author conducted a case study to evaluate the proposed model. This research conducts an SLR of the contemporary literature on the success and failure factors of E-Government projects. Additionally, there is an association between the failure factors and the utilization of RE practices. A comprehensive search of electronic databases yielded a total of 71 pertinent articles. After meticulous screening and quality assessment, the data were extracted for analysis. A total of 62 papers were eventually selected. The SLR addressed the distinct hurdles encountered by government bodies. The findings indicated a positive relationship between the utilization of RE practices and the attainment of project success. Various aspects, such as project management practices, stakeholder engagement, and effective communication, were identified as factors that can reduce failures in E-Government projects. The deficiencies observed in E-Government initiatives were linked to inadequacies in implementing RE practices. The other issues identified were insufficient requirement elicitation, limited stakeholder involvement, and inadequate validation and verification of requirements. This study also presented a conceptual framework illustrating the difficulties in E-Government and the practices of RE. Statistical data analysis techniques were employed to examine this conceptual framework. This study suggests that managers examine and evaluate their E-Government project failure reasons and factors on a periodic basis to sustain and continuously enhance E-Government project success.

Suggested Citation

  • Asaad Alzayed, 2024. "Evaluating the Role of Requirements Engineering Practices in the Sustainability of Electronic Government Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:433-:d:1312763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam, Isabelle & Fazekas, Mihály, 2021. "Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Malodia, Suresh & Dhir, Amandeep & Mishra, Mahima & Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed, 2021. "Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Chee-Wee Tan & Shan L. Pan & Eric T.K. Lim, 2005. "Managing Stakeholder Interests in e-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore e-Government Project," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 31-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10026:y:2021:i:1:p:576-596 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Maura Campra & Paolo Esposito & Valerio Brescia, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and technological perspectives in healthcare: An exploratory analysis of the evolution of the anti‐corruption system through multiple case studies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2816-2829, November.
    3. Bansal, Anjali & Panchal, Tanvi & Jabeen, Fauzia & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Singh, Gurmeet, 2023. "A study of human resource digital transformation (HRDT): A phenomenon of innovation capability led by digital and individual factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Georgios Kontogeorgis & Nikolaos Varotsis, 2021. "Reinstating Greek E-Governance: A Framework For E-Government Benchmarking, Improvement And Government Policies," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 103-127.
    5. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Iosif Plimakis, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Sector Management Reforms during the pandemic. The effects of Covid-19 on public management reforms and effectiveness," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 576-596, Decembrie.
    6. Suri, Pradeep Kumar & Sushil,, 2022. "Effectiveness of strategy implementation and e-governance performance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Saari, Anniina & Vimpari, Jussi & Junnila, Seppo, 2022. "Blockchain in real estate: Recent developments and empirical applications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Stratu-Strelet, Doina & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raúl & Guerola-Navarro, Vicente, 2023. "Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing Latin America countries: Building a democracy consolidation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Ana-Maria Apostol & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2021. "Comparative study on the analysis of digital governance in Romania and Bulgaria," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 38-53, October.
    11. Nicu Gavriluță & Virgil Stoica & Gheorghe-Ilie Fârte, 2022. "The Official Website as an Essential E-Governance Tool: A Comparative Analysis of the Romanian Cities’ Websites in 2019 and 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    12. repec:thr:techub:10024:y:2021:i:1:p:38-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ciesielska, Magdalena & Rizun, Nina & Chabik, Jakub, 2022. "Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    14. Whitley, Edgar A. & Martinez, Tatiana, 2023. "Open data as an anticorruption tool? Using distributed cognition to understand breakdowns in the creation of transparency data," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118578, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Malodia, Suresh & Mishra, Mahima & Fait, Monica & Papa, Armando & Dezi, Luca, 2023. "To digit or to head? Designing digital transformation journey of SMEs among digital self-efficacy and professional leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Jaiswal, Deepak & Mohan, Ashutosh & Deshmukh, Arun Kumar, 2023. "Cash rich to cashless market: Segmentation and profiling of Fintech-led-Mobile payment users," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Iyanna, Shilpa & Kaur, Puneet & Ractham, Peter & Talwar, Shalini & Najmul Islam, A.K.M., 2022. "Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 150-161.
    18. Gholipour, Hassan F. & Arjomandi, Amir & Andargoli, Amirhossein Eslami & Bennett, Rohan, 2023. "On real estate market transparency: The relationship with ICT trade and investment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:433-:d:1312763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.